The Importance of Maintaining Simplicity in Planning and Preparation for Major Accidents and Disasters

S. Lennquist
{"title":"The Importance of Maintaining Simplicity in Planning and Preparation for Major Accidents and Disasters","authors":"S. Lennquist","doi":"10.1080/15031430410026758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disaster medicine is still a young discipline. Half a century ago very few people, the military organization as a natural exception, did not recognize any need of planning and preparation for a sudden exposure to a high number of traumatized or critically ill patients. The general and accepted philosophy was that good skills in 'normal' management of trauma and critical care was sufficient for the medical profession. The capacity of the major hospitals was also until the end of the 20th Century usually sufficient to receive an additional high number of casualties. As an example, textbooks in disaster medicine stated that 50 percent of the beds in a major hospital could be rapidly available by sending home patients who could manage without in-patient care. While this might have been true at the time, this is certainly not the case now. Today, especially in high-tech countries, hospital facilities are, or at least should be, optimally utilized 24 hours a day, the 'reserve capacity' being minimal or non-existing. This editorial describes the current state of hospital system disaster planning and makes recommendations for a renewed planning process.","PeriodicalId":257480,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Disaster Medicine","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Disaster Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15031430410026758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Disaster medicine is still a young discipline. Half a century ago very few people, the military organization as a natural exception, did not recognize any need of planning and preparation for a sudden exposure to a high number of traumatized or critically ill patients. The general and accepted philosophy was that good skills in 'normal' management of trauma and critical care was sufficient for the medical profession. The capacity of the major hospitals was also until the end of the 20th Century usually sufficient to receive an additional high number of casualties. As an example, textbooks in disaster medicine stated that 50 percent of the beds in a major hospital could be rapidly available by sending home patients who could manage without in-patient care. While this might have been true at the time, this is certainly not the case now. Today, especially in high-tech countries, hospital facilities are, or at least should be, optimally utilized 24 hours a day, the 'reserve capacity' being minimal or non-existing. This editorial describes the current state of hospital system disaster planning and makes recommendations for a renewed planning process.
在重大事故和灾难的计划和准备中保持简单的重要性
灾难医学仍然是一门年轻的学科。半个世纪以前,很少有人,军事组织自然是一个例外,不认识到有必要对突然暴露在大量创伤或危重病人面前的情况进行计划和准备。一般和公认的理念是,良好的技能在“正常”管理创伤和重症监护是足够的医疗专业。直到20世纪末,大医院的能力通常也足以接收额外的大量伤亡。例如,灾难医学教科书上说,一家大医院50%的床位可以通过让病人回家来迅速使用,这些病人不需要住院治疗就可以自理。虽然这在当时可能是正确的,但现在肯定不是这样。今天,特别是在高科技国家,医院设施是,或至少应该是,一天24小时最佳利用,"储备能力"很少或根本不存在。这篇社论描述了医院系统灾害规划的现状,并提出了更新规划过程的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信