Deliberative Systems

J. Parkinson
{"title":"Deliberative Systems","authors":"J. Parkinson","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.013.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The deliberative systems approach focuses on “deliberative” as an adjectival quality of democratic systems, whether small-scale or large, rather than on “deliberation” as a noun. But how systems come to merit that adjective rather than any other is still an open question. This chapter addresses that by way of four subsidiary questions, which result in claims that deliberation is just one of several communicative modes in a democracy; that practices and systems need to be seen in light of power relations, especially agenda power; that systems are often better seen as processes, not venues, dynamic things occupied by purposive agents and not just formal, static relationships between institutions; and that the deliberative quality of a system might be best thought of in summative rather than additive terms. The chapter is, above all, a call to repoliticize deliberative scholarship.","PeriodicalId":185217,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"63","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.013.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63

Abstract

The deliberative systems approach focuses on “deliberative” as an adjectival quality of democratic systems, whether small-scale or large, rather than on “deliberation” as a noun. But how systems come to merit that adjective rather than any other is still an open question. This chapter addresses that by way of four subsidiary questions, which result in claims that deliberation is just one of several communicative modes in a democracy; that practices and systems need to be seen in light of power relations, especially agenda power; that systems are often better seen as processes, not venues, dynamic things occupied by purposive agents and not just formal, static relationships between institutions; and that the deliberative quality of a system might be best thought of in summative rather than additive terms. The chapter is, above all, a call to repoliticize deliberative scholarship.
协商系统
协商制度方法侧重于将“协商”作为民主制度的形容词性质,无论规模大小,而不是将“审议”作为名词。但是,系统是如何配得上这个形容词而不是其他形容词的,仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。本章通过四个附属问题来解决这个问题,这导致了审议只是民主中几种沟通模式之一的主张;实践和制度需要从权力关系,特别是议程权力的角度来看待;系统通常最好被视为过程,而不是场所,是由有目的的主体占据的动态事物,而不仅仅是机构之间正式的、静态的关系;一个系统的审议质量最好以总结性的方式来考虑,而不是累加性的方式。最重要的是,这一章呼吁将审议学术重新政治化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信