An innovative shock-absorbing blue silicone shell to reduce breakage of veterinary pharmaceutical glass vials

Sylvain DARCQ, Arnaud STEINER, Denis JARRIN, Jessica NEWBERRY, Luc DUREL
{"title":"An innovative shock-absorbing blue silicone shell to reduce breakage of veterinary pharmaceutical glass vials","authors":"Sylvain DARCQ, Arnaud STEINER, Denis JARRIN, Jessica NEWBERRY, Luc DUREL","doi":"10.53771/ijstra.2023.4.1.0166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although glass is an excellent material for manufacturing containers for pharmaceutical use, it remains fragile. This study aimed to support the qualities of glass by protecting the bottles with a shell made of polysiloxane elastomer, and to compare the relative resistance to breakage of this combination with that of a specifically designed plastic bottle.320 vials (250 and 500 ml) made of both glass and plastic, containing injectable veterinary drugs, were subjected to serial drop tests. A first group of containers (SCG: Silicone-Coated Glass) made of Type-1 glass were protected at the shoulder and bottom by a blue silicone soft shell, while those in the second group (LAS: Layered Anti-Shatter) were made of layered shatter-resistant plastic available on the market. Drop tests were carried out at three different angles (0°, 45°, 90°) from the vertical axis of the drop, from two drop heights (80 and 120 cm). All drop conditions (angle, height) and packaging (250 and 500 ml) combined, the risk of breakage of SCG vs LAS vials was RR=0.250 (shattered/intact ratio: 6/154 vs 24/136, 95% CI [0.105;0.595], P=0.002). Up to h=80 cm, no SCG (250 or 500 ml) was broken (0/80), compared to 9/71 for LAS (RR=0.053, 95% CI [0.003; 0.889], P=0.041). The 45° drop on the heel of the bottle produced the most damage for LAS containers (0/80 vs 23/57, RR=0.021; 95% CI [0.001; 0.344], P=0.007). In the event of an accidental fall, the contents of the glass bottle in a silicone shell are significantly better protected than in the multi-layer plastic bottle.","PeriodicalId":122395,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Science and Technology Research Archive","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Science and Technology Research Archive","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53771/ijstra.2023.4.1.0166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although glass is an excellent material for manufacturing containers for pharmaceutical use, it remains fragile. This study aimed to support the qualities of glass by protecting the bottles with a shell made of polysiloxane elastomer, and to compare the relative resistance to breakage of this combination with that of a specifically designed plastic bottle.320 vials (250 and 500 ml) made of both glass and plastic, containing injectable veterinary drugs, were subjected to serial drop tests. A first group of containers (SCG: Silicone-Coated Glass) made of Type-1 glass were protected at the shoulder and bottom by a blue silicone soft shell, while those in the second group (LAS: Layered Anti-Shatter) were made of layered shatter-resistant plastic available on the market. Drop tests were carried out at three different angles (0°, 45°, 90°) from the vertical axis of the drop, from two drop heights (80 and 120 cm). All drop conditions (angle, height) and packaging (250 and 500 ml) combined, the risk of breakage of SCG vs LAS vials was RR=0.250 (shattered/intact ratio: 6/154 vs 24/136, 95% CI [0.105;0.595], P=0.002). Up to h=80 cm, no SCG (250 or 500 ml) was broken (0/80), compared to 9/71 for LAS (RR=0.053, 95% CI [0.003; 0.889], P=0.041). The 45° drop on the heel of the bottle produced the most damage for LAS containers (0/80 vs 23/57, RR=0.021; 95% CI [0.001; 0.344], P=0.007). In the event of an accidental fall, the contents of the glass bottle in a silicone shell are significantly better protected than in the multi-layer plastic bottle.
一个创新的减震蓝色硅胶外壳,以减少破碎的兽药玻璃瓶
虽然玻璃是制造医药容器的优良材料,但它仍然很脆弱。这项研究旨在通过用聚硅氧烷弹性体制成的外壳保护瓶子来支持玻璃的质量,并将这种组合与专门设计的塑料瓶的相对抗破碎性进行比较。320瓶(250和500毫升)由玻璃和塑料制成,装有注射兽药,进行了一系列滴试。第一组容器(SCG:硅涂层玻璃)由1型玻璃制成,在肩部和底部由蓝色硅胶软壳保护,而第二组容器(LAS:分层防破碎)由市场上可买到的分层防破碎塑料制成。从两个落点高度(80和120 cm)出发,从落点垂直轴线的三个不同角度(0°、45°和90°)进行落点试验。所有跌落条件(角度、高度)和包装(250和500 ml)相结合,SCG瓶与LAS瓶的破损风险RR=0.250(破碎/完整比例:6/154 vs 24/136, 95% CI [0.105;0.595], P=0.002)。直到h=80 cm,没有SCG(250或500 ml)破裂(0/80),而LAS为9/71 (RR=0.053, 95% CI [0.003;0.889, P = 0.041)。瓶后跟45°的落差对LAS容器造成的伤害最大(0/80 vs 23/57, RR=0.021;95% ci [0.001;0.344, P = 0.007)。在意外坠落的情况下,硅胶壳中的玻璃瓶比多层塑料瓶中的玻璃瓶受到明显更好的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信