The Environmental Sustainability of Measurements: A Practical Case-study With The Wheatstone bridge

L. Angrisani, P. Arpaia, M. D’Arco, E. D. Benedetto, Antonio Esposito, Monica Imbò
{"title":"The Environmental Sustainability of Measurements: A Practical Case-study With The Wheatstone bridge","authors":"L. Angrisani, P. Arpaia, M. D’Arco, E. D. Benedetto, Antonio Esposito, Monica Imbò","doi":"10.1109/RTSI55261.2022.9905201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sustainability is becoming one of the most important topics in almost all contexts. Because of climate change, it is imperative to be aware of the environmental impact of our actions, and so to re-evaluate the way processes are performed, including in the measurement domain. This paper discusses for the first time the environmental impact of a measurement. The analysis was carried on in the framework of recommendations by the International Telecommunication Union, which particularize ISO standards on life cycle assessment and carbon footprint to the Information and Communication Technology field. The carbon footprint was estimated for each element of a measurement by considering hardware, software, working environment, and operator-related footprint. Data were retrieved from previous literature or from public sustainability reports. As a case study, a classical resistance measurement with Wheatstone bridge was considered. Three scenarios were analysed: in-presence operation with manual control of instruments; in-presence operation with an automatic measuring station; and, finally, remote operation with an automatic measuring station. Results show that a common amount for every scenario spans from about 3000 kg to 18 000kg of equivalent carbon emission (CO2,eq) per year, wherein most of the variation derives from usage of air conditioning. Also, remote operation should be preferred to in-presence one (900kg to 1600kg of CO2,eq versus 1800kg to 4300kg of CO2,eq, with possible addition of 170kg to 310kg for the automatic measuring station).","PeriodicalId":261718,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 7th Forum on Research and Technologies for Society and Industry Innovation (RTSI)","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 7th Forum on Research and Technologies for Society and Industry Innovation (RTSI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RTSI55261.2022.9905201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sustainability is becoming one of the most important topics in almost all contexts. Because of climate change, it is imperative to be aware of the environmental impact of our actions, and so to re-evaluate the way processes are performed, including in the measurement domain. This paper discusses for the first time the environmental impact of a measurement. The analysis was carried on in the framework of recommendations by the International Telecommunication Union, which particularize ISO standards on life cycle assessment and carbon footprint to the Information and Communication Technology field. The carbon footprint was estimated for each element of a measurement by considering hardware, software, working environment, and operator-related footprint. Data were retrieved from previous literature or from public sustainability reports. As a case study, a classical resistance measurement with Wheatstone bridge was considered. Three scenarios were analysed: in-presence operation with manual control of instruments; in-presence operation with an automatic measuring station; and, finally, remote operation with an automatic measuring station. Results show that a common amount for every scenario spans from about 3000 kg to 18 000kg of equivalent carbon emission (CO2,eq) per year, wherein most of the variation derives from usage of air conditioning. Also, remote operation should be preferred to in-presence one (900kg to 1600kg of CO2,eq versus 1800kg to 4300kg of CO2,eq, with possible addition of 170kg to 310kg for the automatic measuring station).
测量的环境可持续性:惠斯通大桥的实际案例研究
可持续性正在成为几乎所有情况下最重要的话题之一。由于气候变化,必须意识到我们的行为对环境的影响,因此必须重新评估过程的执行方式,包括在测量领域。本文首次讨论了测量的环境影响。这项分析是在国际电信联盟的建议框架内进行的,这些建议将ISO关于生命周期评估和碳足迹的标准特别适用于信息和通信技术领域。碳足迹是通过考虑硬件、软件、工作环境和操作员相关的足迹来估计每个测量元素的碳足迹。数据从以前的文献或公共可持续发展报告中检索。以惠斯通电桥的经典电阻测量为例进行了研究。分析了三种情况:手动控制仪器的现场操作;具有自动测量站的现场操作;最后,通过自动测量站进行远程操作。结果表明,每种情景的共同数量从每年约3000公斤到18 000公斤当量碳排放(CO2,eq)不等,其中大部分变化来自空调的使用。此外,远程操作应优先于现场操作(900公斤至1600公斤二氧化碳当量,而不是1800公斤至4300kg二氧化碳当量,自动测量站可能增加170公斤至310公斤)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信