A comparative study on the layout of interface elements of two types of Web pages with different uses based on beauty degree calculation

Hu Yongzhe, Beibei Sun
{"title":"A comparative study on the layout of interface elements of two types of\n Web pages with different uses based on beauty degree calculation","authors":"Hu Yongzhe, Beibei Sun","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1002883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the beauty degree calculation method proposed by Lei Zhou, et\n al (2013) including thirteen formulas to calculate the different attributes\n of the layout of interface. This paper selects six attributes to study\n interface elements aesthetic, such as balance, symmetry, integrity and so\n on, and conducting an experiment to verify the calculated results with the\n participants subjective evaluation results. In this study, eight different\n web pages were selected to evaluate the layout of interface elements,\n including four cultural and educational web pages and four shopping web\n pages, which can roughly represent the mainstream web design of these two\n types of web pages. First of all, the layout of selected interface elements\n was calculated by Matlab\n software(https://ww2.mathworks.cn/en/products/matlab.html?s_tid=hp_products_matlab).\n In the second step, Likert seven-point scale test was used to let the\n subjects score the beauty degree of each page. And finally, the two groups\n of data were compared to draw a conclusion. According to subject's\n evaluation, southeast university library homepage layout got the highest\n score of 5.5 points. Compared with the calculation results of beauty, it is\n consistent with the calculation results, and has achieved high scores in the\n calculation of attributes in balance, integrity, cohesion and proportion\n beauty. This shows that for the layout of the subjective evaluation and the\n degree of the calculation results are largely consistent with, the\n scientific and accuracy of the beauty degree calculation is highly can help\n the designers to improve interface configuration and design layout.","PeriodicalId":269162,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Human Systems Integration (IHSI 2023) Integrating People and Intelligent Systems, February 22–24, 2023, Venice, Italy","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Human Systems Integration (IHSI 2023) Integrating People and Intelligent Systems, February 22–24, 2023, Venice, Italy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on the beauty degree calculation method proposed by Lei Zhou, et al (2013) including thirteen formulas to calculate the different attributes of the layout of interface. This paper selects six attributes to study interface elements aesthetic, such as balance, symmetry, integrity and so on, and conducting an experiment to verify the calculated results with the participants subjective evaluation results. In this study, eight different web pages were selected to evaluate the layout of interface elements, including four cultural and educational web pages and four shopping web pages, which can roughly represent the mainstream web design of these two types of web pages. First of all, the layout of selected interface elements was calculated by Matlab software(https://ww2.mathworks.cn/en/products/matlab.html?s_tid=hp_products_matlab). In the second step, Likert seven-point scale test was used to let the subjects score the beauty degree of each page. And finally, the two groups of data were compared to draw a conclusion. According to subject's evaluation, southeast university library homepage layout got the highest score of 5.5 points. Compared with the calculation results of beauty, it is consistent with the calculation results, and has achieved high scores in the calculation of attributes in balance, integrity, cohesion and proportion beauty. This shows that for the layout of the subjective evaluation and the degree of the calculation results are largely consistent with, the scientific and accuracy of the beauty degree calculation is highly can help the designers to improve interface configuration and design layout.
基于美观度计算的两类不同用途网页界面元素布局对比研究
基于周磊等(2013)提出的包含13个公式的美观度计算方法,计算界面布局的不同属性。本文选取平衡性、对称性、完整性等6个属性来研究界面元素美学,并通过实验与参与者的主观评价结果验证计算结果。本研究选取了8个不同的网页来评估界面元素的布局,包括4个文化教育类网页和4个购物类网页,大致可以代表这两类网页的主流网页设计。首先,通过Matlab软件(https://ww2.mathworks.cn/en/products/matlab.html?s_tid=hp_products_matlab)计算所选界面元素的布局。第二步采用李克特七分制测试,让被试对每一页的美观程度进行评分。最后,对比两组数据得出结论。根据学科评价,东南大学图书馆主页布局获得了5.5分的最高分。与美感的计算结果相比,与计算结果一致,在平衡、完整性、凝聚力和比例美感的属性计算中取得了高分。这说明对于布局的主观评价与度计算结果在很大程度上是一致的,美观度计算的科学性和准确性很高,可以帮助设计者改进界面配置和设计布局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信