EU-ERWEITERUNG IN KRISENZEITEN? ZUR BEITRITTSREIFE DER BEITRITTSKANDIDATEN VOM WESTBALKAN (EU Enlargement in Times of Crisis? Readiness for Accession of the Western Balkan Candidate Countries)

Klaus Schrader, C. Laaser
{"title":"EU-ERWEITERUNG IN KRISENZEITEN? ZUR BEITRITTSREIFE DER BEITRITTSKANDIDATEN VOM WESTBALKAN (EU Enlargement in Times of Crisis? Readiness for Accession of the Western Balkan Candidate Countries)","authors":"Klaus Schrader, C. Laaser","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3522715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>German Abstract:</b> Zusammenfassung In diesem Papier wird analysiert, inwieweit die Staaten des Westbalkans die notwendige wirtschaftliche und institutionelle Reife für einen EU-Beitritt erreicht haben. In der Studie werden die vier Staaten untersucht, die bereits Kandidatenstatus haben: Albanien, Montenegro, Nord-Mazedonien und Serbien. Die Autoren beschreiben, wie die EU derzeit den Stand des Beitrittsprozesses bewertet. Sie analysieren, welchen wirtschaftlichen Entwicklungsstand die Westbalkanstaaten bisher erreicht haben und welche möglichen Entwicklungspfade für einen Aufholprozess möglich erscheinen. Darüber hinaus bewerten sie die institutionellen Rahmenbedingungen in diesen Ländern auf der Grundlage internationaler Standortrankings, die unabhängige Informationen über den institutionellen Aufholprozess der Länder enthalten. Die Autoren berechnen zudem die Kosten, die der EU entstehen, wenn diese Kandidatenländer Zugang zu den bestehenden Struktur- und Investitionsfonds der EU erhalten.<br><br><b>English Abstract:</b> The topicality of the paper’s subject “EU accession of the Western Balkan Countries” results from the fact that despite the unresolved crises in the EU, in autumn 2019 the EU member states will decide whether to open accession negotiations with the Western Balkan states of North Macedonia and Albania. Due to doubts concerning the readiness of accession of these countries, the discussion on an alternative option for EU integration between full membership and non-membership for countries that are only partially ready for accession is reviving. The focus here is particularly on economic integration. The corresponding objective of the paper is to clarify whether from an economic point of view doubts about the accession readiness of northern Macedonia and Albania, as well as of the other Western Balkan accession candidates Montenegro and Serbia, are justified. The research tasks in this contribution are reflected in the following modules: drawing conclusions from evaluations by the EU, a statistical analysis of the economic development in the candidate countries, the simulation of convergence processes for each Western Balkan state, the evaluation of international country rankings and finally the execution of a cost analysis of the EU accession of the Western Balkan states. Problematic enlargement plans of the European Union. <br><br>In the European Union (EU), which has grown to 28 member states, centrifugal forces are becoming increasingly visible: the efforts of the United Kingdom to withdraw from the EU, the smouldering economic crisis in Southern Europe, the strong differences in refugee and immigration policy, the North-South conflict over the future of the Stability and Growth Pact or the controversial question of further deepening EU integration point to fundamental differences within the EU. In view of a large number of unresolved problems in the current EU, it would be reasonable that the further enlargement of the Community will not be on the European policy agenda. Especially the enlargements during the last 15 years have made the political consensus building in the EU increasingly difficult and can explain the drifting apart of the member states in many policy fields. But a new enlargement of the EU is still planned.<br><br>Following their strategy of an Eastern enlargement, in 2004 the EU accepted the majority of Central and Eastern European reform states as full members. The accession of Bulgaria and Romania (2007) as well as Croatia (2013) completed this enlargement process by countries in the Balkans that had been comparatively economically weak or politically unstable until then. From the EU's point of view, however, enlargement is not yet completed — despite all the integration problems that have come to light. <br><br>In the “Thessaloniki Declaration” in June 2003, the Western Balkan states of Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Macedonia (Northern Macedonia since 2019), Serbia and Montenegro and, with restrictions, Kosovo were also given the prospect of accession. This was reaffirmed in the “Sofia Declaration” in May 2018.<br><br>This enlargement project seems to focus less on the enlargement of the EU internal market, which is not surprising given the small size and limited economic potential of these candidate countries. Rather, it is a project for the political stabilization of the Western Balkans, as can be seen from the highlighted objectives: strengthening democracy and the rule of law, fighting crime and corruption, and pacifying regional conflicts. The establishment of functioning market economies is seen as a vehicle to achieve these goals and also to curb migration from these states to the EU. Therefore, the creation of a perspective for young people to stay in the EU plays a special role.","PeriodicalId":296326,"journal":{"name":"International Institutions: European Union eJournal","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Institutions: European Union eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3522715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

