Ironies of proximity: Intergroup threat and contact avoidance on neighbourhood interface areas

John Dixon, C. Tredoux, K. Durrheim, Philippa Kerr, Brice Gijbertsen
{"title":"Ironies of proximity: Intergroup threat and contact avoidance on neighbourhood interface areas","authors":"John Dixon, C. Tredoux, K. Durrheim, Philippa Kerr, Brice Gijbertsen","doi":"10.1002/casp.2732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on the dynamics of neighbourhood desegregation and diversity has identified a paradox. On the one hand, such processes may engender positive intergroup contact experiences, improving intergroup attitudes and relations. On the other hand, they may have the opposite effect, exacerbating negative intergroup relations and generating new forms of avoidance and exclusion. The present research explored one aspect of this paradox. Building on a field survey conducted with Indian residents (n = 364) of a suburb of Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, we demonstrate how their relative proximity to areas occupied by ‘incoming’ Black African residents has shaped their perceptions of intergroup threat and associated reactions such as contact avoidance, boundary fortification and support for policies resisting desegregation. At the same time, we demonstrate how such effects are moderated by residents' wider experiences of positive interracial contact. In conclusion, we emphasize the need to better integrate psychological work on the contact hypothesis with work in companion disciplines such as urban studies and human geography. Please refer to the Supplementary Material section to find this article's Community and Social Impact Statement.","PeriodicalId":321305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on the dynamics of neighbourhood desegregation and diversity has identified a paradox. On the one hand, such processes may engender positive intergroup contact experiences, improving intergroup attitudes and relations. On the other hand, they may have the opposite effect, exacerbating negative intergroup relations and generating new forms of avoidance and exclusion. The present research explored one aspect of this paradox. Building on a field survey conducted with Indian residents (n = 364) of a suburb of Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, we demonstrate how their relative proximity to areas occupied by ‘incoming’ Black African residents has shaped their perceptions of intergroup threat and associated reactions such as contact avoidance, boundary fortification and support for policies resisting desegregation. At the same time, we demonstrate how such effects are moderated by residents' wider experiences of positive interracial contact. In conclusion, we emphasize the need to better integrate psychological work on the contact hypothesis with work in companion disciplines such as urban studies and human geography. Please refer to the Supplementary Material section to find this article's Community and Social Impact Statement.
邻近的反讽:邻近界面区域的族群间威胁与接触回避
对社区种族隔离和多样性的动态研究发现了一个悖论。一方面,这些过程可以产生积极的群体间接触体验,改善群体间的态度和关系。另一方面,它们可能产生相反的效果,加剧消极的群体间关系,产生新的回避和排斥形式。本研究探讨了这一悖论的一个方面。在对南非彼得马里茨堡郊区的印度居民(n = 364)进行实地调查的基础上,我们展示了他们与“入境”非洲黑人居民占据的地区的相对接近程度如何影响了他们对群体间威胁的看法和相关反应,如避免接触、边界防御和支持反对废除种族隔离的政策。同时,我们证明了这种影响是如何被居民更广泛的积极种族间接触的经历所缓和的。总之,我们强调有必要更好地将接触假设的心理学工作与城市研究和人文地理学等相关学科的工作结合起来。请参阅补充材料部分,以找到本文的社区和社会影响声明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信