Improving ethical usage of corporate data in higher education: Enhanced Enterprise Data Ethics Framework

T. McNicol, Bailey Carthouser, Ivano Bongiovanni, Sasenka Abeysooriya
{"title":"Improving ethical usage of corporate data in higher education: Enhanced Enterprise Data Ethics Framework","authors":"T. McNicol, Bailey Carthouser, Ivano Bongiovanni, Sasenka Abeysooriya","doi":"10.1108/itp-12-2022-0971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this study is to address the generalised lack of guidance on ethical treatment of corporate (e.g. non-research) data in higher education institutions, by focusing on the case of the University of Queensland (Brisbane, Australia). No actionable framework is currently available in the country to govern the ethical usage of corporate data. As such, this research takes a stakeholder-centred approach to data ethics; the lived experience of the stakeholders involved coupled with a theory-based ethical framework allowed the authors build to build a framework to guide ethical data practice.Design/methodology/approachAdopting a revised canonical action research approach focused on intervention on the context, the authors conducted a review of the literature on ethical usage of data in higher education institutions; administered one survey to university students (n = 168); and facilitated three workshops with professional staff (two) and students (one).FindingsCollected data highlighted how, among other themes, the role and ethical importance of transparency was the dominant claim among all stakeholder groups. Findings helped the authors develop an Enhanced Enterprise Data Ethics Framework (EEDEF) emphasising transparency and stakeholder-centricity.Practical implicationsLegislation is the driver to regulate the use of corporate data in higher education; however, this can be problematic because legislation is retrospective, lacks normativity and offers scarce directions for cases that do not exactly follow within the legislative mandate. In light of these regulatory limitations, the authors’ EEDEF offers operators guidance on how to ethically manage corporate data in the higher education environment.Originality/valueThis study fills gaps in praxis and theory; that is the lack of literature and guiding ethical frameworks to inform data practice in higher education. This research fosters a more ethical data management by virtue of genuine and authentic engagement with stakeholders and emphasises the importance of strategic decision-making and maturity of data culture in the higher education sector.","PeriodicalId":168000,"journal":{"name":"Information Technology & People","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Technology & People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-12-2022-0971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to address the generalised lack of guidance on ethical treatment of corporate (e.g. non-research) data in higher education institutions, by focusing on the case of the University of Queensland (Brisbane, Australia). No actionable framework is currently available in the country to govern the ethical usage of corporate data. As such, this research takes a stakeholder-centred approach to data ethics; the lived experience of the stakeholders involved coupled with a theory-based ethical framework allowed the authors build to build a framework to guide ethical data practice.Design/methodology/approachAdopting a revised canonical action research approach focused on intervention on the context, the authors conducted a review of the literature on ethical usage of data in higher education institutions; administered one survey to university students (n = 168); and facilitated three workshops with professional staff (two) and students (one).FindingsCollected data highlighted how, among other themes, the role and ethical importance of transparency was the dominant claim among all stakeholder groups. Findings helped the authors develop an Enhanced Enterprise Data Ethics Framework (EEDEF) emphasising transparency and stakeholder-centricity.Practical implicationsLegislation is the driver to regulate the use of corporate data in higher education; however, this can be problematic because legislation is retrospective, lacks normativity and offers scarce directions for cases that do not exactly follow within the legislative mandate. In light of these regulatory limitations, the authors’ EEDEF offers operators guidance on how to ethically manage corporate data in the higher education environment.Originality/valueThis study fills gaps in praxis and theory; that is the lack of literature and guiding ethical frameworks to inform data practice in higher education. This research fosters a more ethical data management by virtue of genuine and authentic engagement with stakeholders and emphasises the importance of strategic decision-making and maturity of data culture in the higher education sector.
提高高等教育中企业数据的伦理使用:增强的企业数据伦理框架
本研究的目的是通过关注昆士兰大学(澳大利亚布里斯班)的案例,解决高等教育机构对企业(例如非研究)数据的伦理处理普遍缺乏指导的问题。该国目前没有可操作的框架来管理企业数据的道德使用。因此,本研究采用以利益相关者为中心的数据伦理方法;相关利益相关者的生活经验与基于理论的伦理框架相结合,使作者能够建立一个框架来指导伦理数据实践。设计/方法/方法采用一种修订后的规范行动研究方法,重点关注背景干预,作者对高等教育机构数据伦理使用的文献进行了回顾;对大学生进行问卷调查(n = 168);并举办了三次由专业人员(两次)和学生(一次)参加的讲习班。调查结果收集到的数据强调,在其他主题中,透明度的作用和道德重要性是所有利益相关者群体的主要诉求。研究结果帮助作者开发了一个强调透明度和以利益相关者为中心的增强型企业数据道德框架(EEDEF)。实际意义立法是规范高等教育中企业数据使用的驱动力;然而,这可能是有问题的,因为立法是追溯性的,缺乏规范性,并且对没有完全遵循立法授权的案件提供很少的指导。鉴于这些监管限制,作者的EEDEF为运营商提供了如何在高等教育环境中道德地管理企业数据的指导。原创性/价值本研究填补了实践与理论的空白;这就是缺乏文献和指导道德框架来指导高等教育中的数据实践。本研究通过与利益相关者的真诚和真实的接触,促进了更合乎道德的数据管理,并强调了高等教育部门战略决策和数据文化成熟度的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信