EVALUATION OF CURRENT PRACTICE OF STRESS ULCER PROPHYLAXIS IN PATIENTS ADMITTED TO INTENSIVE CARE UNITS IN THE GAZA STRIP- PALESTINE

Hala Alagha, Nasaem Mohammed Al Mabhouh
{"title":"EVALUATION OF CURRENT PRACTICE OF STRESS ULCER PROPHYLAXIS IN PATIENTS ADMITTED TO INTENSIVE CARE UNITS IN THE GAZA STRIP- PALESTINE","authors":"Hala Alagha, Nasaem Mohammed Al Mabhouh","doi":"10.21608/bfsa.2022.271660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed at assessing the degree of adherence of Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) practice to the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) guidelines in intensive care units (ICUs) at three hospitals in the Gaza Strip, Palestine. This was a prospective study that utilized chart review methodology for data collection. Four aspects of SUP practice were assessed: indication, dose, route of administration and duration. The study enrolled 442 ICU patients with a median (Interquartile range, IQR) age of 49.0 (36.6) years. More than half the patients (55.7%) were males. Coagulopathy was the most common major risk factor for stress ulcer, presented in 73 (16.5%) patients, while the use of corticosteroid therapy was the most common minor risk factor presented in 93 (21%) patients. SUP was administered to 426 (96.4%) patients, of which 86.9% received ranitidine and 13.1% received PPIs. Overall adherence and indication adherence rates to guidelines were 16.7% and 36.4%, respectively. Appropriate dose, route and duration of SUP were found in 63.6%, 68.2%, and 88.1% of the evaluated doses, respectively. Of the 426 patients prescribed SUP, 48 (11.3%) developed adverse effects. This study revealed suboptimal SUP practice in the investigated hospitals and the need to apply strategies to improve SUP use patterns.","PeriodicalId":345040,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Pharmaceutical Sciences. Assiut","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Pharmaceutical Sciences. Assiut","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/bfsa.2022.271660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed at assessing the degree of adherence of Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) practice to the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) guidelines in intensive care units (ICUs) at three hospitals in the Gaza Strip, Palestine. This was a prospective study that utilized chart review methodology for data collection. Four aspects of SUP practice were assessed: indication, dose, route of administration and duration. The study enrolled 442 ICU patients with a median (Interquartile range, IQR) age of 49.0 (36.6) years. More than half the patients (55.7%) were males. Coagulopathy was the most common major risk factor for stress ulcer, presented in 73 (16.5%) patients, while the use of corticosteroid therapy was the most common minor risk factor presented in 93 (21%) patients. SUP was administered to 426 (96.4%) patients, of which 86.9% received ranitidine and 13.1% received PPIs. Overall adherence and indication adherence rates to guidelines were 16.7% and 36.4%, respectively. Appropriate dose, route and duration of SUP were found in 63.6%, 68.2%, and 88.1% of the evaluated doses, respectively. Of the 426 patients prescribed SUP, 48 (11.3%) developed adverse effects. This study revealed suboptimal SUP practice in the investigated hospitals and the need to apply strategies to improve SUP use patterns.
评估加沙地带-巴勒斯坦重症监护病房收治的病人目前预防应激性溃疡的做法
本研究旨在评估巴勒斯坦加沙地带三家医院重症监护病房(icu)的应激性溃疡预防(SUP)实践对美国卫生系统药剂师协会(ASHP)指南的遵守程度。这是一项前瞻性研究,采用图表回顾方法收集数据。评估SUP实践的四个方面:适应证、剂量、给药途径和持续时间。该研究纳入了442例ICU患者,中位年龄(四分位间距,IQR)为49.0(36.6)岁。超过半数(55.7%)患者为男性。凝血功能障碍是应激性溃疡最常见的主要危险因素,出现在73例(16.5%)患者中,而使用皮质类固醇治疗是93例(21%)患者中最常见的次要危险因素。426例(96.4%)患者接受SUP治疗,其中86.9%接受雷尼替丁治疗,13.1%接受PPIs治疗。总体依存率和适应症依存率分别为16.7%和36.4%。分别有63.6%、68.2%和88.1%的评估剂量发现合适的SUP剂量、途径和持续时间。在426例接受SUP治疗的患者中,48例(11.3%)出现不良反应。本研究揭示了被调查医院的次优SUP实践和需要应用策略来改善SUP使用模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信