Mirror of Lear: A Comparative Study of The Fool in King Lear and The Gravedigger’s Boy in Lear

Yang Honghui
{"title":"Mirror of Lear: A Comparative Study of The Fool in King Lear and The Gravedigger’s Boy in Lear","authors":"Yang Honghui","doi":"10.21013/jems.v18.n4.p4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adaptations of Shakespeare’s King Lear have always been extensively explored, especially Edward Bond’s Lear. Many researchers about Lear focus on its rewriting of the political and social themes, however, they seldom of them paid attention to the small roles in the two works. Although scholars such as Michael Patterson once mentioned Bond’s rewriting of Shakespeare’s original characters, they focused on the lack of perfect characters such as Cordelia and did not make a detailed comparative study of small roles such as the Fool in King Lear and gravedigger’s boy in Lear. This paper aims to analyze small roles in the two dramas, especially the fool in Shakespeare’s King Lear and the Gravedigger’s Boy in Bond’s Lear, and explore Bond’s rewriting of Shakespeare’s image of these two small roles.","PeriodicalId":266719,"journal":{"name":"IRA International Journal of Education and Multidisciplinary Studies","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRA International Journal of Education and Multidisciplinary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21013/jems.v18.n4.p4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adaptations of Shakespeare’s King Lear have always been extensively explored, especially Edward Bond’s Lear. Many researchers about Lear focus on its rewriting of the political and social themes, however, they seldom of them paid attention to the small roles in the two works. Although scholars such as Michael Patterson once mentioned Bond’s rewriting of Shakespeare’s original characters, they focused on the lack of perfect characters such as Cordelia and did not make a detailed comparative study of small roles such as the Fool in King Lear and gravedigger’s boy in Lear. This paper aims to analyze small roles in the two dramas, especially the fool in Shakespeare’s King Lear and the Gravedigger’s Boy in Bond’s Lear, and explore Bond’s rewriting of Shakespeare’s image of these two small roles.
李尔王之镜:《李尔王》中的傻瓜与《李尔王》中掘墓人的男孩的比较研究
莎士比亚的《李尔王》一直被广泛地改编,尤其是爱德华·邦德的《李尔王》。许多研究《李尔王》的学者关注的是其对政治和社会主题的改写,而很少关注两部作品中的小角色。虽然Michael Patterson等学者曾提到邦德对莎士比亚原著人物的改写,但他们关注的是缺少像Cordelia这样的完美人物,并没有对《李尔王》中的傻瓜和《李尔王》中掘墓人的男孩这样的小角色进行详细的比较研究。本文旨在分析两部戏剧中的小角色,尤其是莎士比亚《李尔王》中的傻瓜和邦德《李尔王》中掘墓人的男孩,并探讨邦德对莎士比亚对这两个小角色形象的改写。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信