Ageism: A Threat to “Aging Well” in the 21st Century

J. Angus, P. Reeve
{"title":"Ageism: A Threat to “Aging Well” in the 21st Century","authors":"J. Angus, P. Reeve","doi":"10.1177/0733464805285745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the beginning of the 21st century, the new mantra—“successful” and “resourceful” aging—is used interchangeably and intoned often unreflectively by a society eager to find ways to reduce aged-related losses. Yet despite numerous empirical studies and public health promotion strategies directed at ways of aging well, negative images of aging have an enduring vitality. This article examine sageism in a range of political, social, and cultural manifestos that have a productive role in encoding tacit assumptions and stereotypes about older people’s lives. Particular attention is given to the pervasive use of the concept of “dependency,” a stereotypic and productive ageist mechanism that continues to infiltrate what are arguably more inclusive strategies directed toward a global model of aging well. The authors explore some potential strategies to combat stereotypes and warn that aging well initiatives based on individualism and “self-responsibility” risk reproducing existing power relations that continue to inform ageist stereotypes.","PeriodicalId":220319,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Applied Gerontology","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"292","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Applied Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464805285745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 292

Abstract

At the beginning of the 21st century, the new mantra—“successful” and “resourceful” aging—is used interchangeably and intoned often unreflectively by a society eager to find ways to reduce aged-related losses. Yet despite numerous empirical studies and public health promotion strategies directed at ways of aging well, negative images of aging have an enduring vitality. This article examine sageism in a range of political, social, and cultural manifestos that have a productive role in encoding tacit assumptions and stereotypes about older people’s lives. Particular attention is given to the pervasive use of the concept of “dependency,” a stereotypic and productive ageist mechanism that continues to infiltrate what are arguably more inclusive strategies directed toward a global model of aging well. The authors explore some potential strategies to combat stereotypes and warn that aging well initiatives based on individualism and “self-responsibility” risk reproducing existing power relations that continue to inform ageist stereotypes.
年龄歧视:21世纪对“健康老龄化”的威胁
在21世纪初,“成功的”和“机智的”老龄化这两种新的口头禅被交替使用,并且经常被一个渴望找到减少老龄化相关损失的方法的社会不假思索地吟诵。然而,尽管有大量的实证研究和公共健康促进战略指向的方式老化,老化的负面形象具有持久的生命力。本文研究了一系列政治、社会和文化宣言中的圣贤主义,这些宣言在编码关于老年人生活的隐性假设和刻板印象方面发挥了积极作用。特别关注的是“依赖”概念的普遍使用,这是一种刻板的、富有成效的年龄歧视机制,它继续渗透到可以论证的更具包容性的战略中,这些战略指向全球老龄化模式。作者探讨了一些对抗刻板印象的潜在策略,并警告说,基于个人主义和“自我责任”的老龄化计划有可能再现现有的权力关系,而这种关系将继续为年龄歧视的刻板印象提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信