Anti-Communitarian Construction of Human Rights Provisions and the Problematics of Engineering Social Development in Commonwealth Africa: Ripples from the Nigerian Case of Agbai V. Okogbue.

Njoku Donatus Ikechukwu, Paul Nwodeh
{"title":"Anti-Communitarian Construction of Human Rights Provisions and the Problematics of Engineering Social Development in Commonwealth Africa: Ripples from the Nigerian Case of Agbai V. Okogbue.","authors":"Njoku Donatus Ikechukwu, Paul Nwodeh","doi":"10.59298/idosr/jce/23/10.1.72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In most countries of the world, socio-economic rights are now concrete and enforceable. In Nigeria however, chapter II of the 1999 Constitution has remained non-justiciable, irrespective of the adoption and ratification of the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights, which contains replica of these socio-economic rights. In countries like South Africa, India and some Latin American countries, the socio-economic rights have been given full force of enforcement either by composite construction of constitutionally guaranteed rights to encapsulate socio-economic rights or by expansive interpretation of the Constitution by the courts. Enforcement of socio-economic rights has nonetheless remained a mirage in Nigeria. Successive governments have hidden under the non justiceability of chapter II of the constitution to evade accountability and responsibility especially in provision of life changing infrastructure. This has impelled communities to engineer their own social development via self-help. Enforcement of compliance towards these self-help measures usually clash with the perceived rights of individuals. This paper therefore raises concern on the construction of the rights provisions to stifle communitarian philosophy enhancing social development via communal self-help projects by revisiting the case of Agbai v. Okagbue. It is posited that with recent dwindling government responses especially in rural infrastructural development, the court has to re-engineer communal development by superimposing communal interest over personal interest especially where such communal interest will also further full realization of personal rights. Key Words: Human Rights, Community Development, Communitarian Principle, Realist Theory, Problem and Commonwealth Africa","PeriodicalId":448197,"journal":{"name":"IDOSR JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION AND ENGLISH","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IDOSR JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION AND ENGLISH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59298/idosr/jce/23/10.1.72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In most countries of the world, socio-economic rights are now concrete and enforceable. In Nigeria however, chapter II of the 1999 Constitution has remained non-justiciable, irrespective of the adoption and ratification of the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights, which contains replica of these socio-economic rights. In countries like South Africa, India and some Latin American countries, the socio-economic rights have been given full force of enforcement either by composite construction of constitutionally guaranteed rights to encapsulate socio-economic rights or by expansive interpretation of the Constitution by the courts. Enforcement of socio-economic rights has nonetheless remained a mirage in Nigeria. Successive governments have hidden under the non justiceability of chapter II of the constitution to evade accountability and responsibility especially in provision of life changing infrastructure. This has impelled communities to engineer their own social development via self-help. Enforcement of compliance towards these self-help measures usually clash with the perceived rights of individuals. This paper therefore raises concern on the construction of the rights provisions to stifle communitarian philosophy enhancing social development via communal self-help projects by revisiting the case of Agbai v. Okagbue. It is posited that with recent dwindling government responses especially in rural infrastructural development, the court has to re-engineer communal development by superimposing communal interest over personal interest especially where such communal interest will also further full realization of personal rights. Key Words: Human Rights, Community Development, Communitarian Principle, Realist Theory, Problem and Commonwealth Africa
人权条款的反社群主义建构与英联邦非洲的工程社会发展问题:尼日利亚阿格拜诉奥格布案的涟漪
在世界上大多数国家,社会经济权利现在是具体和可执行的。然而,在尼日利亚,尽管通过和批准了载有这些社会经济权利副本的《非洲人权和人民权利宪章》,1999年《宪法》第二章仍然不可审理。在诸如南非、印度和一些拉丁美洲国家,社会经济权利通过对宪法保障的权利进行综合解释以概括社会经济权利或通过法院对宪法的广泛解释而得到充分的执行力。然而,在尼日利亚,社会经济权利的执行仍然是海市蜃楼。历届政府都躲在宪法第二章的不可审判性之下,逃避问责和责任,尤其是在提供改变生活的基础设施方面。这促使各社区通过自助来规划自己的社会发展。强制执行这些自助措施通常与人们所认为的个人权利相冲突。因此,本文通过重新审视Agbai诉Okagbue案,提出了对权利条款的构建的关注,以扼杀社区主义哲学,通过社区自助项目促进社会发展。有人认为,随着最近政府对农村基础设施发展的反应越来越少,法院必须通过将公共利益叠加在个人利益上来重新设计公共发展,特别是在这种公共利益也将进一步充分实现个人权利的情况下。关键词:人权,社区发展,共同体原则,现实主义理论,问题,英联邦非洲
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信