Human-in-the-Loop Evaluation of Dynamic Multi-Flight Common Route Advisories

K. Bilimoria, M. Hayashi, K. Sheth
{"title":"Human-in-the-Loop Evaluation of Dynamic Multi-Flight Common Route Advisories","authors":"K. Bilimoria, M. Hayashi, K. Sheth","doi":"10.2514/6.2018-2877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flights often experience large delays when they are routed around weather. Multi-flight common route advisories provide delay recovery by suggesting time-saving re-routes for groups of flights whose current weather-avoidance routes have become outdated because the weather has dissipated and/or moved away. A laboratory evaluation of these advisories was conducted by four subject matter experts having extensive experience in traffic flow management operations. These experts provided a total of 120 data points in the airspace of Houston Center. The multi-flight common route tool provides time-saving route change advisories taking into account flight plans, wind fields, and the spatio-temporal evolution of predicted convective weather. It is not designed to account for complex operational factors such as non-standard sector traversal and interactions with local traffic management initiatives; hence a relatively low percentage (37%) of advisories generated by the tool were rated as acceptable. However, a high percentage (81%) of advisories were rated as acceptable after the subject matter experts used the tool’s user interface to make route modifications that accounted for relevant operational factors not considered by the tool. The workload associated with using the tool, as measured by the NASA Task Load Index, was quite low (1.1 on a scale of 0 to 10). The results of this evaluation make a good case for human-automation teaming to design operationally valid weather re-routes for delay recovery.","PeriodicalId":229151,"journal":{"name":"2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference","volume":"362 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-2877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Flights often experience large delays when they are routed around weather. Multi-flight common route advisories provide delay recovery by suggesting time-saving re-routes for groups of flights whose current weather-avoidance routes have become outdated because the weather has dissipated and/or moved away. A laboratory evaluation of these advisories was conducted by four subject matter experts having extensive experience in traffic flow management operations. These experts provided a total of 120 data points in the airspace of Houston Center. The multi-flight common route tool provides time-saving route change advisories taking into account flight plans, wind fields, and the spatio-temporal evolution of predicted convective weather. It is not designed to account for complex operational factors such as non-standard sector traversal and interactions with local traffic management initiatives; hence a relatively low percentage (37%) of advisories generated by the tool were rated as acceptable. However, a high percentage (81%) of advisories were rated as acceptable after the subject matter experts used the tool’s user interface to make route modifications that accounted for relevant operational factors not considered by the tool. The workload associated with using the tool, as measured by the NASA Task Load Index, was quite low (1.1 on a scale of 0 to 10). The results of this evaluation make a good case for human-automation teaming to design operationally valid weather re-routes for delay recovery.
动态多航班公共航线通知的人在环评估
由于天气原因,航班经常会严重延误。多航班共同航线咨询通过为当前因天气消散和/或移动而已过时的航班群组建议节省时间的改道,从而提供延误恢复。四名在交通流量管理业务方面具有丰富经验的主题专家对这些咨询进行了实验室评价。这些专家在休斯顿中心的空域共提供了120个数据点。考虑到飞行计划、风场和预测对流天气的时空演变,多航班通用航路工具提供省时的航路更改建议。它的设计不考虑复杂的操作因素,如非标准的部门穿越和与当地交通管理措施的相互作用;因此,由该工具生成的建议被评为可接受的百分比相对较低(37%)。然而,在主题专家使用工具的用户界面进行路线修改后,高百分比(81%)的建议被评为可接受的,这些修改考虑了工具未考虑的相关操作因素。根据NASA任务负载指数,与使用该工具相关的工作量相当低(在0到10的范围内为1.1)。该评估结果为人为自动化团队设计有效的天气改道以恢复延误提供了一个很好的案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信