Common Areas for Improvement in Physical Science Units That Have Critically Low Student Satisfaction

A. Carbone, J. Ceddia
{"title":"Common Areas for Improvement in Physical Science Units That Have Critically Low Student Satisfaction","authors":"A. Carbone, J. Ceddia","doi":"10.1109/LaTiCE.2013.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Course and teaching evaluation questionnaires (CTEQs) have become standard practice in Australian universities to evaluate teaching and student experiences. National results have shown that ratings of disciplines in the physical sciences (Information Technology, Engineering and Science) generally perform poorly on the CTEQs compared to other disciplines. In this paper, a thematic analysis of the students' feedback was undertaken for units in physical science cluster that students experienced as needing critical attention. These units were delivered in semester 2, 2010 at Monash University. The analysis has revealed that the top three concerns for students across the physical science disciplines are lecturer presentation, lecture content and unit organization. These findings are consistent with those from over 35 years ago despite changes in student demographics, advances in learning theory and technological advances used in the delivery of course content.","PeriodicalId":143939,"journal":{"name":"2013 Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering","volume":"19 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2013.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Course and teaching evaluation questionnaires (CTEQs) have become standard practice in Australian universities to evaluate teaching and student experiences. National results have shown that ratings of disciplines in the physical sciences (Information Technology, Engineering and Science) generally perform poorly on the CTEQs compared to other disciplines. In this paper, a thematic analysis of the students' feedback was undertaken for units in physical science cluster that students experienced as needing critical attention. These units were delivered in semester 2, 2010 at Monash University. The analysis has revealed that the top three concerns for students across the physical science disciplines are lecturer presentation, lecture content and unit organization. These findings are consistent with those from over 35 years ago despite changes in student demographics, advances in learning theory and technological advances used in the delivery of course content.
学生满意度极低的物理科学单元中需要改进的共同领域
课程和教学评估问卷(CTEQs)已经成为澳大利亚大学评估教学和学生体验的标准做法。全国结果显示,与其他学科相比,物理科学学科(信息技术、工程和科学)的CTEQs成绩普遍较差。在本文中,学生的反馈进行了专题分析,在物理科学集群的单位,学生体验到需要关键的关注。这些单元于2010年第2学期在莫纳什大学交付。分析显示,物理科学学科的学生最关心的三个问题是讲师演讲、讲座内容和单元组织。这些发现与35年前的研究结果一致,尽管学生的人口结构发生了变化,学习理论取得了进步,课程内容的交付也采用了先进的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信