La lettre et son double : Écrire un moi en partance, ou l’injonction d’Artaud

Gaëla Le Grand
{"title":"La lettre et son double : Écrire un moi en partance, ou l’injonction d’Artaud","authors":"Gaëla Le Grand","doi":"10.4467/23538953ce.22.009.16078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The letter and its duality: writing a departing self or Artaud’s injunctio\n\nArtaud’s work includes a large volume of correspondence, which should be given a special status. Neither a work of art, nor an appendix to the work, the letter becomes an object and a body that makes it possible to read Artaud’s corpus, insofar as it provides us with interpretative keys and forces the reader to go back and forth between letters and other writings. It is a sign of the author’s real presence, and demonstrate the idea of a suffering, dispersed and fragmented body. Paradoxically, it symbolizes the very project of the author: collecting the traces of oneself, inscribing oneself in the pure duration, and supplanting the pain of the spatial environment. The letter is the very movement of writing, conceived then as sheer speed.","PeriodicalId":133418,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers ERTA","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cahiers ERTA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/23538953ce.22.009.16078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The letter and its duality: writing a departing self or Artaud’s injunctio Artaud’s work includes a large volume of correspondence, which should be given a special status. Neither a work of art, nor an appendix to the work, the letter becomes an object and a body that makes it possible to read Artaud’s corpus, insofar as it provides us with interpretative keys and forces the reader to go back and forth between letters and other writings. It is a sign of the author’s real presence, and demonstrate the idea of a suffering, dispersed and fragmented body. Paradoxically, it symbolizes the very project of the author: collecting the traces of oneself, inscribing oneself in the pure duration, and supplanting the pain of the spatial environment. The letter is the very movement of writing, conceived then as sheer speed.
信和它的双重:写一个离开的自我,或阿托的命令
书信及其双重性:写一个离去的自我或亚陶的禁令亚陶的作品中包含了大量的书信,应该被赋予特殊的地位。信件既不是一件艺术作品,也不是作品的附录,它成为一种客体和主体,使我们有可能阅读亚陶的语料库,因为它为我们提供了解释的钥匙,并迫使读者在信件和其他作品之间来回穿梭。这是作者真实存在的标志,并展示了一个痛苦、分散和破碎的身体的概念。矛盾的是,它象征着作者的项目:收集自己的痕迹,将自己铭刻在纯粹的时间里,取代空间环境的痛苦。书信就是写作的运动,在当时被认为是纯粹的速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信