STRENGTHENING THE PRESENCE OF SUBJECTIVE JOURNALISTIC VOICE IN THE NEWS AS A TREND OF THE DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT

Olga I. Agnistikova
{"title":"STRENGTHENING THE PRESENCE OF SUBJECTIVE JOURNALISTIC VOICE IN THE NEWS AS A TREND OF THE DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT","authors":"Olga I. Agnistikova","doi":"10.34216/1998-0817-2022-28-4-86-92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conventions traditionally attributed to journalism are increasingly challenged by theorists and practitioners of the media environment in modern conditions, which actualises the problem of the sustainability of the profession's normative core. The threat of the diminution of the ideals of objectivity and neutrality raises the need to study the possible strengthening of the journalistic voice as a trend that is gaining ground in the era of digital and social media. On the example of BuzzFeed News, Life, Regnum, UnCos|News, NeKhabar, Tengrinews, the degree of expression of the indicators of subjective journalistic voice in political news in crisis and non-crisis periods is determined. The results are compared with the intensity of the manifestation of the author's voice in the news texts created in line with the traditional media logic. The interconnections between the strength of the journalistic voice and the critical content of the publications are outlined. The author reveals the expansion of journalistic presence in the news, achieved by moving beyond the mode of strategic depersonalisation. The conclusion is made about the observed deviation in the digital environment from the practices of following an objective reporter's voice.","PeriodicalId":326235,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Kostroma State University","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Kostroma State University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2022-28-4-86-92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The conventions traditionally attributed to journalism are increasingly challenged by theorists and practitioners of the media environment in modern conditions, which actualises the problem of the sustainability of the profession's normative core. The threat of the diminution of the ideals of objectivity and neutrality raises the need to study the possible strengthening of the journalistic voice as a trend that is gaining ground in the era of digital and social media. On the example of BuzzFeed News, Life, Regnum, UnCos|News, NeKhabar, Tengrinews, the degree of expression of the indicators of subjective journalistic voice in political news in crisis and non-crisis periods is determined. The results are compared with the intensity of the manifestation of the author's voice in the news texts created in line with the traditional media logic. The interconnections between the strength of the journalistic voice and the critical content of the publications are outlined. The author reveals the expansion of journalistic presence in the news, achieved by moving beyond the mode of strategic depersonalisation. The conclusion is made about the observed deviation in the digital environment from the practices of following an objective reporter's voice.
加强新闻主体话语权是数字环境下的趋势
传统上归因于新闻的惯例日益受到现代条件下媒体环境的理论家和实践者的挑战,这实现了该职业规范核心的可持续性问题。客观和中立理想受到削弱的威胁,促使我们有必要研究加强新闻话语权的可能性,这是在数字和社交媒体时代取得进展的一种趋势。以BuzzFeed News、Life、Regnum、UnCos|News、NeKhabar、Tengrinews为例,确定危机时期和非危机时期时政新闻主观新闻声音指标的表达程度。将结果与符合传统媒体逻辑的新闻文本中作者声音的表现强度进行比较。概述了新闻声音的力量与出版物的关键内容之间的相互联系。作者揭示了新闻存在的扩张,通过超越战略去人格化的模式来实现。结论是关于在数字环境中观察到的偏离跟踪客观记者声音的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信