LIETUVOS DIDŽIOSIOS KUNIGAIKŠTYSTĖS KARIUOMENĖS KASDIENINIO GYVENIMO STANDARTAI 1764–1788 M.

Valdas Rakutis
{"title":"LIETUVOS DIDŽIOSIOS KUNIGAIKŠTYSTĖS KARIUOMENĖS KASDIENINIO GYVENIMO STANDARTAI 1764–1788 M.","authors":"Valdas Rakutis","doi":"10.33918/XVIIIASTUDIJOS/T.4/A8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyses ordinary life of the Armed Forces of the Grand Duchy of\nLithuania in the period between the beginning of the rule by the King of Poland\nand the Grand Duke of Lithuania Stanisław August Poniatowski, and until the\nreforms by the Four-Year Sejm (1788–1792). In the period of interest it was a small\n(up to 4,000 soldiers), independent army, made up from national contractors,\nmostly cavalry detachments, the main unit being a flag of 30–100 soldiers, and the\nso-called foreign contractors (cavalry, infantry and artillery), the main unit being\na company of 60–100 soldiers. In 1775–1777, division by contractors’ ethnicity\nwas replaced with the territorial divisions. The main changes took place in the\nnational cavalry, where two equally sized brigades of hussars and petyhorcy were\ncreated, whereas majority of foreign contractors were reorganized into infantry.\nPeace-time armed forces was an important factor for the Lithuanian public,\nthe ruling elite and the local communities. Army was not a tool for use in large\ninternational politics, it was more of a current order preserving instrument. Army\nsupply system was based on the independent economic unit, governed by the unit\ncommander. Attempts by the Lithuanian Military Commission to impose greater\ncontrol gave insignificant results, although the reforms of 1775–1775 were able\nto strengthen control of the treasury and procedures, making relationships more\nvisible and transparent, and the actual composition of the armed forces was very\nclose to the theoretical provisions. The economic weakness of the nation after the\nFirst Partition of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and lack of correlation\nbetween recovery of the treasury and army financing put bridles on the army,\npreventing it from development and change. In spite of all 1764–1788 reforms,\nthe Lithuanian armed forces remained a stagnating institution, where routine and\nestablished traditions dominated over novelty and change.\n\nKeywords: Armed Forces of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, ordinary army life,\nrule of Stanisław Poniatowski, Military Commission, Military Department of the\nPermanent Council.","PeriodicalId":407662,"journal":{"name":"Lietuvos Didžioji Kunigaikštystė Visuomenė. Kasdienybės istorija","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lietuvos Didžioji Kunigaikštystė Visuomenė. Kasdienybės istorija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33918/XVIIIASTUDIJOS/T.4/A8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyses ordinary life of the Armed Forces of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the period between the beginning of the rule by the King of Poland and the Grand Duke of Lithuania Stanisław August Poniatowski, and until the reforms by the Four-Year Sejm (1788–1792). In the period of interest it was a small (up to 4,000 soldiers), independent army, made up from national contractors, mostly cavalry detachments, the main unit being a flag of 30–100 soldiers, and the so-called foreign contractors (cavalry, infantry and artillery), the main unit being a company of 60–100 soldiers. In 1775–1777, division by contractors’ ethnicity was replaced with the territorial divisions. The main changes took place in the national cavalry, where two equally sized brigades of hussars and petyhorcy were created, whereas majority of foreign contractors were reorganized into infantry. Peace-time armed forces was an important factor for the Lithuanian public, the ruling elite and the local communities. Army was not a tool for use in large international politics, it was more of a current order preserving instrument. Army supply system was based on the independent economic unit, governed by the unit commander. Attempts by the Lithuanian Military Commission to impose greater control gave insignificant results, although the reforms of 1775–1775 were able to strengthen control of the treasury and procedures, making relationships more visible and transparent, and the actual composition of the armed forces was very close to the theoretical provisions. The economic weakness of the nation after the First Partition of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and lack of correlation between recovery of the treasury and army financing put bridles on the army, preventing it from development and change. In spite of all 1764–1788 reforms, the Lithuanian armed forces remained a stagnating institution, where routine and established traditions dominated over novelty and change. Keywords: Armed Forces of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, ordinary army life, rule of Stanisław Poniatowski, Military Commission, Military Department of the Permanent Council.
本文分析了波兰国王和立陶宛大公Stanisław奥古斯特·波尼亚托夫斯基(August Poniatowski)统治开始至四年瑟姆(1788-1792)改革期间立陶宛大公国武装部队的日常生活。在有兴趣的时期,它是一个小的(多达4000名士兵),独立的军队,由国家承包商组成,主要是骑兵分队,主要单位是30-100名士兵的旗,以及所谓的外国承包商(骑兵,步兵和炮兵),主要单位是一个60-100名士兵的连。1775-1777年,承包者的种族划分被地域划分所取代。主要的变化发生在国家骑兵,创建了两个同等规模的轻骑兵旅和轻骑旅,而大多数外国承包商被重组为步兵。和平时期的武装部队对立陶宛公众、统治精英和当地社区来说是一个重要因素。军队不是大型国际政治中使用的工具,它更像是维护当前秩序的工具。军队供给体系以独立的经济单位为基础,由单位指挥员管理。立陶宛军事委员会试图施加更大的控制,但收效甚微,尽管1775年至1775年的改革能够加强对财政和程序的控制,使关系更加可见和透明,武装部队的实际组成非常接近理论规定。波兰立陶宛联邦第一次瓜分后,国家经济疲软,国库恢复与军队财政缺乏相关性,这给军队带来了束缚,阻碍了它的发展和变化。尽管在1764-1788年间进行了所有的改革,立陶宛军队仍然是一个停滞不前的机构,在那里,常规和既定的传统支配着新奇和变化。关键词:立陶宛大公国武装力量,普通军队生活,Stanisław波尼亚托夫斯基统治,军事委员会,常任理事会军事部门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信