Fault Detection with Optimum March Test Algorithm

N. A. Zakaria, W. Hasan, I. Halin, R. Sidek, X. Wen
{"title":"Fault Detection with Optimum March Test Algorithm","authors":"N. A. Zakaria, W. Hasan, I. Halin, R. Sidek, X. Wen","doi":"10.1109/ISMS.2012.88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Integrating a large number of embedded memories in System-on-Chips (SoC's) occupies up to more than 70% of the die size, thus requiring Built-In Self-Test (BIST) with the smallest possible area overhead. This paper analyzes MATS++(6N), March C-(10N), March SR(14N), and March CL(12N) test algorithms and shows that they cannot detect either Write Disturb Faults (WDFs) or Deceptive Read Destructive Faults (DRDFs) or both. Therefore to improve fault detection, an automation program is developed based on sequence operation (SQ) generation rules. However after solving the undetected fault, the outcome in term of its detection result of Static Double Cell Faults using the specified test algorithm especially Transition Coupling Faults (CFtrs), Write Destructive Coupling Faults (CFwds), Read Destructive Coupling Faults (CFrds) and Deceptive Read Destructive Faults (CFdrds) are observed.","PeriodicalId":200002,"journal":{"name":"2012 Third International Conference on Intelligent Systems Modelling and Simulation","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Third International Conference on Intelligent Systems Modelling and Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMS.2012.88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Integrating a large number of embedded memories in System-on-Chips (SoC's) occupies up to more than 70% of the die size, thus requiring Built-In Self-Test (BIST) with the smallest possible area overhead. This paper analyzes MATS++(6N), March C-(10N), March SR(14N), and March CL(12N) test algorithms and shows that they cannot detect either Write Disturb Faults (WDFs) or Deceptive Read Destructive Faults (DRDFs) or both. Therefore to improve fault detection, an automation program is developed based on sequence operation (SQ) generation rules. However after solving the undetected fault, the outcome in term of its detection result of Static Double Cell Faults using the specified test algorithm especially Transition Coupling Faults (CFtrs), Write Destructive Coupling Faults (CFwds), Read Destructive Coupling Faults (CFrds) and Deceptive Read Destructive Faults (CFdrds) are observed.
基于最优三月测试算法的故障检测
将大量嵌入式存储器集成到片上系统(SoC)中占用了超过70%的芯片尺寸,因此需要内置自检(BIST)以尽可能小的面积开销。本文分析了MATS++(6N)、March C-(10N)、March SR(14N)和March CL(12N)测试算法,结果表明它们既不能检测到写干扰故障(WDFs),也不能检测到欺骗性读破坏故障(DRDFs),或者两者兼有。因此,为了提高故障检测的效率,开发了基于序列操作生成规则的自动化程序。然而,在解决了未检测到的故障后,使用指定的测试算法对静态双单元故障,特别是转换耦合故障(CFtrs)、写破坏性耦合故障(CFwds)、读破坏性耦合故障(CFrds)和欺骗性读破坏性故障(CFdrds)的检测结果进行了观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信