The Story of Stewardship and Ecological Restoration

Emily Barritt
{"title":"The Story of Stewardship and Ecological Restoration","authors":"Emily Barritt","doi":"10.4324/9780429468315-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter seeks to reorient the restoration movement towards a relationship focused activity, away from the singled minded focus on the scientific practice of meticulous replication of past ecosystems. That is, instead of simply prioritising the restoration of particular landscapes or ecosystems as a matter of natural fact, ecological restoration should be concerned with imbuing the human/nature relationship – across the different scales at which these relationships occur – with characteristics that will allow each to flourish. The central claim, is that this necessary reconciliation can be facilitated, maintained and built upon if the human/nature relationship is rooted in the idea of stewardship values. From individual landowners to states, from small communities to the global one, stewardship can help restore the balance between humans and the natural world. This is because of both the deeply entrenched and cross-cultural ethical values that are embodied in the concept of stewardship and because of its focus on collective participation in the task of caring for the natural world. Viewed as a movement towards better stewardship relationships with the natural world, restoration can therefore have both a backward-looking, and a forward-looking focus. In short, restoration should be as much about achieving a restored relationship to our environment, as it is the state of the environment itself. This relational turn in the restoration movement, is intended to provide a firm foundation for resistance to exploitative human/nature relations and in so doing to embed restoration practices across political, social and legal scales as well as geographical ones. Thus, the ostensibly scientific practice of restoration becomes accessible across communities and can begin to rebalance the disorder of the Capitalocene/Anthropocene era.","PeriodicalId":162363,"journal":{"name":"GeographyRN: Economic Activity & Economies (Sub-Topic)","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeographyRN: Economic Activity & Economies (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429468315-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This chapter seeks to reorient the restoration movement towards a relationship focused activity, away from the singled minded focus on the scientific practice of meticulous replication of past ecosystems. That is, instead of simply prioritising the restoration of particular landscapes or ecosystems as a matter of natural fact, ecological restoration should be concerned with imbuing the human/nature relationship – across the different scales at which these relationships occur – with characteristics that will allow each to flourish. The central claim, is that this necessary reconciliation can be facilitated, maintained and built upon if the human/nature relationship is rooted in the idea of stewardship values. From individual landowners to states, from small communities to the global one, stewardship can help restore the balance between humans and the natural world. This is because of both the deeply entrenched and cross-cultural ethical values that are embodied in the concept of stewardship and because of its focus on collective participation in the task of caring for the natural world. Viewed as a movement towards better stewardship relationships with the natural world, restoration can therefore have both a backward-looking, and a forward-looking focus. In short, restoration should be as much about achieving a restored relationship to our environment, as it is the state of the environment itself. This relational turn in the restoration movement, is intended to provide a firm foundation for resistance to exploitative human/nature relations and in so doing to embed restoration practices across political, social and legal scales as well as geographical ones. Thus, the ostensibly scientific practice of restoration becomes accessible across communities and can begin to rebalance the disorder of the Capitalocene/Anthropocene era.
管理和生态恢复的故事
本章试图将恢复运动重新定位为以关系为中心的活动,远离对过去生态系统细致复制的科学实践的单一关注。也就是说,与其简单地将特定景观或生态系统的恢复作为一种自然事实来优先考虑,生态恢复应该关注的是将人与自然的关系——跨越这些关系发生的不同尺度——赋予能够使双方都蓬勃发展的特征。核心主张是,如果人与自然的关系根植于管理价值观的观念,这种必要的和解就可以得到促进、维持和建立。从个人土地所有者到国家,从小型社区到全球社区,管理可以帮助恢复人类与自然世界之间的平衡。这是因为管理概念所体现的根深蒂固的跨文化伦理价值,也因为它注重集体参与照顾自然世界的任务。因此,作为一种与自然世界建立更好的管理关系的运动,修复既可以回顾过去,也可以着眼于未来。简而言之,恢复应该是恢复我们与环境的关系,就像恢复环境本身的状态一样。恢复运动中的这种关系转变,旨在为抵抗剥削性的人类/自然关系提供坚实的基础,并以此将恢复实践嵌入政治、社会和法律层面以及地理层面。因此,表面上科学的恢复实践在各个社区都可以实现,并且可以开始重新平衡资本世/人类世时代的混乱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信