Analysis of securing territories with states of the state geodesic network

I. Trevoho, D. Kukhtar, E. Ilkiv, M. Galyarnyk
{"title":"Analysis of securing territories with states of the state geodesic network","authors":"I. Trevoho, D. Kukhtar, E. Ilkiv, M. Galyarnyk","doi":"10.33841/1819-1339-2-42-35-43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the work is to investigate the possibilities of using geospatial analysis to assess the state of geodetic support of territories for mapping of different scales, on the example of Ivano-Frankivsk region. Method. Methods of geospatial analysis, in particular zoning of the territory by means of buffer polygons, and also application of a hexagonal grid are used for researches. Results. An algorithm for estimating the state of geodetic support of territories using the method of buffer zones and the method of hexagonal polygons is presented. A comparison of methods is performed and graphical schemes of both methods are presented. The analysis of the results allowed to establish that the state of geodetic support of the territories of the studied areas varies widely. For mapping on a scale of 1:10000 and 1:25000, geodetic support varies between 65–92 %, depending on the area. Bogorodchany district has the highest indicators, Horodenkivsky district has the lowest. The percentage of territories is reduced for larger scales of 1:5000 and 1:2000. Mapping on such a scale requires additional network thickening. The method of hexagonal polygons on average showed better results by 6.4 % than the method of buffer zones. The maximum difference between the calculated collateral obtained from the two methods is 9.7 %; the minimum is 2.4%. Scientific novelty and practical significance. The analysis of the provision of SGN points using geospatial analysis, on the example of Ivano-Frankivsk region, showed the feasibility of its use for these purposes. A comparative analysis of geospatial analysis methods to assess the state of geodetic support based on graphical materials and quantitative characteristics showed that the best results can be obtained using the method of hexagonal polygons. Using the method of buffer zones gives less reliable results. The proposed and researched approach can be used to study the provision of points of the State Geodetic Network for the whole territory of Ukraine, as well as for the territories of individual OTGs, districts and regions.","PeriodicalId":422474,"journal":{"name":"Modern achievements of geodesic science and industry","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern achievements of geodesic science and industry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33841/1819-1339-2-42-35-43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the work is to investigate the possibilities of using geospatial analysis to assess the state of geodetic support of territories for mapping of different scales, on the example of Ivano-Frankivsk region. Method. Methods of geospatial analysis, in particular zoning of the territory by means of buffer polygons, and also application of a hexagonal grid are used for researches. Results. An algorithm for estimating the state of geodetic support of territories using the method of buffer zones and the method of hexagonal polygons is presented. A comparison of methods is performed and graphical schemes of both methods are presented. The analysis of the results allowed to establish that the state of geodetic support of the territories of the studied areas varies widely. For mapping on a scale of 1:10000 and 1:25000, geodetic support varies between 65–92 %, depending on the area. Bogorodchany district has the highest indicators, Horodenkivsky district has the lowest. The percentage of territories is reduced for larger scales of 1:5000 and 1:2000. Mapping on such a scale requires additional network thickening. The method of hexagonal polygons on average showed better results by 6.4 % than the method of buffer zones. The maximum difference between the calculated collateral obtained from the two methods is 9.7 %; the minimum is 2.4%. Scientific novelty and practical significance. The analysis of the provision of SGN points using geospatial analysis, on the example of Ivano-Frankivsk region, showed the feasibility of its use for these purposes. A comparative analysis of geospatial analysis methods to assess the state of geodetic support based on graphical materials and quantitative characteristics showed that the best results can be obtained using the method of hexagonal polygons. Using the method of buffer zones gives less reliable results. The proposed and researched approach can be used to study the provision of points of the State Geodetic Network for the whole territory of Ukraine, as well as for the territories of individual OTGs, districts and regions.
国家测地线网与国家的领土安全分析
这项工作的目的是以伊万诺-弗兰科夫斯克地区为例,探讨利用地理空间分析来评估不同比例尺的领土的大地测量支持状况的可能性。方法。利用地理空间分析的方法,特别是利用缓冲多边形对领土进行分区,并应用六边形网格进行研究。结果。提出了一种基于缓冲区法和六边形法的区域大地支撑状态估计算法。对两种方法进行了比较,并给出了两种方法的图解方案。对结果的分析表明,所研究地区的大地测量支持状况差异很大。在1:10000和1:25000的比例尺上进行测绘时,大地测量支持度在65 - 92%之间,具体取决于区域。Bogorodchany区的指标最高,Horodenkivsky区的指标最低。在1:5000和1:2000的较大比例尺上,领土的百分比会减少。在这样的尺度上绘制地图需要额外的网络增厚。平均六角形多边形法比缓冲区法的效果好6.4%。两种方法计算的抵押品最大差值为9.7%;最低是2.4%。具有科学新颖性和现实意义。以伊万诺-弗兰科夫斯克地区为例,利用地理空间分析对提供SGN点进行了分析,显示了将其用于这些目的的可行性。对比分析了基于图形材料和定量特征的大地支撑状态评价的地理空间分析方法,结果表明,采用六角形多边形方法评价效果最好。使用缓冲区的方法得到的结果不太可靠。建议和研究的方法可用于研究为乌克兰全境提供国家大地测量网点的问题,以及为各个otg、区和地区的领土提供国家大地测量网点的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信