Human Centered Explainability for Intelligent Vehicles – A User Study

Julia Graefe, Selma Paden, Doreen Engelhardt, K. Bengler
{"title":"Human Centered Explainability for Intelligent Vehicles – A User Study","authors":"Julia Graefe, Selma Paden, Doreen Engelhardt, K. Bengler","doi":"10.1145/3543174.3546846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) are leading to an increased use of algorithm-generated user-adaptivity in everyday products. Explainable AI aims to make algorithmic decision-making more transparent to humans. As future vehicles become more intelligent and user-adaptive, explainability will play an important role ensuring that drivers understand the AI system's functionalities and outputs. However, when integrating explainability into in-vehicle features there is a lack of knowledge about user needs and requirements and how to address them. We conducted a study with 59 participants focusing on how end-users evaluate explainability in the context of user-adaptive comfort and infotainment features. Results show that explanations foster perceived understandability and transparency of the system, but that the need for explanation may vary between features. Additionally, we found that insufficiently designed explanations can decrease acceptance of the system. Our findings underline the requirement for a user-centered approach in explainable AI and indicate approaches for future research.","PeriodicalId":284749,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3543174.3546846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) are leading to an increased use of algorithm-generated user-adaptivity in everyday products. Explainable AI aims to make algorithmic decision-making more transparent to humans. As future vehicles become more intelligent and user-adaptive, explainability will play an important role ensuring that drivers understand the AI system's functionalities and outputs. However, when integrating explainability into in-vehicle features there is a lack of knowledge about user needs and requirements and how to address them. We conducted a study with 59 participants focusing on how end-users evaluate explainability in the context of user-adaptive comfort and infotainment features. Results show that explanations foster perceived understandability and transparency of the system, but that the need for explanation may vary between features. Additionally, we found that insufficiently designed explanations can decrease acceptance of the system. Our findings underline the requirement for a user-centered approach in explainable AI and indicate approaches for future research.
智能车辆以人为中心的可解释性——一项用户研究
人工智能(AI)的进步导致在日常产品中越来越多地使用算法生成的用户适应性。可解释的人工智能旨在使算法决策对人类更加透明。随着未来车辆变得更加智能和自适应,可解释性将在确保驾驶员理解人工智能系统的功能和输出方面发挥重要作用。然而,当将可解释性集成到车载功能中时,缺乏对用户需求和需求以及如何解决这些需求的了解。我们对59名参与者进行了一项研究,重点关注最终用户如何在用户自适应舒适和信息娱乐功能的背景下评估可解释性。结果表明,解释促进了系统的可理解性和透明度,但对解释的需求可能因特征而异。此外,我们发现设计不充分的解释会降低系统的接受度。我们的研究结果强调了在可解释的人工智能中需要以用户为中心的方法,并指出了未来研究的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信