Block Me If You Can: A Large-Scale Study of Tracker-Blocking Tools

Georg Merzdovnik, Markus Huber, D. Buhov, Nick Nikiforakis, S. Neuner, Martin Schmiedecker, E. Weippl
{"title":"Block Me If You Can: A Large-Scale Study of Tracker-Blocking Tools","authors":"Georg Merzdovnik, Markus Huber, D. Buhov, Nick Nikiforakis, S. Neuner, Martin Schmiedecker, E. Weippl","doi":"10.1109/EuroSP.2017.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we quantify the effectiveness of third-party tracker blockers on a large scale. First, we analyze the architecture of various state-of-the-art blocking solutions and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Second, we perform a two-part measurement study on the effectiveness of popular tracker-blocking tools. Our analysis quantifies the protection offered against trackers present on more than 100,000 popular websites and 10,000 popular Android applications. We provide novel insights into the ongoing arms race between trackers and developers of blocking tools as well as which tools achieve the best results under what circumstances. Among others, we discover that rule-based browser extensions outperform learning-based ones, trackers with smaller footprints are more successful at avoiding being blocked, and CDNs pose a major threat towards the future of tracker-blocking tools. Overall, the contributions of this paper advance the field of web privacy by providing not only the largest study to date on the effectiveness of tracker-blocking tools, but also by highlighting the most pressing challenges and privacy issues of third-party tracking.","PeriodicalId":233564,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P)","volume":"176 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"127","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EuroSP.2017.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 127

Abstract

In this paper, we quantify the effectiveness of third-party tracker blockers on a large scale. First, we analyze the architecture of various state-of-the-art blocking solutions and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Second, we perform a two-part measurement study on the effectiveness of popular tracker-blocking tools. Our analysis quantifies the protection offered against trackers present on more than 100,000 popular websites and 10,000 popular Android applications. We provide novel insights into the ongoing arms race between trackers and developers of blocking tools as well as which tools achieve the best results under what circumstances. Among others, we discover that rule-based browser extensions outperform learning-based ones, trackers with smaller footprints are more successful at avoiding being blocked, and CDNs pose a major threat towards the future of tracker-blocking tools. Overall, the contributions of this paper advance the field of web privacy by providing not only the largest study to date on the effectiveness of tracker-blocking tools, but also by highlighting the most pressing challenges and privacy issues of third-party tracking.
如果你能阻止我:追踪器阻止工具的大规模研究
在本文中,我们大规模量化了第三方跟踪拦截器的有效性。首先,我们分析了各种最先进的阻塞解决方案的架构,并讨论了每种方法的优缺点。其次,我们对流行的跟踪器拦截工具的有效性进行了两部分的测量研究。我们的分析量化了针对超过10万个流行网站和1万个流行Android应用程序的跟踪器提供的保护。我们对拦截工具的追踪者和开发人员之间正在进行的军备竞赛,以及哪些工具在什么情况下达到最佳效果,提供了新颖的见解。其中,我们发现基于规则的浏览器扩展优于基于学习的浏览器扩展,足迹较小的跟踪器在避免被阻止方面更成功,而cdn对跟踪器阻止工具的未来构成了主要威胁。总体而言,本文的贡献不仅提供了迄今为止对跟踪器屏蔽工具有效性的最大研究,而且还强调了第三方跟踪最紧迫的挑战和隐私问题,从而推动了网络隐私领域的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信