The doctor-patient relationship in telemedicine and mobile health

G. Vergallo, S. Zaami, A. D. Luca, N. M. D. Luca, M. Bizzarri, E. Marinelli
{"title":"The doctor-patient relationship in telemedicine and mobile health","authors":"G. Vergallo, S. Zaami, A. D. Luca, N. M. D. Luca, M. Bizzarri, E. Marinelli","doi":"10.14616/SANDS-2017-1-331337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Telemedicine falls under the broader term of eHealth and involves the delivery of health care services, where distance is a criticalfactor. Thanks to telemedicine patients can access treatments that would otherwise be unavailable.The authors focus on whether doctor-patient relationship exist in telemedicine and mobile health. The answer should be found on acase-by-case basis. There is a doctor-patient relationship when the two are connected, possibly electronically, for purposes related tothe prevention, diagnosis or treatment of diseases. But the doctor-patient relationship is absent when the patient downloads apps toself diagnose rather than seeing a doctor. These apps encourage the use of ‘DIY’ medicine, making the doctor superfluous and canoften lead to misdiagnosis and misunderstanding.Informed consent to the use of telemedicine should have the same prerequisites as those used in traditional medical practice.However, telemedicine requires some additional information: risks related to the privacy of personal data and precautionarymeasures to reduce them; further risks involved in the use of technology (for example, quality and efficiency of the telematic tools).With regards to the processing of personal data in mobile health, informed consent should be even more specific than that formedical treatment via telemedicine. In order to respect the requirement of specificity, the app should be structured in a way thatallows the user to express consent for each type of data that the app intends to collect. But such a solution presents various difficulties.In conclusion, direct contact between a doctor and their patient should continue to be the preferred practice with which to carry outthe relationship. Telemedicine can be used when it is deemed to be in the best interest of the patient, for example when it can offerthe possibility of surgical treatment otherwise unavailable, or where contact is not possible.","PeriodicalId":374697,"journal":{"name":"Senses and Sciences","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Senses and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14616/SANDS-2017-1-331337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Telemedicine falls under the broader term of eHealth and involves the delivery of health care services, where distance is a criticalfactor. Thanks to telemedicine patients can access treatments that would otherwise be unavailable.The authors focus on whether doctor-patient relationship exist in telemedicine and mobile health. The answer should be found on acase-by-case basis. There is a doctor-patient relationship when the two are connected, possibly electronically, for purposes related tothe prevention, diagnosis or treatment of diseases. But the doctor-patient relationship is absent when the patient downloads apps toself diagnose rather than seeing a doctor. These apps encourage the use of ‘DIY’ medicine, making the doctor superfluous and canoften lead to misdiagnosis and misunderstanding.Informed consent to the use of telemedicine should have the same prerequisites as those used in traditional medical practice.However, telemedicine requires some additional information: risks related to the privacy of personal data and precautionarymeasures to reduce them; further risks involved in the use of technology (for example, quality and efficiency of the telematic tools).With regards to the processing of personal data in mobile health, informed consent should be even more specific than that formedical treatment via telemedicine. In order to respect the requirement of specificity, the app should be structured in a way thatallows the user to express consent for each type of data that the app intends to collect. But such a solution presents various difficulties.In conclusion, direct contact between a doctor and their patient should continue to be the preferred practice with which to carry outthe relationship. Telemedicine can be used when it is deemed to be in the best interest of the patient, for example when it can offerthe possibility of surgical treatment otherwise unavailable, or where contact is not possible.
远程医疗和移动医疗中的医患关系
远程医疗属于更广泛的电子保健术语,涉及提供医疗保健服务,其中距离是一个关键因素。由于远程医疗,患者可以获得原本无法获得的治疗。探讨了远程医疗和移动医疗中是否存在医患关系。答案应该根据具体情况而定。当两者为了预防、诊断或治疗疾病而可能以电子方式连接起来时,就存在医患关系。但当患者自己下载应用程序而不是去看医生时,医患关系就不存在了。这些应用程序鼓励使用“DIY”药物,使医生变得多余,并经常导致误诊和误解。对使用远程医疗的知情同意应具有与传统医疗实践中使用的相同的先决条件。然而,远程医疗需要一些额外的信息:与个人数据隐私相关的风险以及减少这些风险的预防措施;涉及技术使用的进一步风险(例如,远程信息处理工具的质量和效率)。关于在移动医疗中处理个人数据,知情同意应比通过远程医疗进行医疗更具体。为了尊重特殊性的要求,应用程序的结构应该允许用户对应用程序打算收集的每种类型的数据表示同意。但这样的解决方案存在各种困难。总之,医生和病人之间的直接接触应该继续是实现这种关系的首选做法。当远程医疗被认为符合患者的最佳利益时,例如,当它可以提供手术治疗的可能性时,或者在不可能联系的情况下,可以使用远程医疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信