German Abstract: Zusammenfassung In diesem Papier wird analysiert, inwieweit die Staaten des Westbalkans die notwendige wirtschaftliche und institutionelle Reife für einen EU-Beitritt erreicht haben. In der Studie werden die vier Staaten untersucht, die bereits Kandidatenstatus haben: Albanien, Montenegro, Nord-Mazedonien und Serbien. Die Autoren beschreiben, wie die EU derzeit den Stand des Beitrittsprozesses bewertet. Sie analysieren, welchen wirtschaftlichen Entwicklungsstand die Westbalkanstaaten bisher erreicht haben und welche möglichen Entwicklungspfade für einen Aufholprozess möglich erscheinen. Darüber hinaus bewerten sie die institutionellen Rahmenbedingungen in diesen Ländern auf der Grundlage internationaler Standortrankings, die unabhängige Informationen über den institutionellen Aufholprozess der Länder enthalten. Die Autoren berechnen zudem die Kosten, die der EU entstehen, wenn diese Kandidatenländer Zugang zu den bestehenden Struktur- und Investitionsfonds der EU erhalten.

English Abstract: The topicality of the paper’s subject “EU accession of the Western Balkan Countries” results from the fact that despite the unresolved crises in the EU, in autumn 2019 the EU member states will decide whether to open accession negotiations with the Western Balkan states of North Macedonia and Albania. Due to doubts concerning the readiness of accession of these countries, the discussion on an alternative option for EU integration between full membership and non-membership for countries that are only partially ready for accession is reviving. The focus here is particularly on economic integration. The corresponding objective of the paper is to clarify whether from an economic point of view doubts about the accession readiness of northern Macedonia and Albania, as well as of the other Western Balkan accession candidates Montenegro and Serbia, are justified. The research tasks in this contribution are reflected in the following modules: drawing conclusions from evaluations by the EU, a statistical analysis of the economic development in the candidate countries, the simulation of convergence processes for each Western Balkan state, the evaluation of international country rankings and finally the execution of a cost analysis of the EU accession of the Western Balkan states. Problematic enlargement plans of the European Union.

In the European Union (EU), which has grown to 28 member states, centrifugal forces are becoming increasingly visible: the efforts of the United Kingdom to withdraw from the EU, the smouldering economic crisis in Southern Europe, the strong differences in refugee and immigration policy, the North-South conflict over the future of the Stability and Growth Pact or the controversial question of further deepening EU integration point to fundamental differences within the EU. In view of a large number of unresolved problems in the current EU, it would be reasonable that the further enlargement of the Community will not be on the European policy agenda. Especially the enlargements during the last 15 years have made the political consensus building in the EU increasingly difficult and can explain the drifting apart of the member states in many policy fields. But a new enlargement of the EU is still planned.

Following their strategy of an Eastern enlargement, in 2004 the EU accepted the majority of Central and Eastern European reform states as full members. The accession of Bulgaria and Romania (2007) as well as Croatia (2013) completed this enlargement process by countries in the Balkans that had been comparatively economically weak or politically unstable until then. From the EU's point of view, however, enlargement is not yet completed — despite all the integration problems that have come to light.

In the “Thessaloniki Declaration” in June 2003, the Western Balkan states of Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Macedonia (Northern Macedonia since 2019), Serbia and Montenegro and, with restrictions, Kosovo were also given the prospect of accession. This was reaffirmed in the “Sofia Declaration” in May 2018.

