Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalysis as the basis of anthropology

R. Tratch
{"title":"Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalysis as the basis of anthropology","authors":"R. Tratch","doi":"10.35774/pis2021.01.150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The existence of four directions of psychoanalysis realization in modern psychology is argued in the historical-psychological research, that is as an original method of treatment of neuroses and other mental disorders exclusively in a verbal way; as a theory of personality, that is, as a system of scientific knowledge about the formation of human character; as a systemic, often shocking, critique of Western civilization and as a new philosophy and thus a kind of worldview that sheds the light of truth on the unconscious sphere of its life. The historical way of formation of Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalysis as a separate, biologically determined, naturally centered and culturally influential current of psychological science of the XX century is highlighted and the motivating influence of concepts and themes of B. Pascal, F. Nietzsche and especially J. Charcot is indicated on this formation, firstly as an idea and research program, then as a theory and method of psychotherapeutic practice. The exceptional importance of Freud’s creative collaboration with his older colleague Joseph Brier is emphasized, the productivity of which is confirmed by the jointly published book “The Study of Hysteria” published in 1895. It is it which initiates the expansive psychoanalytic discourse. It is noted that the idea and concept of displacement became the central core of Freudian psychology and made it possible to understand both individual works of fiction and classical works of art. It is stated that translations of selected Freud’s works into the native language were received by Ukrainian scientists only at the end of the last century, which, however, does not diminish the importance of psychoanalysis as a theoretical-empirical foundation of anthropology. Finally, based on the rich legacy of Philip Lersch, a conclusion is formulated about the prospects of a phenomenological approach to the cognition of human mental life in the context of urgent tasks of both theoretical psychology and applied, practice-oriented.","PeriodicalId":380512,"journal":{"name":"Psihologìâ ì suspìlʹstvo","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psihologìâ ì suspìlʹstvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2021.01.150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The existence of four directions of psychoanalysis realization in modern psychology is argued in the historical-psychological research, that is as an original method of treatment of neuroses and other mental disorders exclusively in a verbal way; as a theory of personality, that is, as a system of scientific knowledge about the formation of human character; as a systemic, often shocking, critique of Western civilization and as a new philosophy and thus a kind of worldview that sheds the light of truth on the unconscious sphere of its life. The historical way of formation of Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalysis as a separate, biologically determined, naturally centered and culturally influential current of psychological science of the XX century is highlighted and the motivating influence of concepts and themes of B. Pascal, F. Nietzsche and especially J. Charcot is indicated on this formation, firstly as an idea and research program, then as a theory and method of psychotherapeutic practice. The exceptional importance of Freud’s creative collaboration with his older colleague Joseph Brier is emphasized, the productivity of which is confirmed by the jointly published book “The Study of Hysteria” published in 1895. It is it which initiates the expansive psychoanalytic discourse. It is noted that the idea and concept of displacement became the central core of Freudian psychology and made it possible to understand both individual works of fiction and classical works of art. It is stated that translations of selected Freud’s works into the native language were received by Ukrainian scientists only at the end of the last century, which, however, does not diminish the importance of psychoanalysis as a theoretical-empirical foundation of anthropology. Finally, based on the rich legacy of Philip Lersch, a conclusion is formulated about the prospects of a phenomenological approach to the cognition of human mental life in the context of urgent tasks of both theoretical psychology and applied, practice-oriented.
西格蒙德·弗洛伊德的精神分析作为人类学的基础
在历史心理学研究中,论述了精神分析在现代心理学中实现的四个方向,即作为一种治疗神经症和其他精神障碍的原始方法,完全以语言的方式;作为一种人格理论,即作为一种关于人格形成的科学知识体系;作为一种对西方文明的系统的、常常令人震惊的批判,作为一种新的哲学,从而作为一种世界观,将真理之光投射到其生活的无意识领域。西格蒙德·弗洛伊德的精神分析作为20世纪心理科学中一个独立的、由生物学决定的、以自然为中心的、具有文化影响力的流派,其形成的历史途径被强调,b·帕斯卡、f·尼采,尤其是j·夏科特的概念和主题对这一形成的激励影响被指出,首先是作为一种思想和研究计划,然后是作为一种心理治疗实践的理论和方法。书中强调了弗洛伊德与他的老同事约瑟夫·布里尔(Joseph Brier)的创造性合作的特殊重要性,1895年出版的《歇斯底里研究》(The Study of Hysteria)证实了这一合作的生产力。正是它开启了广泛的精神分析话语。值得注意的是,位移的思想和概念成为弗洛伊德心理学的核心,并使理解小说和古典艺术作品的个体作品成为可能。有人说,选定的弗洛伊德作品翻译成母语的乌克兰科学家只是在上世纪末才收到,然而,这并没有削弱精神分析作为人类学理论经验基础的重要性。最后,基于菲利普·勒施的丰富遗产,在理论心理学和应用实践导向的紧迫任务背景下,对人类精神生活认知的现象学方法的前景进行了总结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信