Comparative between Buccal and Vestibular Approaches for Bichectomies

Alan Ncj, Adan Al, Monica Gr, Hector Om, Rogelio Dr, Brenda Vm, Mauricio Dc, Gerardo Mhs, Augusto Ttc, Luciano Rlr, Raymundo Tp, Antonio Uvj
{"title":"Comparative between Buccal and Vestibular Approaches for Bichectomies","authors":"Alan Ncj, Adan Al, Monica Gr, Hector Om, Rogelio Dr, Brenda Vm, Mauricio Dc, Gerardo Mhs, Augusto Ttc, Luciano Rlr, Raymundo Tp, Antonio Uvj","doi":"10.16966/2470-0991.266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Bichectomy is the name given to the surgical procedure that has the objective of removes the adipose body fat of the cheek, eliminating the portion corresponding to the “Bichat” fat pad, which includes around 30 to 40% of this structure. This procedure delivers as a result the reduction of the volume in the middle third of the face. And we use this technique as a good option to analyze and compare. Objectives: To analyze and compare which is the best and easiest approach for buccal fat removal between Buccal and Vestibular. Material and methods: A prospective study was carried out in the Service of Plastic Surgery of the General Hospital of Mexico, during a period of 1 year of evaluation. In an universe of 57 patients, comparing the easiest surgical approach during the plastic surgery formation, all the surgeons where residents between second to fourth year, the evaluation time, oedema, bleeding, post-surgical pain, and the comparison among buccal an vestibular approach. Results: 57 patients were analyzed, independent variables where buccal and vestibular approaches. The most common complication was oedema in 56%, bleeding in 3.5%, with Vestibular approach in 64.9%, and buccal 35.98%, the minor time were 10 minutes, and the mayor time were 35 minutes, so the best approach was vestibular by less soreness, pain, and bleeding, during the plastic surgery residency. Discussion: The bichectomy has an important historical antecedent since in the beginning it was a surgery even without importance in the medical field. The removal of Bichat fat currently has more aesthetic than reconstructive purposes. Conclusions: The best approach to have less complications during the plastic surgery formation is the vestibular, even it was a second or a fourth year plastic surgery resident, and one of the concepts if when you use the same approach your skill fullness improve.","PeriodicalId":115205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgery: Open Access","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgery: Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16966/2470-0991.266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bichectomy is the name given to the surgical procedure that has the objective of removes the adipose body fat of the cheek, eliminating the portion corresponding to the “Bichat” fat pad, which includes around 30 to 40% of this structure. This procedure delivers as a result the reduction of the volume in the middle third of the face. And we use this technique as a good option to analyze and compare. Objectives: To analyze and compare which is the best and easiest approach for buccal fat removal between Buccal and Vestibular. Material and methods: A prospective study was carried out in the Service of Plastic Surgery of the General Hospital of Mexico, during a period of 1 year of evaluation. In an universe of 57 patients, comparing the easiest surgical approach during the plastic surgery formation, all the surgeons where residents between second to fourth year, the evaluation time, oedema, bleeding, post-surgical pain, and the comparison among buccal an vestibular approach. Results: 57 patients were analyzed, independent variables where buccal and vestibular approaches. The most common complication was oedema in 56%, bleeding in 3.5%, with Vestibular approach in 64.9%, and buccal 35.98%, the minor time were 10 minutes, and the mayor time were 35 minutes, so the best approach was vestibular by less soreness, pain, and bleeding, during the plastic surgery residency. Discussion: The bichectomy has an important historical antecedent since in the beginning it was a surgery even without importance in the medical field. The removal of Bichat fat currently has more aesthetic than reconstructive purposes. Conclusions: The best approach to have less complications during the plastic surgery formation is the vestibular, even it was a second or a fourth year plastic surgery resident, and one of the concepts if when you use the same approach your skill fullness improve.
颊部入路与前庭入路在双肺切除术中的比较
简介:双颊切除术是一种外科手术,目的是去除脸颊上的脂肪,去除与“Bichat”脂肪垫相对应的部分,其中约占该结构的30%至40%。这个手术的结果是减少了面部中间三分之一的体积。我们使用这种技术作为分析和比较的一个很好的选择。目的:分析比较颊部与前庭部两种手术入路中哪一种是最佳、最简便的除脂入路。材料和方法:在墨西哥总医院整形外科进行了一项前瞻性研究,为期1年的评估。在一组57例患者中,比较了整形手术形成过程中最简单的手术入路,所有手术入路在住院医师2 ~ 4年之间,评估时间、水肿、出血、术后疼痛以及颊部入路与前庭入路的比较。结果:对57例患者进行分析,独立变量为颊部入路和前庭入路。最常见的并发症是水肿(56%)、出血(3.5%)、前庭入路(64.9%)和颊部入路(35.98%),次要时间为10分钟,主要时间为35分钟,因此在整形外科住院期间,前庭入路的疼痛、疼痛和出血较少,是最佳入路。讨论:双侧切除术有一个重要的历史先例,因为一开始它是一种外科手术,即使在医学领域没有重要性。目前去除Bichat脂肪更多的是为了美观,而不是为了重建。结论:在整形手术形成过程中减少并发症的最佳方法是前庭,即使是第二年或第四年的整形住院医师,其中一个概念是当你使用同样的方法时,你的技能充实度会提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信