Energy access and household risk transitions in South Africa

D. Kimemia, H. Annegarn
{"title":"Energy access and household risk transitions in South Africa","authors":"D. Kimemia, H. Annegarn","doi":"10.1109/DUE.2014.6827757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the commendable success in household electrification, energy poverty is still a challenge in South Africa [1], with many residents of low-income settlements unable either to afford or to access modern energy carriers. Energy related accidents such as shack fires and paraffin poisonings are a common phenomenon amongst poor communities, resulting in health and economic losses. This paper reports on two research projects that studied environmental risk transitions vis-à-vis energy poverty and the progress made in promoting modern energy access in South Africa. In the first project, the premise that energy poverty is a major determinant of energy incidents is tested with nationally representative household energy consumption surveys and hospital treatment data through quantitative analysis. The second project evaluated the impacts of an LPG intervention programme as a proxy for progress in modern energy access. Results indicate a positive non-linear relationship between poverty on one hand and the risk of injury from household energy use. The apparent household risk is generally much larger amongst nonelectrified households, especially those using a combination of paraffin and candles. Results show that access to LPG reduces energy expenditure and improves overall wellbeing of households. Policy interventions arising from these findings include a need for promotion of programmes that raise awareness of domestic energy safety issues within vulnerable communities, and national energy interventions to substitute paraffin with cleaner safer modern fuels.","PeriodicalId":112427,"journal":{"name":"Twenty-Second Domestic Use of Energy","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twenty-Second Domestic Use of Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DUE.2014.6827757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Despite the commendable success in household electrification, energy poverty is still a challenge in South Africa [1], with many residents of low-income settlements unable either to afford or to access modern energy carriers. Energy related accidents such as shack fires and paraffin poisonings are a common phenomenon amongst poor communities, resulting in health and economic losses. This paper reports on two research projects that studied environmental risk transitions vis-à-vis energy poverty and the progress made in promoting modern energy access in South Africa. In the first project, the premise that energy poverty is a major determinant of energy incidents is tested with nationally representative household energy consumption surveys and hospital treatment data through quantitative analysis. The second project evaluated the impacts of an LPG intervention programme as a proxy for progress in modern energy access. Results indicate a positive non-linear relationship between poverty on one hand and the risk of injury from household energy use. The apparent household risk is generally much larger amongst nonelectrified households, especially those using a combination of paraffin and candles. Results show that access to LPG reduces energy expenditure and improves overall wellbeing of households. Policy interventions arising from these findings include a need for promotion of programmes that raise awareness of domestic energy safety issues within vulnerable communities, and national energy interventions to substitute paraffin with cleaner safer modern fuels.
南非的能源获取和家庭风险转变
尽管南非在家庭电气化方面取得了值得称赞的成功,但能源贫困仍然是南非面临的一个挑战[1],许多低收入定居点的居民既负担不起也无法使用现代能源载体。与能源有关的事故,如棚屋火灾和石蜡中毒,是贫穷社区的普遍现象,造成健康和经济损失。本文报告了两个研究项目,研究了-à-vis能源贫困的环境风险转变和南非在促进现代能源获取方面取得的进展。在第一个项目中,通过定量分析,利用具有全国代表性的家庭能源消费调查和医院治疗数据,对能源贫困是能源事件的主要决定因素这一前提进行了检验。第二个项目评估了液化石油气干预方案的影响,将其作为现代能源获取进展的代表。结果表明,一方面,贫困与家庭能源使用造成的伤害风险之间存在正非线性关系。在没有通电的家庭中,这种明显的家庭风险通常要大得多,尤其是那些同时使用石蜡和蜡烛的家庭。结果表明,使用液化石油气减少了能源消耗,改善了家庭的整体福祉。从这些调查结果中产生的政策干预措施包括需要促进提高脆弱社区对国内能源安全问题认识的方案,以及国家能源干预措施,以更清洁、更安全的现代燃料替代石蜡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信