The impact of corporate rebranding on brand equity and firm performance

sohini nana, R. Tobias-Mamina, N. Chiliya, Eugine Tafadzwa Maziriri
{"title":"The impact of corporate rebranding on brand equity and firm performance","authors":"sohini nana, R. Tobias-Mamina, N. Chiliya, Eugine Tafadzwa Maziriri","doi":"10.24052/JBRMR/V13IS04/ART-08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rebranding has become a very important strategic tool for companies wanting to succeed in this evercompetitive business world using the principles of rebranding. Companies may occasionally discover that they may have to re-position the brand because customers change preferences and new competitors enter the market. Moreover, a strong brand enhances positive evaluations of a product’s quality, maintains a high level of product awareness, and provides a consistent image or brand personality. To keep up with fierce competition, companies may seek to transform their business due to changing business directions or adding extra business units. The main purpose of this study was therefore, to investigate the influence of rebranding on brand equity and firm performance. This study was quantitative in nature. Data were collected from 372 respondents using anonymously completed questionnaires. Research scales were operationalised on the basis of previous work. Proper modifications were made in order to fit the research context and purpose. “Rebranding” measure used five-item scales; “Store Layout” used a five item scale measure; “Franchising” used three item measure, “Brand Equity”; “ Perceived Quality “, “Brand Associations and Attributes” and “Firm Performance” all used a five item scale measure while “an customer experience ” used a six item scale measure. All measurement items were measure on a five-point Likert-type scale that was anchored by 1=strongly agree to 5= strongly disagree to express degree of agreement. The seven posited hypotheses were empirically tested. The results supported three hypotheses in a significant way and rejected four hypotheses. Important to note about the study findings is the fact that rebranding has no effect on the firm’s brand equity although brand equity has an influence on the firm’s performance. Notably too, the relationship between customer experience and firm performance is robust. This finding indicates that brand equity can have a strong influence without the influence of rebranding. A major implication for this study is that rebranding is a risky operation that needs to be carefully managed. Corresponding author: Eugine Tafadzwa Maziriri Email addresses for the corresponding author: eugine.maziriri@gmail.com First submission received: 7th October 2018 Revised submission received: 30th January 2019 Accepted: 2nd April 2019 1.0 Introduction In today’s day and time, tremendous emphasis is placed on moving from line branding to corporate branding. The management approach for corporate branding needs to be better appreciated as it differs from line branding (Harris & Chernatony, 2001). The need for rebranding has become an important marketing and strategic tool for corporations wanting to succeed in this ever-competitive business world (Moisescu & Vu, 2011). Re-positioning a brand occurs when customer preference changes arise, and new competitors enter the market. Having a strong brand enhances positive evaluations of a product’s quality, maintains a high level of product awareness, and provides a consistent image or brand personality (Petburikul, 2009). Revitalising and repositioning a brand though progressive modification of the brand proposition in a total aesthetic experience, can be considered an expected undertaking of brand Journal of Business and Retail Management Research (JBRMR), Vol. 13 Issue 4 July 2019 www.jbrmr.com A Journal of the Academy of Business and Retail Management (ABRM) 94 management in response to changing market conditions. This paper focuses on the phenomenon of rebranding, as evidenced by a change of store image, and its influence on brand equity and business performance. It sets out to understand the drivers of the firm performance phenomenon and to analyse the impact of rebranding strategies on corporate equity and performance of an SME within the fast food industry in South Africa. The activities of SME enterprises in South Africa are of fundamental importance for the promotion of economic growth, job creation and poverty