Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) Works in the Stock Market of Bangladesh: Empirical Evidence from Sector-Wise Index of Chittagong Stock Exchange (CSE)
{"title":"Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) Works in the Stock Market of Bangladesh: Empirical Evidence from Sector-Wise Index of Chittagong Stock Exchange (CSE)","authors":"Md. Siraz Meah, Mohammad Monzur Morshed Bhuiya","doi":"10.51983/ajms-2023.12.2.3646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study examines the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) in Chittagong Stock Exchange (CSE) with special orientation to 10 different sector indexes. They are such as Banking sector index, Energy sector index, Ceramic sector index, Food sector index, General Insurance sector index, Life Insurance sector index, Cement sector index, Leasing and Finance sector index, Textile sector index, ICT sector index of Chittagong Stock Exchange (CSE). Data were gathered from the Chittagong Stock Exchange (CSE) website (www.cse.combd) for the time frame of July 2016 to June 2019. From Bangladesh’s central bank website (www.centralbank.combd), the risk-free return (Rf) has been gathered. The study uses year-end closing price and dividend for 92 listed companies. The expected return is measured through Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), which is developed by William Sharpe (1964). For analysis the data, Mean, percentage, ANOVA, ‘t’ test are used as statistical tools. Descriptive and Regression analysis have been done to find the results. The study is only confined to CSE. So, there is an avenue for further researchers to add Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE) in their research project. This approach is applicable to both investors and issuers when exchanging shares of securities on the stock market. The study concludes that the CAPM is not applicable to the 10 distinct sector indices of the CSE because, at a typical level of risk, the gap between expected and actual returns is quite large. Hence, CAPM was tested separately for each year of the five years period and the results in the mentioned tables did not support the CAPM applicability.","PeriodicalId":191546,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Managerial Science","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Managerial Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51983/ajms-2023.12.2.3646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The present study examines the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) in Chittagong Stock Exchange (CSE) with special orientation to 10 different sector indexes. They are such as Banking sector index, Energy sector index, Ceramic sector index, Food sector index, General Insurance sector index, Life Insurance sector index, Cement sector index, Leasing and Finance sector index, Textile sector index, ICT sector index of Chittagong Stock Exchange (CSE). Data were gathered from the Chittagong Stock Exchange (CSE) website (www.cse.combd) for the time frame of July 2016 to June 2019. From Bangladesh’s central bank website (www.centralbank.combd), the risk-free return (Rf) has been gathered. The study uses year-end closing price and dividend for 92 listed companies. The expected return is measured through Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), which is developed by William Sharpe (1964). For analysis the data, Mean, percentage, ANOVA, ‘t’ test are used as statistical tools. Descriptive and Regression analysis have been done to find the results. The study is only confined to CSE. So, there is an avenue for further researchers to add Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE) in their research project. This approach is applicable to both investors and issuers when exchanging shares of securities on the stock market. The study concludes that the CAPM is not applicable to the 10 distinct sector indices of the CSE because, at a typical level of risk, the gap between expected and actual returns is quite large. Hence, CAPM was tested separately for each year of the five years period and the results in the mentioned tables did not support the CAPM applicability.
本研究针对吉大港证券交易所(CSE)的资本资产定价模型(CAPM),特别针对10个不同的行业指数进行检验。它们包括银行部门指数、能源部门指数、陶瓷部门指数、食品部门指数、一般保险部门指数、人寿保险部门指数、水泥部门指数、租赁和金融部门指数、纺织部门指数、吉大港证券交易所(CSE)的ICT部门指数。数据收集自吉大港证券交易所(CSE)网站(www.cse.combd),时间范围为2016年7月至2019年6月。从孟加拉国央行的网站(www.centralbank.combd)上,已经收集了无风险回报(Rf)。本研究使用92家上市公司的年终收盘价和股息。预期收益是通过资本资产定价模型(CAPM)来衡量的,CAPM是由William Sharpe(1964)提出的。对于数据的分析,使用均值,百分比,方差分析,' t '检验作为统计工具。对结果进行了描述分析和回归分析。该研究仅局限于CSE。因此,进一步的研究人员可以在他们的研究项目中加入达卡证券交易所(DSE)。这种方法既适用于投资者,也适用于发行人在证券市场上交换股票。研究得出结论,CAPM不适用于CSE的10个不同行业指数,因为在典型的风险水平下,预期收益与实际收益之间的差距相当大。因此,在五年期间的每一年分别对CAPM进行测试,上述表格的结果不支持CAPM的适用性。