Efficient SDN Controller for Safety Applications in SDN-Based Vehicular Networks: POX, Floodlight, ONOS or OpenDaylight?

K. Smida, H. Tounsi, M. Frikha, Yeqiong Song
{"title":"Efficient SDN Controller for Safety Applications in SDN-Based Vehicular Networks: POX, Floodlight, ONOS or OpenDaylight?","authors":"K. Smida, H. Tounsi, M. Frikha, Yeqiong Song","doi":"10.1109/ComNet47917.2020.9306095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thanks to its open programmability and logically centralized control, the software-defined networking (SDN) paradigm presents new potentials for communication and networking management in vehicular networks and promises improved performances. The variety of applications delivered on the road like safety, traffic efficiency and infotainment, in addition to the diversity of developed SDN controllers, triggered the challenge to determine which controller can act better in which service. In this paper we conduct a performance comparison of four open source controllers (POX, Floodlight, ONOS and OpenDaylight) in terms of e2e delay in the context of safety applications in variable vehicular density environment. Experimental study done with advanced tools such as Iperf and Mininet-wifi indicates that ODL is the best in this context.","PeriodicalId":351664,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Communications and Networking (ComNet)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Communications and Networking (ComNet)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ComNet47917.2020.9306095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Thanks to its open programmability and logically centralized control, the software-defined networking (SDN) paradigm presents new potentials for communication and networking management in vehicular networks and promises improved performances. The variety of applications delivered on the road like safety, traffic efficiency and infotainment, in addition to the diversity of developed SDN controllers, triggered the challenge to determine which controller can act better in which service. In this paper we conduct a performance comparison of four open source controllers (POX, Floodlight, ONOS and OpenDaylight) in terms of e2e delay in the context of safety applications in variable vehicular density environment. Experimental study done with advanced tools such as Iperf and Mininet-wifi indicates that ODL is the best in this context.
基于SDN的车载网络安全应用的高效SDN控制器:POX、泛光灯、ONOS还是OpenDaylight?
由于其开放的可编程性和逻辑上的集中控制,软件定义网络(SDN)范式为车载网络的通信和网络管理提供了新的潜力,并承诺提高性能。道路上提供的各种应用,如安全、交通效率和信息娱乐,以及开发的SDN控制器的多样性,引发了确定哪种控制器在哪种服务中表现更好的挑战。在本文中,我们对四种开源控制器(POX, Floodlight, ONOS和OpenDaylight)在可变车辆密度环境中安全应用的端到端延迟方面进行了性能比较。使用Iperf和mini -wifi等先进工具进行的实验研究表明,在这种情况下,ODL是最好的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信