Public Policy and Informal Institutions: A New Moral Economy of Corruption in Rural India

Thibaud Marcesse
{"title":"Public Policy and Informal Institutions: A New Moral Economy of Corruption in Rural India","authors":"Thibaud Marcesse","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2802655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How does the interaction between formal and informal institutions shape policy out- comes? This paper investigates the ways in which informal institutions distort the formal rules created by a large public works program in a poor, mostly rural, North Indian district. Born out of a legislative agenda that emphasized a universal right to work, and implemented in India since 2005, the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (or NREGS) represents a radical democratic experiment. A public works scheme, NREGS delivers benefits through self-selection rather than means-tested targeting – a move that was intended to provide unemployment relief through the promotion of grassroots democracy. Based on 15 months of intensive fieldwork done in Uttar Pradesh, India, this paper shows that the scheme has been implemented in a way that is deeply inimical to NREGS’ emancipatory agenda. I argue that informal institutions have responded – and largely adjusted – to new opportunities and new state rules, building on traditional mechanisms of dealing with state machinery and edicts. The outcome is a moral economy of corruption, a set of norms about the allocation of public resources that has emerged to answer the agency problems created by the new institutional framework, such as the decentralization of welfare benefits.","PeriodicalId":342163,"journal":{"name":"Political Institutions: Bureaucracies & Public Administration eJournal","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Institutions: Bureaucracies & Public Administration eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2802655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

How does the interaction between formal and informal institutions shape policy out- comes? This paper investigates the ways in which informal institutions distort the formal rules created by a large public works program in a poor, mostly rural, North Indian district. Born out of a legislative agenda that emphasized a universal right to work, and implemented in India since 2005, the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (or NREGS) represents a radical democratic experiment. A public works scheme, NREGS delivers benefits through self-selection rather than means-tested targeting – a move that was intended to provide unemployment relief through the promotion of grassroots democracy. Based on 15 months of intensive fieldwork done in Uttar Pradesh, India, this paper shows that the scheme has been implemented in a way that is deeply inimical to NREGS’ emancipatory agenda. I argue that informal institutions have responded – and largely adjusted – to new opportunities and new state rules, building on traditional mechanisms of dealing with state machinery and edicts. The outcome is a moral economy of corruption, a set of norms about the allocation of public resources that has emerged to answer the agency problems created by the new institutional framework, such as the decentralization of welfare benefits.
公共政策与非正式制度:印度农村腐败的新道德经济
正式和非正式制度之间的相互作用是如何塑造政策结果的?本文研究了在一个贫穷的、主要是农村的北印度地区,非正式制度是如何扭曲由大型公共工程项目制定的正式规则的。《全国农村就业保障计划》(National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme,简称NREGS)诞生于强调普遍工作权的立法议程,并自2005年起在印度实施,它代表了一项激进的民主实验。作为一项公共工程计划,NREGS通过自我选择而不是经过经济状况调查的目标发放福利——这一举措旨在通过促进基层民主来提供失业救济。基于在印度北方邦进行的为期15个月的密集实地调查,本文表明,该计划的实施方式对NREGS的解放议程极为不利。我认为,非正式机构在处理国家机器和法令的传统机制的基础上,已经对新的机遇和新的国家规则做出了反应,并在很大程度上进行了调整。其结果是一种腐败的道德经济,一套关于公共资源配置的规范已经出现,以回答新的制度框架所产生的代理问题,例如福利的分散化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信