On some peculiar features in the introduction of the "entry-exit" tariff model on Ukrainian natural gas market

R. Yukhymets
{"title":"On some peculiar features in the introduction of the \"entry-exit\" tariff model on Ukrainian natural gas market","authors":"R. Yukhymets","doi":"10.15407/EIP2017.01.128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers the prerequisites of transformation of the national natural gas market and describes the main motivating factors determining the direction of reforms in its sectors. The topicality of implementing the model \"entry-exit\" on the gas market is examined both in the context of Ukraine's international commitments, and in the context of a series of crisis phenomena that have emerged in the sector of servicing and transportation of natural gas. The change of the market model in the sphere of gas transportation predetermines the principles of tariff formation for the services provided by the GTS operator. This determines the necessity of justification of the components in the system of tariff formation, such as: regulation of projected costs, amortization, regulatory base, regulatory phase of the standard income of transportation operator. The article analyses the experience of adjusting these components in other European countries and provides relevant recommendations for the national market. It is shown that such changes fundamentally transform the national market of natural gas. Transition from \"investment plus\" to the regulation of standard income means that operator's income on inserted investments, considering the level of expected investment risks, is sufficient for providing updating and development. The change of regulatory phase allows improving the predictability and creating prerequisites for involving new investments for long-term projects. The review of the methodology determining the regulatory base allows establishing a market price for the transport operators' main assets and making fully-fledged amortization deductions. It will give an opportunity to involve additional funds for renewal of the infrastructure and, based on the new price, establish objectively determined level of profitability of the transport operator in accordance with the new rates of spending, which are correctly accounted for and covered by the tariff rate. Determination of a compulsory rate of increasing annual performance creates prerequisites for reducing the costs and final tariff for the consumers. Analyzing the barriers to the implementation of \"entry-exit\" tariff model in Ukraine, author gives some recommendations for the adaption of transit agreements to the new conditions of the national market, determining trade zones, and removal of the current infrastructural and institutional restrictions, which hinder the model's implementation.","PeriodicalId":212761,"journal":{"name":"Economy and Forecasting","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economy and Forecasting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/EIP2017.01.128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The article considers the prerequisites of transformation of the national natural gas market and describes the main motivating factors determining the direction of reforms in its sectors. The topicality of implementing the model "entry-exit" on the gas market is examined both in the context of Ukraine's international commitments, and in the context of a series of crisis phenomena that have emerged in the sector of servicing and transportation of natural gas. The change of the market model in the sphere of gas transportation predetermines the principles of tariff formation for the services provided by the GTS operator. This determines the necessity of justification of the components in the system of tariff formation, such as: regulation of projected costs, amortization, regulatory base, regulatory phase of the standard income of transportation operator. The article analyses the experience of adjusting these components in other European countries and provides relevant recommendations for the national market. It is shown that such changes fundamentally transform the national market of natural gas. Transition from "investment plus" to the regulation of standard income means that operator's income on inserted investments, considering the level of expected investment risks, is sufficient for providing updating and development. The change of regulatory phase allows improving the predictability and creating prerequisites for involving new investments for long-term projects. The review of the methodology determining the regulatory base allows establishing a market price for the transport operators' main assets and making fully-fledged amortization deductions. It will give an opportunity to involve additional funds for renewal of the infrastructure and, based on the new price, establish objectively determined level of profitability of the transport operator in accordance with the new rates of spending, which are correctly accounted for and covered by the tariff rate. Determination of a compulsory rate of increasing annual performance creates prerequisites for reducing the costs and final tariff for the consumers. Analyzing the barriers to the implementation of "entry-exit" tariff model in Ukraine, author gives some recommendations for the adaption of transit agreements to the new conditions of the national market, determining trade zones, and removal of the current infrastructural and institutional restrictions, which hinder the model's implementation.
论乌克兰天然气市场引入“出入境”关税模式的一些特点
文章分析了我国天然气市场转型的前提条件,阐述了决定我国天然气行业改革方向的主要激励因素。在乌克兰的国际承诺的背景下,以及在天然气服务和运输部门出现的一系列危机现象的背景下,对天然气市场实施“出入境”模式的时效性进行了审查。天然气运输领域市场模式的变化预先决定了GTS运营商提供的服务的费率形成原则。这就决定了费率形成体系中各组成部分合理化的必要性,如:对预计成本的调整、摊销、调整基数、运输经营者标准收入的调整阶段。本文分析了欧洲其他国家对这些部件进行调整的经验,并对本国市场提出了相关建议。这表明,这些变化从根本上改变了全国天然气市场。从“投资+”向标准收益监管的转变,意味着考虑到预期的投资风险水平,运营商插入投资的收益足以提供更新和发展。监管阶段的变化允许提高可预测性,并为涉及长期项目的新投资创造先决条件。通过审查确定监管基础的方法,可以为运输运营商的主要资产建立一个市场价格,并进行全面的摊销扣除。它将提供一个机会,为更新基础设施提供额外的资金,并根据新的价格,根据新的支出率,确定运输经营者客观确定的盈利水平,这些支出率是正确计算和包括在关税税率之内的。确定年度业绩的强制性增长率为降低消费者的成本和最终关税创造了先决条件。分析了乌克兰实施“出入境”关税模式的障碍,提出了使过境协定适应国内市场新情况、确定贸易区、消除目前阻碍该模式实施的基础设施和制度限制等建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信