{"title":"EVALUATION OF CURRENT PRACTICE OF STRESS ULCER PROPHYLAXIS IN PATIENTS ADMITTED TO INTENSIVE CARE UNITS IN THE GAZA STRIP- PALESTINE","authors":"Hala Alagha, Nasaem Mohammed Al Mabhouh","doi":"10.21608/bfsa.2022.271660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed at assessing the degree of adherence of Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) practice to the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) guidelines in intensive care units (ICUs) at three hospitals in the Gaza Strip, Palestine. This was a prospective study that utilized chart review methodology for data collection. Four aspects of SUP practice were assessed: indication, dose, route of administration and duration. The study enrolled 442 ICU patients with a median (Interquartile range, IQR) age of 49.0 (36.6) years. More than half the patients (55.7%) were males. Coagulopathy was the most common major risk factor for stress ulcer, presented in 73 (16.5%) patients, while the use of corticosteroid therapy was the most common minor risk factor presented in 93 (21%) patients. SUP was administered to 426 (96.4%) patients, of which 86.9% received ranitidine and 13.1% received PPIs. Overall adherence and indication adherence rates to guidelines were 16.7% and 36.4%, respectively. Appropriate dose, route and duration of SUP were found in 63.6%, 68.2%, and 88.1% of the evaluated doses, respectively. Of the 426 patients prescribed SUP, 48 (11.3%) developed adverse effects. This study revealed suboptimal SUP practice in the investigated hospitals and the need to apply strategies to improve SUP use patterns.","PeriodicalId":345040,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Pharmaceutical Sciences. Assiut","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Pharmaceutical Sciences. Assiut","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/bfsa.2022.271660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed at assessing the degree of adherence of Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) practice to the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) guidelines in intensive care units (ICUs) at three hospitals in the Gaza Strip, Palestine. This was a prospective study that utilized chart review methodology for data collection. Four aspects of SUP practice were assessed: indication, dose, route of administration and duration. The study enrolled 442 ICU patients with a median (Interquartile range, IQR) age of 49.0 (36.6) years. More than half the patients (55.7%) were males. Coagulopathy was the most common major risk factor for stress ulcer, presented in 73 (16.5%) patients, while the use of corticosteroid therapy was the most common minor risk factor presented in 93 (21%) patients. SUP was administered to 426 (96.4%) patients, of which 86.9% received ranitidine and 13.1% received PPIs. Overall adherence and indication adherence rates to guidelines were 16.7% and 36.4%, respectively. Appropriate dose, route and duration of SUP were found in 63.6%, 68.2%, and 88.1% of the evaluated doses, respectively. Of the 426 patients prescribed SUP, 48 (11.3%) developed adverse effects. This study revealed suboptimal SUP practice in the investigated hospitals and the need to apply strategies to improve SUP use patterns.