Frontier Arctic Offshore Exploration Drilling Business Challenge

M. M. Winkler
{"title":"Frontier Arctic Offshore Exploration Drilling Business Challenge","authors":"M. M. Winkler","doi":"10.4043/29144-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The ‘Frontier Arctic’ offshore has been explored on and off since the 1970s, driven by oil price and areas open for leasing or licensing. While a widespread, future return is questionable, operators contemplating a return can benefit from past experience. Insight and perspective are provided on the technical and non-technical challenges and impact on the business challenge. Actions and opportunities to change the overall cost and non-technical business risk dynamic are discussed.\n ‘Frontier Arctic’ oil and gas resources have characteristics of 1) being located outboard of established offshore regions of oil and gas exploration and development, 2) having physical attributes of water depth and ice conditions that require the use of specialized equipment or measures to safely and cost effectively drill, and 3) having non-technical business risks with the potential for high business consequences. This loose definition includes much of the Alaskan Arctic, the Canadian Beaufort Sea, Greenland, the far northern Barents Sea, and much of the Russian shelf. The technical and non-technical issues associated with exploration drilling in these regions are well-established, but not necessarily well-integrated.\n ‘Frontier Arctic’ exploration drilling can be safely, responsibly, and reliably executed. The principal challenges are cost to address both routine operations and emergency response preparedness and and non-technical business risk. The required solutions to address these challenges and business risks lead to a layering of complexity and cost that increase exploration drilling costs multifold over competing oil and gas investment opportunities and require significant and sustained commitments of financial, organizational and people resources to achieve business success. Furthermore, ‘Frontier Arctic’ opportunities cannot be turned on at will and require significant planning and preparation and associated lead time.\n Interest in ‘Frontier Arctic’ exploration may be rekindled in the future depending upon commodity prices; however, the ability to make material cost changes are limited due to the nature of the technical challenge; and the \"Frontier Arctic’ will likely remain a target for environmental activism. Furthermore, exploration drilling would need to take place now or in the reasonably near future if ‘Frontier Arctic’ resources are to have a chance of contributing to a future oil or gas supply shortfall. Notwithstanding, Arctic offshore exploration can be expected to continue in regions where cost and business risk can be managed such as the southern Barents Sea and nearshore Alaska Beaufort Sea region.","PeriodicalId":286074,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, November 06, 2018","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, November 06, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29144-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ‘Frontier Arctic’ offshore has been explored on and off since the 1970s, driven by oil price and areas open for leasing or licensing. While a widespread, future return is questionable, operators contemplating a return can benefit from past experience. Insight and perspective are provided on the technical and non-technical challenges and impact on the business challenge. Actions and opportunities to change the overall cost and non-technical business risk dynamic are discussed. ‘Frontier Arctic’ oil and gas resources have characteristics of 1) being located outboard of established offshore regions of oil and gas exploration and development, 2) having physical attributes of water depth and ice conditions that require the use of specialized equipment or measures to safely and cost effectively drill, and 3) having non-technical business risks with the potential for high business consequences. This loose definition includes much of the Alaskan Arctic, the Canadian Beaufort Sea, Greenland, the far northern Barents Sea, and much of the Russian shelf. The technical and non-technical issues associated with exploration drilling in these regions are well-established, but not necessarily well-integrated. ‘Frontier Arctic’ exploration drilling can be safely, responsibly, and reliably executed. The principal challenges are cost to address both routine operations and emergency response preparedness and and non-technical business risk. The required solutions to address these challenges and business risks lead to a layering of complexity and cost that increase exploration drilling costs multifold over competing oil and gas investment opportunities and require significant and sustained commitments of financial, organizational and people resources to achieve business success. Furthermore, ‘Frontier Arctic’ opportunities cannot be turned on at will and require significant planning and preparation and associated lead time. Interest in ‘Frontier Arctic’ exploration may be rekindled in the future depending upon commodity prices; however, the ability to make material cost changes are limited due to the nature of the technical challenge; and the "Frontier Arctic’ will likely remain a target for environmental activism. Furthermore, exploration drilling would need to take place now or in the reasonably near future if ‘Frontier Arctic’ resources are to have a chance of contributing to a future oil or gas supply shortfall. Notwithstanding, Arctic offshore exploration can be expected to continue in regions where cost and business risk can be managed such as the southern Barents Sea and nearshore Alaska Beaufort Sea region.
前沿北极海上勘探钻井业务挑战
自20世纪70年代以来,受油价和开放租赁或许可的地区的推动,“前沿北极”近海的勘探断断续续。尽管未来能否获得广泛的回报值得怀疑,但考虑回报的运营商可以从过去的经验中获益。提供了关于技术和非技术挑战以及对业务挑战的影响的见解和观点。讨论了改变总体成本和非技术业务风险动态的行动和机会。“前沿北极”油气资源具有以下特点:1)位于已建立的海上油气勘探和开发区域之外;2)具有水深和冰况的物理属性,需要使用专门的设备或措施来安全、经济地钻探;3)具有非技术商业风险,具有潜在的高商业后果。这个宽泛的定义包括阿拉斯加北极的大部分地区、加拿大波弗特海、格陵兰岛、巴伦支海最北部以及俄罗斯大陆架的大部分地区。与这些地区的勘探钻探有关的技术和非技术问题已经确立,但不一定很好地结合在一起。“前沿北极”勘探钻井可以安全、负责、可靠地执行。主要挑战是处理日常业务和应急准备的费用以及非技术业务风险。为了应对这些挑战和商业风险,所需的解决方案带来了层层的复杂性和成本,与竞争激烈的油气投资机会相比,勘探钻井成本增加了数倍,并且需要大量和持续的财务、组织和人力资源的投入来实现商业成功。此外,“前沿北极”的机会不能随意打开,需要大量的计划、准备和相关的交货时间。未来,人们对“北极前沿”勘探的兴趣可能会重新燃起,这取决于大宗商品的价格;然而,由于技术挑战的性质,改变材料成本的能力是有限的;而“前沿北极”可能仍将是环保活动的目标。此外,如果“北极前沿”资源有可能导致未来的石油或天然气供应短缺,那么勘探钻探将需要在现在或不久的将来进行。尽管如此,在成本和商业风险可控的地区,如巴伦支海南部和阿拉斯加波弗特海近岸地区,北极近海勘探预计将继续进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信