Agricultural Productivity, Inter-Sectoral Labor Shift, and Economic Growth in India

S. Balaji, S. Babu
{"title":"Agricultural Productivity, Inter-Sectoral Labor Shift, and Economic Growth in India","authors":"S. Balaji, S. Babu","doi":"10.2499/p15738coll2.133787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we study the transformation process Indian agriculture exhibited in the recent past, studying its policy implications. Between the years 2005-06 and 2015-16, more than 52 million workers left agriculture, which did not have any effect on agricultural output due to productivity improvements. We estimate the contribution of productivity growth and structural change in agriculture to national productivity growth during 1981-2016. We estimate differentials in agricultural productivity and in their ability to contribute to the structural change process for 21 major states of India. Using revised employment estimates, we trace major changes during the pre-reforms (before 1991) and post-reforms periods. Results show that in the pre-reforms period, the impact of productivity improvements in agriculture on agricultural output was equated by the new workforce entering into this sector, leading to a stagnant labor productivity trend. The labor-shift from agriculture during the early years of the post-reforms period, which increased further in the next decade, has led to a consistent rise in agricultural productivity. In the absence of reforms and the associated labor shift, the productivity growth in Indian agriculture would have been much lower. A similar labor shift during the last decade has not affected agricultural output, which has risen more rapidly. This result holds true for almost all states studied. There exists a positive relation between labor-shift and agricultural output in a cluster of states. Decomposition results indicate ‘within-sector’ productivity growth is the major source of overall growth, with a rising contribution of ‘structural change’. Studying the sources of growth across states offers new scope to achieve inter-sectoral productivity convergence.","PeriodicalId":320822,"journal":{"name":"Development Economics: Agriculture","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Economics: Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.133787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we study the transformation process Indian agriculture exhibited in the recent past, studying its policy implications. Between the years 2005-06 and 2015-16, more than 52 million workers left agriculture, which did not have any effect on agricultural output due to productivity improvements. We estimate the contribution of productivity growth and structural change in agriculture to national productivity growth during 1981-2016. We estimate differentials in agricultural productivity and in their ability to contribute to the structural change process for 21 major states of India. Using revised employment estimates, we trace major changes during the pre-reforms (before 1991) and post-reforms periods. Results show that in the pre-reforms period, the impact of productivity improvements in agriculture on agricultural output was equated by the new workforce entering into this sector, leading to a stagnant labor productivity trend. The labor-shift from agriculture during the early years of the post-reforms period, which increased further in the next decade, has led to a consistent rise in agricultural productivity. In the absence of reforms and the associated labor shift, the productivity growth in Indian agriculture would have been much lower. A similar labor shift during the last decade has not affected agricultural output, which has risen more rapidly. This result holds true for almost all states studied. There exists a positive relation between labor-shift and agricultural output in a cluster of states. Decomposition results indicate ‘within-sector’ productivity growth is the major source of overall growth, with a rising contribution of ‘structural change’. Studying the sources of growth across states offers new scope to achieve inter-sectoral productivity convergence.
农业生产率、部门间劳动力转移与印度经济增长
本文研究了近年来印度农业的转型过程,并对其政策意义进行了研究。在2005-06年至2015-16年期间,超过5200万工人离开了农业,由于生产力的提高,这对农业产出没有任何影响。我们估算了1981-2016年期间农业生产率增长和结构变化对国家生产率增长的贡献。我们估计了印度21个主要邦的农业生产力差异及其对结构变化过程的贡献。利用修订后的就业估计,我们追踪了改革前(1991年之前)和改革后时期的主要变化。结果表明,在改革前,农业生产率提高对农业产出的影响与进入该部门的新劳动力相等,导致劳动生产率停滞不前的趋势。改革开放后的最初几年,农业劳动力的转移,在接下来的十年中进一步增加,导致了农业生产率的持续提高。如果没有改革和相关的劳动力转移,印度农业的生产率增长将会低得多。过去十年类似的劳动力转移并没有影响农业产出,农业产出增长得更快。这一结果几乎适用于所有被研究的州。在一些州,劳动力转移与农业产出之间存在正相关关系。分解结果表明,部门内生产率增长是整体增长的主要来源,而结构变化的贡献越来越大。研究各州的增长来源,为实现部门间生产率趋同提供了新的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信