Measuring Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies of Higher Level Learners

Krishna Khatri
{"title":"Measuring Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies of Higher Level Learners","authors":"Krishna Khatri","doi":"10.3126/rupantaran.v5i01.39847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among higher level learners has been widely acknowledged for successful reading comprehension. However, literature shows a little empirical research in this area in Nepalese context. This paper attempts to measure the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies of higher level learners of Nepal. As a quantitative study, cross-sectional survey design was used to obtain the primary data from 142 higher level learners pursuing MPhil degree from different universities of Nepal through questionnaire. The metacognitvie awareness of reading strategies of the learners was measured in univariate analysis and difference of their awareness in terms of independent variables was assessed in bivariate analysis using t-test. The study revealed that higher level learners had metacognitive awareness of reading strategies at different levels. Among the three groups of strategies, cognitive strategies were found most frequently used by the learners and supportive strategies were found least frequent to them. The independent variables i.e. sex and subject of specialization did not affect in the learners’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. The differences were not seen statistically significant. This implies that teacher can use and instruct the learners with similar type of reading strategies irrespective of gender and group of subjects.","PeriodicalId":278254,"journal":{"name":"Rupantaran: A Multidisciplinary Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rupantaran: A Multidisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/rupantaran.v5i01.39847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among higher level learners has been widely acknowledged for successful reading comprehension. However, literature shows a little empirical research in this area in Nepalese context. This paper attempts to measure the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies of higher level learners of Nepal. As a quantitative study, cross-sectional survey design was used to obtain the primary data from 142 higher level learners pursuing MPhil degree from different universities of Nepal through questionnaire. The metacognitvie awareness of reading strategies of the learners was measured in univariate analysis and difference of their awareness in terms of independent variables was assessed in bivariate analysis using t-test. The study revealed that higher level learners had metacognitive awareness of reading strategies at different levels. Among the three groups of strategies, cognitive strategies were found most frequently used by the learners and supportive strategies were found least frequent to them. The independent variables i.e. sex and subject of specialization did not affect in the learners’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. The differences were not seen statistically significant. This implies that teacher can use and instruct the learners with similar type of reading strategies irrespective of gender and group of subjects.
高水平学习者阅读策略元认知意识的测量
高水平学习者对阅读策略的元认知意识已被广泛认为是成功阅读理解的重要因素。然而,文献显示在尼泊尔背景下这方面的实证研究很少。本文试图测量尼泊尔高水平学习者对阅读策略的元认知意识。作为定量研究,本研究采用横断面调查设计,通过问卷调查的方式,对尼泊尔不同大学的142名攻读硕士学位的高等学生进行初步调查。采用单变量分析测量学习者对阅读策略的元认知意识,采用双变量分析采用t检验评估其自变量意识的差异。研究发现,高水平学习者对阅读策略有不同程度的元认知意识。在三组策略中,学习者使用最多的是认知策略,使用最少的是支持策略。性别和专精科目等自变量对学习者阅读策略元认知意识没有影响。这些差异在统计学上并不显著。这意味着教师可以使用并指导学习者使用类似类型的阅读策略,而不受性别和学科群体的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信