alleviation. In South Africa, it is estimated that 91% of the formal business entities are SME’s. These contribute 52 to 57 % of the GDP and 61% to employment (Abor & Quartey, 2010). Previous authors have researched on the fast food industry in various contexts by focusing on corporate social responsibility (Schrempf, 2014); media character branding (Dixon, Niven, Scully & Wakefield, 2017) and effect of social media advertisements on brand equity (Hanaysha, 2016). Premised on the identified research gap, the current study seeks to investigate the influence of rebranding strategies on brand equity and firm performance in South Africa’s fast food industry. Above all, the current study is expected to make academic and practical contributions to the existing branding literature and practice of rebranding in developing countries, particularly in South Africa. Research context The growth of SME’s (small to medium enterprises) in a highly competitive, low margin market, coupled with continuously increasing raw costs and fuel costs, is proving to be a challenge with which many businesses are faced (Lee et al., 2016). The SME is simply unable to compete in a market that is dominated by well-established high-volume manufacturers. The general South African consumer is brand driven, price conscious, as well as quality and service orientated. The South African food industry specifically, is a mine field where the consumer is spoilt for choice. If the SME does not tick all the boxes, they simply cease to exist and hence the reason for failure is due to the inability and inexperience of the owners (Standard Bank, 2014). The SME under current study specialises in savory snacks. Being a family owned business and remotely managed operation consisting of 54 retail stores, poses many hurdles. Uniformity and consistency in corporate identity, in-store day-to-day retail management, poor customer service, lack of mentorship, KPI analysis and training and inconsistencies in quality are issues which are resulting in the degradation of the overall brand equity and retardation of the brand’s performance (Lee et al., 2016). However, this can be remedied through universal rebranding; franchising; setting and evaluating of the key performance indicators; soliciting the service of mystery shopper to assess service level and internal customer motivation. The food outlet under study is fully funded and solely grown by its own internal retail net profit pool. Due to high fuel cost constraints and poor retail management, it is simply not economically viable to distribute products to all its outlets across the country. Furthermore, landlords in the mainstream retail sector simply do not want to carry the risk of having to lease out their retail space to marginally established SME’s. These factors impact on the firm’s market share. In the light of the above, this study seeks to determine if the rebranding efforts have improved firm performance. 1.1. Conceptual model and hypothesis development A conceptual model describes the relationship between variables investigated in the study (Maziriri and Chuchu, 2017; Maziriri, Mapuranga & Madinga, 2018). In order to empirically test the interrelationships between store layout and franchising on rebranding; perceived quality and brand association and attributes on brand equity, customer experience and firm performance, a conceptual model is developed, premised on the reviewed marketing and particularly, brand management literature. In this conceptualised model, firm performance is the single outcome variable. Figure 1 illustrates this conceptualised research model. The hypothesised relationships between the research constructs is subsequently discussed. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research (JBRMR), Vol. 13 Issue 4 July 2019 www.jbrmr.com A Journal of the Academy of Business and Retail Management (ABRM) 95 Figure 1: Conceptual Framework This section derives hypotheses from the conceptual framework shown in Figure 1. This article argues that store layout and franchising influence customers’ perception about a rebranded firm with which they deal, leading them to associate their perceptions with the brands they intend to purchase, thus developing brand equity, resulting in positive firm performance. 