Interorganizational Network Portfolios of Nonprofit Organizations: Implications for Collaboration Management

J. Fu, Katherine R. Cooper
{"title":"Interorganizational Network Portfolios of Nonprofit Organizations: Implications for Collaboration Management","authors":"J. Fu, Katherine R. Cooper","doi":"10.1002/nml.21438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasingly, nonprofit organizations engage in inter-organizational collaboration to address large-scale social problems. Scholarship typically focuses on the characteristics of both within-sector and cross-sector partnerships of two collaborating organizations or all partnering organizations involved in a collaboration, but we know little about the patterns of inter-organizational relationships that single nonprofit organizations maintain. This research draws upon surveys from 452 nonprofits and introduces nonprofit network portfolios, which we define as the number, integration, intensity, and duration of relationships that nonprofits purposefully develop with other organizations. Using 12 network measures, Ward cluster analysis revealed three distinct network portfolios: restricted within-sector (n = 319, 70.58%), which included limited collaboration and prioritized within-sector partnerships; robust within-sector (n = 80, 17.70%), which included more nonprofit partnerships than restricted within-sector portfolios; and cross-sector (n = 53, 11.72%), which had a rich assemblage of integrative partnerships with nonprofits, businesses, and government agencies. Further, nonprofits that maintained each type of portfolio differed in their revenue and social mission, suggesting these factors are related to the types of collaboration that nonprofits maintain. This study makes contributions to existing research on inter-organizational networks and cross-sector collaboration and suggests practical and policy implications for nonprofit network management.","PeriodicalId":105736,"journal":{"name":"Organizations & Markets: Policies & Processes eJournal","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizations & Markets: Policies & Processes eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Increasingly, nonprofit organizations engage in inter-organizational collaboration to address large-scale social problems. Scholarship typically focuses on the characteristics of both within-sector and cross-sector partnerships of two collaborating organizations or all partnering organizations involved in a collaboration, but we know little about the patterns of inter-organizational relationships that single nonprofit organizations maintain. This research draws upon surveys from 452 nonprofits and introduces nonprofit network portfolios, which we define as the number, integration, intensity, and duration of relationships that nonprofits purposefully develop with other organizations. Using 12 network measures, Ward cluster analysis revealed three distinct network portfolios: restricted within-sector (n = 319, 70.58%), which included limited collaboration and prioritized within-sector partnerships; robust within-sector (n = 80, 17.70%), which included more nonprofit partnerships than restricted within-sector portfolios; and cross-sector (n = 53, 11.72%), which had a rich assemblage of integrative partnerships with nonprofits, businesses, and government agencies. Further, nonprofits that maintained each type of portfolio differed in their revenue and social mission, suggesting these factors are related to the types of collaboration that nonprofits maintain. This study makes contributions to existing research on inter-organizational networks and cross-sector collaboration and suggests practical and policy implications for nonprofit network management.
非营利组织的组织间网络组合:协作管理的含义
越来越多的非营利组织通过组织间合作来解决大规模的社会问题。学术界通常关注两个合作组织或参与合作的所有合作组织的部门内和跨部门伙伴关系的特征,但我们对单个非营利组织维持的组织间关系模式知之甚少。本研究借鉴了来自452家非营利组织的调查,并介绍了非营利组织网络组合,我们将其定义为非营利组织与其他组织有目的地发展的关系的数量、整合程度、强度和持续时间。使用12个网络度量,Ward聚类分析揭示了三种不同的网络组合:受限的部门内网络(n = 319, 70.58%),包括有限的合作和优先的部门内伙伴关系;稳健的部门内(n = 80, 17.70%),其中包括更多的非营利合作伙伴关系,而不是受限制的部门内投资组合;跨部门(n = 53, 11.72%),与非营利组织、企业和政府机构建立了丰富的综合伙伴关系。此外,维持每种类型组合的非营利组织在收入和社会使命方面有所不同,这表明这些因素与非营利组织维持的合作类型有关。本研究对组织间网络和跨部门协作的现有研究有所贡献,并对非营利组织网络管理的实践和政策意义提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信