{"title":"PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS","authors":"Zh.I. Sarieva","doi":"10.52123/1994-2370-2022-731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with building a public administration system based on the implementation of project management. The article defines the role, place and possibilities of application of project management in public administration. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the identification and analysis of the most significant problems today related to project management in public administration. In this study, methods of qualitative, quantitative and multi-criteria analysis, as well as methods of systematization and generalization were used. When writing the article, we used methods: analysis, comparison. The author proposes ways to create favorable conditions for the effective use of project management in the state structure, among which are increasing the knowledge of employees, improving the office work system, the regulatory framework, and peer review of projects according to the five-criteria methodology. 1 criterion - economic and financial part of the project; 2nd criterion - the social part of the project; 3rd criterion - the political part of the project; 4th criterion - the cultural part of the project; Criterion 5 - the environmental part of the project. The main conclusion of the study is the identification and use of the most significant scientific approaches, methodologies and best organizational management practices in public administration, which allows clarifying the reasons for the failure of some projects, as well as improving the quality of assessing the level of government projects. This makes it possible to adapt the proposed methodology to the evaluation of specific government projects.","PeriodicalId":101499,"journal":{"name":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND CIVIL SERVICE","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND CIVIL SERVICE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52123/1994-2370-2022-731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article deals with building a public administration system based on the implementation of project management. The article defines the role, place and possibilities of application of project management in public administration. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the identification and analysis of the most significant problems today related to project management in public administration. In this study, methods of qualitative, quantitative and multi-criteria analysis, as well as methods of systematization and generalization were used. When writing the article, we used methods: analysis, comparison. The author proposes ways to create favorable conditions for the effective use of project management in the state structure, among which are increasing the knowledge of employees, improving the office work system, the regulatory framework, and peer review of projects according to the five-criteria methodology. 1 criterion - economic and financial part of the project; 2nd criterion - the social part of the project; 3rd criterion - the political part of the project; 4th criterion - the cultural part of the project; Criterion 5 - the environmental part of the project. The main conclusion of the study is the identification and use of the most significant scientific approaches, methodologies and best organizational management practices in public administration, which allows clarifying the reasons for the failure of some projects, as well as improving the quality of assessing the level of government projects. This makes it possible to adapt the proposed methodology to the evaluation of specific government projects.