The adult respiratory distress syndrome: Volumetric overload shocks in patho-etiology, correcting errors and misconceptions on fluid therapy, vascular and capillary physiology

A. Ghanem
{"title":"The adult respiratory distress syndrome: Volumetric overload shocks in patho-etiology, correcting errors and misconceptions on fluid therapy, vascular and capillary physiology","authors":"A. Ghanem","doi":"10.31031/smoaj.2018.02.000534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and Objective: To report critical literature analysis that shows Volumetric Overload Shock (VOS) is the real patho-etiology of the Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) demonstrating multiple errors and misconceptions on fluid therapy that predisposes to VOS and ARDS. Material and Methods: The literature on ARDS and physiological law of starling is critically analyzed revealing the multiple errors and misconceptions prevailing in fluid therapy. Recent reports on VOS in the patho-etiology of ARDS are summarized. Results: The literature on ARDS and physiological law of starling is critically analyzed revealing multiple errors and misconceptions. Starling’s law is wrong as both of its forces do not work as proposed. Errors have been corrected and the hydrodynamics of porous orifice G tube are advanced as replacement for Starling’s law. The evidence confirmed VOS induced by sodium-based fluids is the real patho-etiology of ARDS. Conclusion: The critical literature analysis on ARDS and physiological law of Starling rectified many errors and misconceptions. The hydrodynamics of the G tube in a surrounding chamber C that mimics capillary-interstitial compartment shows a magnetic fluid shaped phenomenon that gives a real replacement for Starling’s law for the capillary-interstitial fluid transfer. The VOS proved to be the real patho-etiology of ARDS.","PeriodicalId":283483,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Medicine Open Access Journal","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Medicine Open Access Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31031/smoaj.2018.02.000534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Introduction and Objective: To report critical literature analysis that shows Volumetric Overload Shock (VOS) is the real patho-etiology of the Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) demonstrating multiple errors and misconceptions on fluid therapy that predisposes to VOS and ARDS. Material and Methods: The literature on ARDS and physiological law of starling is critically analyzed revealing the multiple errors and misconceptions prevailing in fluid therapy. Recent reports on VOS in the patho-etiology of ARDS are summarized. Results: The literature on ARDS and physiological law of starling is critically analyzed revealing multiple errors and misconceptions. Starling’s law is wrong as both of its forces do not work as proposed. Errors have been corrected and the hydrodynamics of porous orifice G tube are advanced as replacement for Starling’s law. The evidence confirmed VOS induced by sodium-based fluids is the real patho-etiology of ARDS. Conclusion: The critical literature analysis on ARDS and physiological law of Starling rectified many errors and misconceptions. The hydrodynamics of the G tube in a surrounding chamber C that mimics capillary-interstitial compartment shows a magnetic fluid shaped phenomenon that gives a real replacement for Starling’s law for the capillary-interstitial fluid transfer. The VOS proved to be the real patho-etiology of ARDS.
成人呼吸窘迫综合征:容量过载冲击的病理病因,纠正错误和误解的液体治疗,血管和毛细血管生理学
简介和目的:报告重要的文献分析,表明容量过载休克(VOS)是成人呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的真正病理病因,证明了对液体治疗的多重错误和误解,这些错误和误解易导致VOS和ARDS。材料与方法:批判性地分析了有关ARDS和八哥生理规律的文献,揭示了液体治疗中普遍存在的多种错误和误解。综述了近年来关于VOS在ARDS病理病因学中的研究报道。结果:对有关ARDS和椋鸟生理规律的文献进行批判性分析,揭示了许多错误和误解。斯特林定律是错误的,因为它的两种力都不像设想的那样起作用。修正了误差,提出了多孔孔口G管的流体力学,代替了斯塔林定律。有证据证实,钠基液体引起的VOS是ARDS的真正病理病因。结论:对ARDS和Starling生理规律的批判性文献分析纠正了许多错误和误解。G管在模拟毛细血管间隙室的周围腔室C中的流体动力学显示了一种磁流体形状的现象,这种现象真正取代了斯特林定律。VOS被证明是ARDS的真正病理病因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信