Conceptualising Post-Transition Disappearances

L. Payne, Karina Ansolabehere
{"title":"Conceptualising Post-Transition Disappearances","authors":"L. Payne, Karina Ansolabehere","doi":"10.5871/bacad/9780197267226.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter establishes a holistic approach to understanding disappearances in post-transition countries. It considers the historical repertoires of disappearance that emerge during periods of authoritarian rule and armed conflict. It further argues that four logics behind disappearances in those situations continue into the post-transition. These include the clandestine logic, or hiding crimes against humanity from domestic and international scrutiny. Those disappearances also tend to involve marginalised populations; a ‘disposable people’ logic creates framing devices that transform citizens into those without rights or visibility. A political-economy logic emerges with cheap and exploitable workers, who are disappeared when their labour utility is exhausted; those with economic and political power commit these atrocities with impunity. The logic of ambiguous loss becomes a form of social control. Grieving processes are blocked when relatives lack certainty that the person is gone. They further lack the necessary evidence of death and wrongdoing to pursue redress. These four logics together, the project contends, explain why disappearances previously studied only in authoritarian or armed conflict contexts prevail also in the post-transition.","PeriodicalId":423029,"journal":{"name":"Disappearances in the Post-Transition Era in Latin America","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disappearances in the Post-Transition Era in Latin America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197267226.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This chapter establishes a holistic approach to understanding disappearances in post-transition countries. It considers the historical repertoires of disappearance that emerge during periods of authoritarian rule and armed conflict. It further argues that four logics behind disappearances in those situations continue into the post-transition. These include the clandestine logic, or hiding crimes against humanity from domestic and international scrutiny. Those disappearances also tend to involve marginalised populations; a ‘disposable people’ logic creates framing devices that transform citizens into those without rights or visibility. A political-economy logic emerges with cheap and exploitable workers, who are disappeared when their labour utility is exhausted; those with economic and political power commit these atrocities with impunity. The logic of ambiguous loss becomes a form of social control. Grieving processes are blocked when relatives lack certainty that the person is gone. They further lack the necessary evidence of death and wrongdoing to pursue redress. These four logics together, the project contends, explain why disappearances previously studied only in authoritarian or armed conflict contexts prevail also in the post-transition.
转型后失踪的概念化
本章建立了一种理解转型后国家失踪的整体方法。它考虑了在独裁统治和武装冲突时期出现的历史上常见的失踪事件。它还认为,在这些情况下失踪背后的四个逻辑一直延续到过渡后。其中包括秘密逻辑,或隐藏危害人类罪,不受国内和国际监督。这些失踪事件也往往涉及边缘人群;“可抛弃的人”的逻辑创造了一种框架装置,把公民变成了没有权利或能见度的人。一种政治经济逻辑出现在廉价和可剥削的工人身上,当他们的劳动效用耗尽时,他们就消失了;那些拥有经济和政治权力的人犯下这些暴行却不受惩罚。模糊损失的逻辑成为一种社会控制的形式。当亲属不确定死者是否已经离开时,悲伤的过程就会受阻。他们还缺乏必要的死亡和不法行为证据,无法寻求补救。该项目认为,这四种逻辑合在一起,解释了为什么以前只在专制或武装冲突背景下研究的失踪现象在过渡后也普遍存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信