From incentive to self-organization: The evolution of management approaches

N. Orlova
{"title":"From incentive to self-organization: The evolution of management approaches","authors":"N. Orlova","doi":"10.21638/spbu12.2020.203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is an overview of approaches to managing labor motivation Evolution from classical Taylorism to modern agile methods. The author considers the main approaches to work motivation in the context of their relationship with the basic principles of the agile. In the 20 th century management evolved from simple forms to complex hierarchical organization, depersonaliza-tion and bureaucratization of business processes until it became a hindrance to development and competitiveness. After that the reverse movement begins — towards a flatter management structure and proclamation of the priority of “people and relationships” in relation to “processes and tools”, to “motivation without stimulation”. The logic regarding employee motivation has undergone changes: from the idea that motivation can and should be controlled with external incentives to the belief that any attempt to exert external influence can demotivate employees. The author has developed a typology of approaches to work motivation based on the severity of two components in the theory: “system — actor”; and “stimulation — self-organization”. The system-actor dichotomy shows how the theory explains labor motivation: focusing attention on the control system or on the individual characteristics of the actor, needs or work values. The dichotomy “stimulation — self-organization” explains how it is supposed to influence the motivation of an individual or group: through targeted stimulation or the creation of conditions for self-organization. These dichotomies were chosen to highlight the typology in connection with their importance for the agile approach. The article focuses on three aspects of motivation: material incentives, social environment, labor content. These aspects are of the greatest importance for agile management, and a focus on them allows you to see the fundamental differences between agile practices and traditional management approaches.","PeriodicalId":135763,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2020.203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is an overview of approaches to managing labor motivation Evolution from classical Taylorism to modern agile methods. The author considers the main approaches to work motivation in the context of their relationship with the basic principles of the agile. In the 20 th century management evolved from simple forms to complex hierarchical organization, depersonaliza-tion and bureaucratization of business processes until it became a hindrance to development and competitiveness. After that the reverse movement begins — towards a flatter management structure and proclamation of the priority of “people and relationships” in relation to “processes and tools”, to “motivation without stimulation”. The logic regarding employee motivation has undergone changes: from the idea that motivation can and should be controlled with external incentives to the belief that any attempt to exert external influence can demotivate employees. The author has developed a typology of approaches to work motivation based on the severity of two components in the theory: “system — actor”; and “stimulation — self-organization”. The system-actor dichotomy shows how the theory explains labor motivation: focusing attention on the control system or on the individual characteristics of the actor, needs or work values. The dichotomy “stimulation — self-organization” explains how it is supposed to influence the motivation of an individual or group: through targeted stimulation or the creation of conditions for self-organization. These dichotomies were chosen to highlight the typology in connection with their importance for the agile approach. The article focuses on three aspects of motivation: material incentives, social environment, labor content. These aspects are of the greatest importance for agile management, and a focus on them allows you to see the fundamental differences between agile practices and traditional management approaches.
从激励到自组织:管理方法的演变
本文概述了从经典泰勒制到现代敏捷方法的演进过程。作者在与敏捷基本原则的关系的背景下考虑了工作动机的主要方法。在20世纪,管理从简单的形式演变为复杂的等级组织,业务流程的非个性化和官僚化,直到它成为发展和竞争力的障碍。在那之后,相反的运动开始了——朝着更扁平的管理结构,宣布“人和关系”相对于“流程和工具”的优先级,到“没有刺激的动机”。关于员工激励的逻辑已经发生了变化:从认为激励可以而且应该由外部激励来控制,到认为任何施加外部影响的企图都会使员工失去动力。作者根据理论中两个组成部分的严重程度,开发了一种工作动机方法的类型学:“系统-行动者”;以及“刺激-自组织”。系统-行为者二分法显示了该理论如何解释劳动动机:将注意力集中在控制系统或行为者的个人特征、需求或工作价值上。“刺激-自组织”的二分法解释了它应该如何影响个人或群体的动机:通过有针对性的刺激或为自组织创造条件。选择这些二分法是为了突出类型及其对敏捷方法的重要性。本文主要从物质激励、社会环境激励、劳动内容激励三个方面进行论述。这些方面对于敏捷管理来说是最重要的,关注它们可以让您看到敏捷实践与传统管理方法之间的根本区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信