1.2. Store Layout and Rebranding Store layout is considered a fundamental factor that drives consumer movement and purchase reaction (Ghosh et al., 2010). Currently, companies tend to focus on creating a reverberating store image instead of evolving the image of products. The emblematic, observed expression of the way consumers “picture” or “visualise” a store, is by the store image (Saraswat, et al., 2010). Once the customers experience and adopt the image, there is a clear reason to understand that once the consumers are likely to feel comfortable, consumers will begin to accept the store which is in sync with their lifestyle, purchase the items that reflect their taste and necessities of what they wish to eat, wear, give to others, and furnish their homes with (Saraswat, et al., 2010). Therefore, store image provides value-added benefits to the consumers. Layout is an important factor in rebranding as it influences both the customer experience and the speed of shopping (Ghosh et al., 2010). Based on the literature, the relationship between store layout and rebranding is hypothesised as follows: H1: Change in store layout has a positive influence on rebranding. 2.2 Rebranding and franchising The need for rebranding has become an important marketing and strategic tool for corporations wanting to succeed in this endlessly competitive business world (Moisescu &Vu, 2011). With regards to the literature on brand management, rebranding strategies have received limited academic attention (Plewa, et al., 2011). Rebranding is a marketing transformation practice that can be defined and characterised in different ways (Plewa, et al","PeriodicalId":236465,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business & Retail Management Research","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business & Retail Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24052/JBRMR/V13IS04/ART-08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Rebranding has become a very important strategic tool for companies wanting to succeed in this evercompetitive business world using the principles of rebranding. Companies may occasionally discover that they may have to re-position the brand because customers change preferences and new competitors enter the market. Moreover, a strong brand enhances positive evaluations of a product’s quality, maintains a high level of product awareness, and provides a consistent image or brand personality. To keep up with fierce competition, companies may seek to transform their business due to changing business directions or adding extra business units. The main purpose of this study was therefore, to investigate the influence of rebranding on brand equity and firm performance. This study was quantitative in nature. Data were collected from 372 respondents using anonymously completed questionnaires. Research scales were operationalised on the basis of previous work. Proper modifications were made in order to fit the research context and purpose. “Rebranding” measure used five-item scales; “Store Layout” used a five item scale measure; “Franchising” used three item measure, “Brand Equity”; “ Perceived Quality “, “Brand Associations and Attributes” and “Firm Performance” all used a five item scale measure while “an customer experience ” used a six item scale measure. All measurement items were measure on a five-point Likert-type scale that was anchored by 1=strongly agree to 5= strongly disagree to express degree of agreement. The seven posited hypotheses were empirically tested. The results supported three hypotheses in a significant way and rejected four hypotheses. Important to note about the study findings is the fact that rebranding has no effect on the firm’s brand equity although brand equity has an influence on the firm’s performance. Notably too, the relationship between customer experience and firm performance is robust. This finding indicates that brand equity can have a strong influence without the influence of rebranding. A major implication for this study is that rebranding is a risky operation that needs to be carefully managed. Corresponding author: Eugine Tafadzwa Maziriri Email addresses for the corresponding author: eugine.maziriri@gmail.com First submission received: 7th October 2018 Revised submission received: 30th January 2019 Accepted: 2nd April 2019 1.0 Introduction In today’s day and time, tremendous emphasis is placed on moving from line branding to corporate branding. The management approach for corporate branding needs to be better appreciated as it differs from line branding (Harris & Chernatony, 2001). The need for rebranding has become an important marketing and strategic tool for corporations wanting to succeed in this ever-competitive business world (Moisescu & Vu, 2011). Re-positioning a brand occurs when customer preference changes arise, and new competitors enter the market. Having a strong brand enhances positive evaluations of a product’s quality, maintains a high level of product awareness, and provides a consistent image or brand personality (Petburikul, 2009). Revitalising and repositioning a brand though progressive modification of the brand proposition in a total aesthetic experience, can be considered an expected undertaking of brand Journal of Business and Retail Management Research (JBRMR), Vol. 13 Issue 4 July 2019 www.jbrmr.com A Journal of the Academy of Business and Retail Management (ABRM) 94 management in response to changing market conditions. This paper focuses on the phenomenon of rebranding, as evidenced by a change of store image, and its influence on brand equity and business performance. It sets out to understand the drivers of the firm performance phenomenon and to analyse the impact of rebranding strategies on corporate equity and performance of an SME within the fast food industry in South Africa. The activities of SME enterprises in South Africa are of fundamental importance for the promotion of economic growth, job creation and poverty alleviation. In South Africa, it is estimated that 91% of the formal business entities are SME’s. These contribute 52 to 57 % of the GDP and 61% to employment (Abor & Quartey, 2010). Previous authors have researched on the fast food industry in various contexts by focusing on corporate social responsibility (Schrempf, 2014); media character branding (Dixon, Niven, Scully & Wakefield, 2017) and effect of social media advertisements on brand equity (Hanaysha, 2016). Premised on the identified research gap, the current study seeks to investigate the influence of rebranding strategies on brand equity and firm performance in South Africa’s fast food industry. Above all, the current study is expected to make academic and practical contributions to the existing branding literature and practice of rebranding in developing countries, particularly in South Africa. Research context The growth of SME’s (small to medium enterprises) in a highly competitive, low margin market, coupled with continuously increasing raw costs and fuel costs, is proving to be a challenge with which many businesses are faced (Lee et al., 2016). The SME is simply unable to compete in a market that is dominated by well-established high-volume manufacturers. The general South African consumer is brand driven, price conscious, as well as quality and service orientated. The South African food industry specifically, is a mine field where the consumer is spoilt for choice. If the SME does not tick all the boxes, they simply cease to exist and hence the reason for failure is due to the inability and inexperience of the owners (Standard Bank, 2014). The SME under current study specialises in savory snacks. Being a family owned business and remotely managed operation consisting of 54 retail stores, poses many hurdles. Uniformity and consistency in corporate identity, in-store day-to-day retail management, poor customer service, lack of mentorship, KPI analysis and training and inconsistencies in quality are issues which are resulting in the degradation of the overall brand equity and retardation of the brand’s performance (Lee et al., 2016). However, this can be remedied through universal rebranding; franchising; setting and evaluating of the key performance indicators; soliciting the service of mystery shopper to assess service level and internal customer motivation. The food outlet under study is fully funded and solely grown by its own internal retail net profit pool. Due to high fuel cost constraints and poor retail management, it is simply not economically viable to distribute products to all its outlets across the country. Furthermore, landlords in the mainstream retail sector simply do not want to carry the risk of having to lease out their retail space to marginally established SME’s. These factors impact on the firm’s market share. In the light of the above, this study seeks to determine if the rebranding efforts have improved firm performance. 