Context Matters: Influence of Undergraduates’ Approaches, Experiences, and Expectations on the LA Model in large Enrollment Science Courses

Meredith M. Thompson, Anthony P. Barrasso, M. S. Tutwiler, P. Garik, Katheryn Spilios
{"title":"Context Matters: Influence of Undergraduates’ Approaches, Experiences, and Expectations on the LA Model in large Enrollment Science Courses","authors":"Meredith M. Thompson, Anthony P. Barrasso, M. S. Tutwiler, P. Garik, Katheryn Spilios","doi":"10.35745/eiet2022v02.01.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Learning Assistant (LA) model was designed to facilitate the innovative use of active learning in large lecture courses by training and integrating undergraduate near-peer instructors called Learning Assistants (LAs). We analyze the LA model in the context of the course learning activities, their influence on student outcomes, and students’ expectations for the course. We used results from a large-scale survey to model expectations, course activities, and outputs in the form of course satisfaction and final grades, and drew from interviews, classroom observations, and student focus groups to make sense of the model results. Quantitative results revealed a small positive effect of LAs on final grade when only LAs were input into the statistical model. However, when the influence of students’ perceptions of their professor, their teaching fellow (TF), and their own study habits were included, the effect of LAs was mitigated. Qualitative results showed that while undergraduates reported that they felt more comfortable asking LAs questions about course material, many still focused on grades over conceptual understanding. LAs championed small group work more than their teaching partners, but the effectiveness of the LAs to encourage group work was linked to the TF’s approach to teaching. Results suggest that the expectations of the students, teaching staff, and the course activities and assessments can impact the effectiveness of the LA model.","PeriodicalId":165325,"journal":{"name":"Educational Innovations and Emerging Technologies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Innovations and Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35745/eiet2022v02.01.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Learning Assistant (LA) model was designed to facilitate the innovative use of active learning in large lecture courses by training and integrating undergraduate near-peer instructors called Learning Assistants (LAs). We analyze the LA model in the context of the course learning activities, their influence on student outcomes, and students’ expectations for the course. We used results from a large-scale survey to model expectations, course activities, and outputs in the form of course satisfaction and final grades, and drew from interviews, classroom observations, and student focus groups to make sense of the model results. Quantitative results revealed a small positive effect of LAs on final grade when only LAs were input into the statistical model. However, when the influence of students’ perceptions of their professor, their teaching fellow (TF), and their own study habits were included, the effect of LAs was mitigated. Qualitative results showed that while undergraduates reported that they felt more comfortable asking LAs questions about course material, many still focused on grades over conceptual understanding. LAs championed small group work more than their teaching partners, but the effectiveness of the LAs to encourage group work was linked to the TF’s approach to teaching. Results suggest that the expectations of the students, teaching staff, and the course activities and assessments can impact the effectiveness of the LA model.
情境因素:本科生的方法、经验和期望对大规模招生科学课程的LA模式的影响
学习助理(LA)模式旨在通过培训和整合被称为学习助理(LA)的本科生近同伴讲师,促进在大型讲座课程中创新地使用主动学习。我们在课程学习活动的背景下分析了LA模型,它们对学生成绩的影响,以及学生对课程的期望。我们使用大规模调查的结果来模拟期望,课程活动,以及课程满意度和最终成绩形式的输出,并从访谈,课堂观察和学生焦点小组中获取模型结果的意义。定量结果显示,当仅将LAs输入统计模型时,LAs对最终成绩的积极影响很小。然而,当学生对他们的教授,他们的助教(TF)的看法的影响,以及他们自己的学习习惯,LAs的影响被缓解。定性结果显示,尽管本科生报告说,他们更愿意向助教询问有关课程材料的问题,但许多人仍然更关注成绩,而不是概念理解。与他们的教学伙伴相比,助理教师更支持小组合作,但助理教师鼓励小组合作的有效性与助教的教学方法有关。结果表明,学生、教学人员、课程活动和评估的期望会影响LA模式的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信