Implementation of quality management systems as proposal towards academic quality. Case study: Universidad Católica de Cuenca

S. Moscoso, L. S. Pauta, P. C. Álvarez, E. Pozo
{"title":"Implementation of quality management systems as proposal towards academic quality. Case study: Universidad Católica de Cuenca","authors":"S. Moscoso, L. S. Pauta, P. C. Álvarez, E. Pozo","doi":"10.1109/ICACIT.2017.8358081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the perspective of the University as a co-financed higher education institution, the need to implement instruments and systems to improve the management and quality of the academic area was analyzed and determined. Among the different tools offered, from the perspective of the systematic search for efficiency and effectiveness in academic management, we opted to implement a Quality Management System (QMS) based on processes and procedures, where monitoring of indicators was carried out through a Balanced Scorecard, because it addresses most of the perspectives from which the management can be approached that affect the functioning of the University, as well as of its different dependencies derived from the academic area. In this context, the present research provides a proposal for the implementation of a Quality Management System based on processes and monitoring for proper decision making, and its impact on the accreditation process based on the accreditation models of the country, obtaining satisfactory results.","PeriodicalId":386926,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Symposium on Engineering Accreditation (ICACIT)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Symposium on Engineering Accreditation (ICACIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACIT.2017.8358081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From the perspective of the University as a co-financed higher education institution, the need to implement instruments and systems to improve the management and quality of the academic area was analyzed and determined. Among the different tools offered, from the perspective of the systematic search for efficiency and effectiveness in academic management, we opted to implement a Quality Management System (QMS) based on processes and procedures, where monitoring of indicators was carried out through a Balanced Scorecard, because it addresses most of the perspectives from which the management can be approached that affect the functioning of the University, as well as of its different dependencies derived from the academic area. In this context, the present research provides a proposal for the implementation of a Quality Management System based on processes and monitoring for proper decision making, and its impact on the accreditation process based on the accreditation models of the country, obtaining satisfactory results.
实施质量管理体系,提高学术质量。案例研究:昆卡大学Católica
从大学作为一所共同资助的高等教育机构的角度出发,分析和确定了实施工具和系统以改善学术领域的管理和质量的必要性。在提供的不同工具中,从系统地寻求学术管理的效率和有效性的角度来看,我们选择实施基于流程和程序的质量管理体系(QMS),其中通过平衡计分卡对指标进行监控,因为它解决了影响大学运作的管理的大多数角度。以及来自学术领域的不同依赖关系。在此背景下,本研究提出了一个基于过程和监测的质量管理体系的实施建议,以正确的决策,以及它对基于国家认可模式的认可过程的影响,获得了令人满意的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信