1.1. Conceptual model and hypothesis development A conceptual model describes the relationship between variables investigated in the study (Maziriri and Chuchu, 2017; Maziriri, Mapuranga & Madinga, 2018). In order to empirically test the interrelationships between store layout and franchising on rebranding; perceived quality and brand association and attributes on brand equity, customer experience and firm performance, a conceptual model is developed, premised on the reviewed marketing and particularly, brand management literature. In this conceptualised model, firm performance is the single outcome variable. Figure 1 illustrates this conceptualised research model. The hypothesised relationships between the research constructs is subsequently discussed. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research (JBRMR), Vol. 13 Issue 4 July 2019 www.jbrmr.com A Journal of the Academy of Business and Retail Management (ABRM) 95 Figure 1: Conceptual Framework This section derives hypotheses from the conceptual framework shown in Figure 1. This article argues that store layout and franchising influence customers’ perception about a rebranded firm with which they deal, leading them to associate their perceptions with the brands they intend to purchase, thus developing brand equity, resulting in positive firm performance. 1.2. Store Layout and Rebranding Store layout is considered a fundamental factor that drives consumer movement and purchase reaction (Ghosh et al., 2010). Currently, companies tend to focus on creating a reverberating store image instead of evolving the image of products. The emblematic, observed expression of the way consumers “picture” or “visualise” a store, is by the store image (Saraswat, et al., 2010). Once the customers experience and adopt the image, there is a clear reason to understand that once the consumers are likely to feel comfortable, consumers will begin to accept the store which is in sync with their lifestyle, purchase the items that reflect their taste and necessities of what they wish to eat, wear, give to others, and furnish their homes with (Saraswat, et al., 2010). Therefore, store image provides value-added benefits to the consumers. Layout is an important factor in rebranding as it influences both the customer experience and the speed of shopping (Ghosh et al., 2010). Based on the literature, the relationship between store layout and rebranding is hypothesised as follows: H1: Change in store layout has a positive influence on rebranding. 2.2 Rebranding and franchising The need for rebranding has become an important marketing and strategic tool for corporations wanting to succeed in this endlessly competitive business world (Moisescu &Vu, 2011). With regards to the literature on brand management, rebranding strategies have received limited academic attention (Plewa, et al., 2011). Rebranding is a marketing transformation practice that can be defined and characterised in different ways (Plewa, et al
企业品牌重塑对品牌资产和企业绩效的影响
中小企业(中小企业)在竞争激烈、利润率低的市场中的增长,加上原材料成本和燃料成本的不断增加,被证明是许多企业面临的挑战(Lee等人,2016)。中小企业根本无法在一个由成熟的大批量制造商主导的市场上竞争。一般南非消费者是品牌驱动,价格意识,以及质量和服务为导向。特别是南非的食品行业,是一个雷区,消费者有太多的选择。如果中小企业没有勾选所有的复选框,它们就会不复存在,因此失败的原因是由于所有者的无能和缺乏经验(标准银行,2014)。目前正在研究的中小企业专门从事咸味小吃。作为一家由54家零售店组成的家族企业和远程管理的企业,这带来了许多障碍。企业形象的统一性和一致性,店内日常零售管理,糟糕的客户服务,缺乏指导,KPI分析和培训以及质量不一致是导致整体品牌资产退化和品牌绩效滞后的问题(Lee et al., 2016)。然而,这可以通过普遍的品牌重塑来弥补;特许经营;设定和评估关键绩效指标;邀请神秘顾客服务,评估服务水平和内部顾客动机。所研究的食品店资金充足,完全由其内部零售净利润池发展。由于高昂的燃料成本限制和糟糕的零售管理,将产品分销到全国各地的所有网点在经济上根本不可行。此外,主流零售行业的业主根本不想承担不得不将零售空间出租给边缘中小企业的风险。这些因素影响着公司的市场份额。鉴于上述情况,本研究试图确定品牌重塑是否改善了公司绩效。1.1. 概念模型描述了研究中所调查变量之间的关系(Maziriri and Chuchu, 2017;Maziriri, Mapuranga & Madinga, 2018)。为了实证检验品牌重塑过程中店面布局与特许经营的相互关系;感知质量和品牌关联以及品牌资产,客户体验和公司绩效的属性,开发了一个概念模型,以回顾营销,特别是品牌管理文献为前提。在这个概念化的模型中,企业绩效是唯一的结果变量。图1说明了这个概念化的研究模型。随后讨论了研究构式之间的假设关系。商业与零售管理研究杂志(JBRMR),第13卷第4期2019年7月www.jbrmr.com商业与零售管理学会杂志(ABRM) 95图1:概念框架本节从图1所示的概念框架中得出假设。本文认为,店面布局和特许经营会影响顾客对与其交易的品牌重塑公司的看法,导致他们将自己的看法与他们打算购买的品牌联系起来,从而发展品牌资产,从而产生积极的公司绩效。1.2. 商店布局被认为是驱动消费者运动和购买反应的基本因素(Ghosh et al., 2010)。目前,公司倾向于创造一个回响的商店形象,而不是发展产品形象。消费者“描绘”或“可视化”商店的方式的象征性、观察性表达是通过商店形象(Saraswat等人,2010)。一旦消费者体验并采用了这种形象,有一个明确的理由可以理解,一旦消费者可能感到舒适,消费者将开始接受与他们的生活方式同步的商店,购买反映他们的品味和必需品的物品,他们希望吃,穿,给别人,并装饰他们的家(Saraswat, et al., 2010)。因此,店铺形象为消费者提供了增值效益。布局是重塑品牌的一个重要因素,因为它会影响客户体验和购物速度(Ghosh等人,2010)。基于文献,我们假设店铺布局与品牌重塑的关系如下:H1:店铺布局的变化对品牌重塑有正向影响。品牌重塑和特许经营对于想要在这个竞争激烈的商业世界中取得成功的公司来说,品牌重塑已经成为一种重要的营销和战略工具(Moisescu &Vu, 2011)。关于品牌管理的文献,品牌重塑策略得到了有限的学术关注(Plewa等人,2011)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信