{"title":"Comparison of Sevoflurane and Halothane Anesthesia Cognitive Function in Adult","authors":"Md Abdul Baki, Kawser Ahmed, Rizowana Akter, Nirmal Kumar Barman, Md. Monwar Hossein, Ashutosh Sharma, Shiladitya Shil","doi":"10.36348/gajms.2023.v05i03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients reach their full cognitive and psychomotor potential during the intermediate period of recovery. We still utilize Halothane, which has a delayed recovery profile, despite the fact that rapid clearance drugs like Sevoflurane have a positive impact on early cognitive recovery, which permits early mobility and reduces post-surgical complications. Objective: The study's goal was to promote the use of sevoflurane over halothane by contrasting the two anesthetics' effects on patients' cognitive functioning after surgery. Method: The prospective randomized comparative study was carried out in the Department of Anaesthesia, Analgesia and Intensive Care Medicine, between the period of September 2021 to June 2022. Study population was the patients of either sex, aged between18-50 years, ASA-I and II, patients undergoing elective surgery by general anaesthesia, lasting for 1 hour or more and remaining 24 hours after surgery. A total number of 100 patients were divided into two groups. 50 patients were in Sevoflurane group and 50 in Halothane group. Results: Group- Sevoflurane had a considerably faster emergence time (10.85 min vs. 15.13 min, P0.001) than Group- Halothane. Group- Sevoflurane had a mean BAMSE score of 29 at baseline and showed no change by the conclusion of the observation period, but Group- Halothane saw their scores both drop and then recover. Patients in Group- Sevoflurane finished the (TMT-A) 30 minutes after regaining consciousness in a considerably shorter amount of time (40. 9 seconds vs. 55. 8 seconds, P 0.001). Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups after 1.5 hours, 2.5 hours, or 3.5 hours. Conclusion: So the study concludes that adult patient of sevoflurane group experienced an early post-operative cognitive recovery than halothane group. Though sevoflurane is costly, considering the benefits of patients in terms of early cognitive recovery that causes less postoperative complications and shorter hospital stay, sevoflurane should be used instead of halothane.","PeriodicalId":397187,"journal":{"name":"Global Academic Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Academic Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36348/gajms.2023.v05i03.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Patients reach their full cognitive and psychomotor potential during the intermediate period of recovery. We still utilize Halothane, which has a delayed recovery profile, despite the fact that rapid clearance drugs like Sevoflurane have a positive impact on early cognitive recovery, which permits early mobility and reduces post-surgical complications. Objective: The study's goal was to promote the use of sevoflurane over halothane by contrasting the two anesthetics' effects on patients' cognitive functioning after surgery. Method: The prospective randomized comparative study was carried out in the Department of Anaesthesia, Analgesia and Intensive Care Medicine, between the period of September 2021 to June 2022. Study population was the patients of either sex, aged between18-50 years, ASA-I and II, patients undergoing elective surgery by general anaesthesia, lasting for 1 hour or more and remaining 24 hours after surgery. A total number of 100 patients were divided into two groups. 50 patients were in Sevoflurane group and 50 in Halothane group. Results: Group- Sevoflurane had a considerably faster emergence time (10.85 min vs. 15.13 min, P0.001) than Group- Halothane. Group- Sevoflurane had a mean BAMSE score of 29 at baseline and showed no change by the conclusion of the observation period, but Group- Halothane saw their scores both drop and then recover. Patients in Group- Sevoflurane finished the (TMT-A) 30 minutes after regaining consciousness in a considerably shorter amount of time (40. 9 seconds vs. 55. 8 seconds, P 0.001). Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups after 1.5 hours, 2.5 hours, or 3.5 hours. Conclusion: So the study concludes that adult patient of sevoflurane group experienced an early post-operative cognitive recovery than halothane group. Though sevoflurane is costly, considering the benefits of patients in terms of early cognitive recovery that causes less postoperative complications and shorter hospital stay, sevoflurane should be used instead of halothane.
背景:患者的认知和精神运动潜能在康复的中期得到充分发挥。尽管像七氟烷这样的快速清除药物对早期认知恢复有积极影响,允许早期活动并减少术后并发症,但我们仍然使用氟烷,它具有延迟恢复的特征。目的:本研究的目的是通过对比七氟醚和氟烷两种麻醉剂对术后患者认知功能的影响来促进七氟醚比氟烷的使用。方法:前瞻性随机对照研究于2021年9月至2022年6月在我院麻醉镇痛及重症医学科开展。研究人群为年龄在18-50岁之间,ASA-I和II级的患者,接受选择性全麻手术,持续1小时或更长时间,术后24小时。将100例患者分为两组。七氟醚组50例,氟烷组50例。结果:七氟醚组的急救时间(10.85 min vs. 15.13 min, P0.001)明显快于氟烷组。七氟醚组在基线时的平均BAMSE评分为29分,在观察期结束时没有变化,但氟烷组的评分先是下降,然后又恢复。七氟醚组患者在恢复意识后30分钟内完成TMT-A,时间较短(40分钟)。9秒对55秒。8秒,P < 0.001)。此外,在1.5小时、2.5小时和3.5小时后,两组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:七氟醚组成年患者术后认知功能恢复较氟烷组早。虽然七氟醚价格昂贵,但考虑到患者在早期认知恢复方面的益处,减少术后并发症和缩短住院时间,七氟醚应取代氟烷。