Differences of Students’ Learning Outcomes Using Oral and Written Test on Biology Subject at Senior High School

{"title":"Differences of Students’ Learning Outcomes Using Oral and Written Test on Biology Subject at Senior High School","authors":"","doi":"10.22487/j25490192.2021.v5.i2.pp48-55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to determine the learning outcomes of students who used oral tests in biology subjects. Learning outcomes using oral tests and written tests. The research population is students of class X MIA and XI MIA. The results of the calculation of the statistical analysis of the oral and written tests showed that in the oral test, there were 48 students in the poor category, 7 students in the sufficient category, while in the very good category, there were 0 students. In the written test, there were 33 students who received the less category, 14 students in the sufficient category, 5 students in the good category and 3 students in the very good category. The results of the Wilcoxon test calculations show that the output of the Test Statistics Asymp.Sig (2-tailed) is 0.000. Because the value of 0.000 is smaller than 0.05, it can be concluded \"Ho is rejected\". This means that there is a difference in student learning outcomes between those given oral tests and those given written tests in biology subjects, with the average written test being higher than the average oral test, both in class X MIA and class XI MIA.","PeriodicalId":373677,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Riset Pendidikan MIPA","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Riset Pendidikan MIPA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22487/j25490192.2021.v5.i2.pp48-55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the learning outcomes of students who used oral tests in biology subjects. Learning outcomes using oral tests and written tests. The research population is students of class X MIA and XI MIA. The results of the calculation of the statistical analysis of the oral and written tests showed that in the oral test, there were 48 students in the poor category, 7 students in the sufficient category, while in the very good category, there were 0 students. In the written test, there were 33 students who received the less category, 14 students in the sufficient category, 5 students in the good category and 3 students in the very good category. The results of the Wilcoxon test calculations show that the output of the Test Statistics Asymp.Sig (2-tailed) is 0.000. Because the value of 0.000 is smaller than 0.05, it can be concluded "Ho is rejected". This means that there is a difference in student learning outcomes between those given oral tests and those given written tests in biology subjects, with the average written test being higher than the average oral test, both in class X MIA and class XI MIA.
高中生物科目口试与笔试对学生学习成果的影响
本研究的目的是确定在生物学科目中使用口语测试的学生的学习成果。使用口语和笔试的学习成果。对口试和笔试进行统计分析计算的结果显示,在口试中,差类学生有48人,够用类学生7人,极好类学生0人。在笔试中,有33名学生获得了较差的类别,14名学生获得了足够的类别,5名学生获得了良好的类别,3名学生获得了非常好的类别。Wilcoxon检验计算的结果表明,检验统计渐近sig(双尾)的输出为0.000。因为0.000的值小于0.05,所以可以得出“Ho被拒绝”的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信