Wat bezielt afvalligen?

Leonard Van 't Hul
{"title":"Wat bezielt afvalligen?","authors":"Leonard Van 't Hul","doi":"10.54195/rs.11781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social scientists have come up with contrasting ideas on how to interpret indi­vidual transitions toward post­-Christian identities in contemporary Western societies. From the 1990s onward there has been a growing scientific interest in transitions towards holistic spiritualities, a trend that was complemented by an increasing emphasis on secular identities such as atheism after the turn of the millennium. A review of this growing stock of academic literature shows that the theoretical explanations of the various diagnoses are remarkably the same, empha­sizing a rationalization and pluralization of (religious) meaning systems, and a growth of moral individualism. Although these notions are undeniably true, they hardly enable a differentiation between individual transitions to the comple­menting post-­Christian identities. In this article I delve into this ‘explanatory gap’ by comparatively reconstructing the trajectories of post­-Christian identity reshap­ing, while focusing on the transition to atheist disbelief and holistic spiritualities. From a series of life course interviews it appears that the strictness of one’s religious milieu is a paramount factor in the process toward apostasy and embracing a new religious or secular identity later in life.","PeriodicalId":286339,"journal":{"name":"Religie & Samenleving","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religie & Samenleving","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54195/rs.11781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social scientists have come up with contrasting ideas on how to interpret indi­vidual transitions toward post­-Christian identities in contemporary Western societies. From the 1990s onward there has been a growing scientific interest in transitions towards holistic spiritualities, a trend that was complemented by an increasing emphasis on secular identities such as atheism after the turn of the millennium. A review of this growing stock of academic literature shows that the theoretical explanations of the various diagnoses are remarkably the same, empha­sizing a rationalization and pluralization of (religious) meaning systems, and a growth of moral individualism. Although these notions are undeniably true, they hardly enable a differentiation between individual transitions to the comple­menting post-­Christian identities. In this article I delve into this ‘explanatory gap’ by comparatively reconstructing the trajectories of post­-Christian identity reshap­ing, while focusing on the transition to atheist disbelief and holistic spiritualities. From a series of life course interviews it appears that the strictness of one’s religious milieu is a paramount factor in the process toward apostasy and embracing a new religious or secular identity later in life.
是什么驱使着叛教者?
关于如何解释当代西方社会中个人向后基督教身份的转变,社会科学家们提出了截然不同的观点。从20世纪90年代开始,科学界对整体灵性的转变越来越感兴趣,这一趋势与世纪之交后对无神论等世俗身份的日益强调相补充。对不断增长的学术文献的回顾表明,对各种诊断的理论解释非常相同,强调(宗教)意义系统的合理化和多元化,以及道德个人主义的增长。尽管这些观念无可否认是正确的,但它们很难区分个体向补充后基督教身份的过渡。在这篇文章中,我通过比较重建后基督教身份重塑的轨迹来深入研究这种“解释差距”,同时关注向无神论的不信和整体精神的过渡。从一系列的人生历程采访中可以看出,一个人的宗教环境的严格程度是在后来的生活中走向叛教和接受新的宗教或世俗身份的过程中最重要的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信