Alternative digital currencies in international monetary law: Global stablecoins

M. Dimitrijevic
{"title":"Alternative digital currencies in international monetary law: Global stablecoins","authors":"M. Dimitrijevic","doi":"10.5937/zrpfn1-34857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Alternative digital currencies were created to correct the shortcomings of the so-called first generation of cryptocurrencies. Their impact on the monetary order stability, systemic risk, and monetary policy strategy pursued by the Central Bank has been insufficiently examined, primarily because they are issued by large technology companies rather than the Central Bank as the custodian of monetary sovereignty. The treatment of cryptocurrencies in tort law is different from the monetary law standpoint. As such, the former is not considered in this paper because it is a private law relationship. On the other hand, monetary law refers to public law relations, including the regulatory powers of the Central Bank and the legal definition of alternative money by the provisions of the Central Bank law. As the supreme monetary institution, the Central Bank has a monopoly over the legal tender for designating and issuing money. In that sense, it would be useful to deal with the place and importance of alternative money in monetary law first, and then with other branches of private and public law. In legal terms, the acceptance and circulation of alternative money impose simultaneous (and highly demanding) consideration of the legal nature of cryptocurrency, where we can see the primacy of the social theory of money over state monetary nominalism. However, this primacy must be only temporary because the historical development of money (in all its forms) clearly shows that the emergence of any currency must sooner or later be regulated by adequate laws, for the sake of legal security and preservation of monetary stability. In a way, the accelerated technical-technological development has \"caused\" the existing status quo in the classical and (to some extent) the contemporary monetary law thought about how money is legally defined and who can take the role of money issuer, which has shaken the centuries-old awareness of the nature and functions of money in modern society. The circumstances that have influenced the reconsideration of already acquired habits include the emergence of reduced use of cash in circulation, the emergence of \"sharing\" technology that enabled the creation of cryptocurrencies, the announcement of leading technology and other multinational companies on issuing private cryptocurrencies, as well as the circumstances related to the global economic and financial crisis and the Covid-19 pandemic which point to certain advantages of alternative money.","PeriodicalId":192224,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Nis","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Nis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfn1-34857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alternative digital currencies were created to correct the shortcomings of the so-called first generation of cryptocurrencies. Their impact on the monetary order stability, systemic risk, and monetary policy strategy pursued by the Central Bank has been insufficiently examined, primarily because they are issued by large technology companies rather than the Central Bank as the custodian of monetary sovereignty. The treatment of cryptocurrencies in tort law is different from the monetary law standpoint. As such, the former is not considered in this paper because it is a private law relationship. On the other hand, monetary law refers to public law relations, including the regulatory powers of the Central Bank and the legal definition of alternative money by the provisions of the Central Bank law. As the supreme monetary institution, the Central Bank has a monopoly over the legal tender for designating and issuing money. In that sense, it would be useful to deal with the place and importance of alternative money in monetary law first, and then with other branches of private and public law. In legal terms, the acceptance and circulation of alternative money impose simultaneous (and highly demanding) consideration of the legal nature of cryptocurrency, where we can see the primacy of the social theory of money over state monetary nominalism. However, this primacy must be only temporary because the historical development of money (in all its forms) clearly shows that the emergence of any currency must sooner or later be regulated by adequate laws, for the sake of legal security and preservation of monetary stability. In a way, the accelerated technical-technological development has "caused" the existing status quo in the classical and (to some extent) the contemporary monetary law thought about how money is legally defined and who can take the role of money issuer, which has shaken the centuries-old awareness of the nature and functions of money in modern society. The circumstances that have influenced the reconsideration of already acquired habits include the emergence of reduced use of cash in circulation, the emergence of "sharing" technology that enabled the creation of cryptocurrencies, the announcement of leading technology and other multinational companies on issuing private cryptocurrencies, as well as the circumstances related to the global economic and financial crisis and the Covid-19 pandemic which point to certain advantages of alternative money.
国际货币法中的替代数字货币:全球稳定币
替代数字货币的创建是为了纠正所谓的第一代加密货币的缺点。它们对货币秩序稳定性、系统性风险和央行奉行的货币政策策略的影响一直没有得到充分的研究,主要是因为它们是由大型科技公司发行的,而不是由央行作为货币主权的保管人发行的。侵权法对加密货币的处理与货币法的立场不同。因此,前者属于私法关系,本文不考虑。另一方面,货币法是指公共法律关系,包括中央银行的监管权力和中央银行法规定的替代货币的法律定义。中央银行作为最高货币机构,垄断了法定货币的指定和发行。从这个意义上说,最好先讨论替代性货币在货币法中的地位和重要性,然后再讨论私法和公法的其他分支。从法律角度来看,替代货币的接受和流通要求同时(并且要求很高)考虑加密货币的法律性质,在这里我们可以看到社会货币理论高于国家货币唯名论。然而,这种首要地位必须只是暂时的,因为货币(各种形式)的历史发展清楚地表明,为了法律安全和保持货币稳定,任何货币的出现迟早都必须受到适当法律的管制。在某种程度上,加速的技术技术发展“造成”了古典和(某种程度上)当代货币法关于货币如何在法律上定义以及谁可以扮演货币发行者角色的现有现状,这动摇了现代社会几个世纪以来对货币性质和功能的认识。影响重新考虑已经形成的习惯的情况包括,流通中现金的使用减少,“共享”技术的出现使加密货币的创建成为可能,领先技术和其他跨国公司宣布发行私人加密货币,以及与全球经济和金融危机以及Covid-19大流行相关的情况,这些都表明了替代货币的某些优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信