This enlargement project seems to focus less on the enlargement of the EU internal market, which is not surprising given the small size and limited economic potential of these candidate countries. Rather, it is a project for the political stabilization of the Western Balkans, as can be seen from the highlighted objectives: strengthening democracy and the rule of law, fighting crime and corruption, and pacifying regional conflicts. The establishment of functioning market economies is seen as a vehicle to achieve these goals and also to curb migration from these states to the EU. Therefore, the creation of a perspective for young people to stay in the EU plays a special role.
危机时欧盟东扩?应对西巴尔干入盟事务的准备西方巴尔干国家想想
德抽象:本论文的摘要将分析巴尔干西部各国如何达到了加入欧盟所必需的经济和制度成熟。本研究对已经被提名的四个国家:阿尔巴尼亚、黑山、马其顿北部和塞尔维亚进行了调查。作者描述了目前欧盟对入盟进程的评估。事实上,他们分析西巴尔干国家目前所达到的经济发展水平以及它们作为一项赶超进程的发展选择。它们还基于国际定位系统,提供了关于各国制度赶超进程的独立信息。作者还计算了如果这些准成员国能够进入欧盟的现有结构和投资基金,欧盟的成本。英语Abstract:《The topicality纸业subject”欧盟accession《西部巴尔干与saber从The fact这样尽管unresolved crises《欧盟心脏2019年《欧盟中共美国想decide whether to open accession negotiations戴着西部巴尔干黎巴嫩,北Macedonia and Albania .要考虑是否废除这些国家的必要而非有的有的方式来加入欧盟。美国经济一体化的集中该书读到由经济情况预测的《美国北部马塞多尼亚和阿尔巴尼亚的经济情况》,以及其他西巴尔干半岛半岛的黑山和塞尔维亚接壤,在法律上得到认可。The tasks文化研究在this contribution在出现在梦中的经验modules: drawing conclusions从evaluations欧盟对a statistical分析《经济发展与candidate的模拟》安哲秀processes for萨西巴尔干州的评估》国际乡村排名and finally The execution of a花费分析《欧盟accession《西部巴尔干美国.。欧洲联盟危险管理专案《欧洲联盟(欧盟)的有一种grown to 28中共与centrifugal远征军在becoming increasingly visible:《联合王国to withdraw efforts笛子的欧盟的smouldering economic crisis)在南方欧洲联合的路段关闭是因为他们在refugee and移民政策,the North-South conflict management, the future of the Stability and增长or the Pact controversial point to question of克尔deepening欧盟一体化的是因为他们~会欧盟.从当今欧盟难以解决的问题来看,我们知道对这些社区的长期管理必然会变成不存在的欧洲政策议程了。成员在玩过15年之后的实际交往造成了欧盟的政治一致大厦。他们既解释了会员国在其他政策领域的相互联系,也可以解释他们的行为。但欧盟应对的新局面仍在计划之中遵循东部管理的战略,欧盟在2004年就接受了中欧及东欧改革的大国。2007年保加利亚和罗马尼亚的行为(2007年)满足了这些巴尔干半岛国家反垄断的情况(2013年)。从欧盟的观点看,态度和管理不符合我们的利益导致完全的一体化在2003年茱安的《萨洛尼基宣言》、波斯尼亚黑塞哥维那西部巴尔干州、波士尼亚州、塞波尼亚州(2019年的rocedonia)、塞族和黑山、限制性和科索沃等地区,也应作入伍展望。这是在2018年五月的索菲亚精神故事里的泡汤。欧盟内部市场管理中,这些缩水式的财政听起来似乎不太可能过量使用。莱达,这是一项西巴尔干政治稳定的工程,可以追溯到那些高低等级的作品:为正义而作的严格分类和法制、质疑和贪责,以及太平洋区域冲突。市场经济人组就是一只杀人道具,也就是从州到欧盟的迁徙。这里可以看到年轻人住在欧盟特别乏味的道具的广阔前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信