The Conversational Organisation of Drawing

Patrick G. T. Healey, Charlotte R. Peters
{"title":"The Conversational Organisation of Drawing","authors":"Patrick G. T. Healey, Charlotte R. Peters","doi":"10.1109/PLT.2007.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a detailed empirical study of drawing activities in a face-to-face design discussion between three architects. We show that, in addition to their usefulness for representing spatial relationships, drawing activities also display important interactional functions. A short 12 minute interaction is described in which a rich variety of shared drawing spaces are created. We make three claims: i) unlike gesture or speech, drawing activities do not automatically claim rights to the floor', ii) drawing sub-spaces are used to help people monitor if they are talking about the same thing iii) people collaborate to create 3D 'virtual' maquettes through temporary combinations of sketch spaces and gestures. We argue that drawing is defined more by its interactional than its inscriptional character.","PeriodicalId":408508,"journal":{"name":"First International Workshop on Pen-Based Learning Technologies (PLT 2007)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First International Workshop on Pen-Based Learning Technologies (PLT 2007)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PLT.2007.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This paper presents a detailed empirical study of drawing activities in a face-to-face design discussion between three architects. We show that, in addition to their usefulness for representing spatial relationships, drawing activities also display important interactional functions. A short 12 minute interaction is described in which a rich variety of shared drawing spaces are created. We make three claims: i) unlike gesture or speech, drawing activities do not automatically claim rights to the floor', ii) drawing sub-spaces are used to help people monitor if they are talking about the same thing iii) people collaborate to create 3D 'virtual' maquettes through temporary combinations of sketch spaces and gestures. We argue that drawing is defined more by its interactional than its inscriptional character.
绘画的对话组织
本文对三位建筑师面对面设计讨论中的绘图活动进行了详细的实证研究。我们表明,除了它们对表示空间关系的有用性外,绘画活动还显示出重要的交互功能。在12分钟的互动中,创造了丰富多样的共享绘画空间。我们提出三个主张:i)与手势或语言不同,绘图活动不会自动要求对地板的权利,ii)绘图子空间用于帮助人们监控他们是否在谈论同一件事iii)人们通过草图空间和手势的临时组合协作创建3D“虚拟”模型。我们认为,绘画更多的是由其交互性而不是其铭文性来定义的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信