Assessing forest governance in Albania

Albora Kacani, Leonidha Peri
{"title":"Assessing forest governance in Albania","authors":"Albora Kacani, Leonidha Peri","doi":"10.31195/EJEJFS.473633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last 20 years, Albania has transferred the ownership and the responsibility of the management of 80% of forest area from central government to local government. The process was part of a wide decentralization reform aiming to tackle the challenges related to illegal logging activities, weak institutions, and capacities, unclear laws and regulations, frequent reforms in forest administration, high sector informality etc. Due to decentralization forest governance involve two levels of government and a range of stakeholders with different interests (local communities, forest owners, private sector, etc.). Although the reforms are under implementation, there is a lack of assessments, to analyze the governance challenges for the sector. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to provide an assessment of the status of forest governance in Albania, using a comprehensive analytical framework developed by FAO and PROFOR. The framework is based on three columns (i) policy, legal, institutional and regulatory frameworks, (ii) planning and decision-making processes and (iii) implementation enforcement and compliance. A set of 84 indicators, considered to be relevant for Albania, has been chosen out of 130 indicators proposed by PROFOR. The assessment is carried out through a survey, with a cross-section of 30 experts from various forest-related institutions (state and non-state). The results show that forest governance in Albania is far from good forest governance, despite some positive efforts. The reasons for this are no clear set of policy directions, conflicting or confusing laws, complex forest law and bylaws, no secure access to forest resources by local communities, low capacities of government (central and local) and non-government stakeholders, lack of transparency and accountability etc.","PeriodicalId":197799,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Forest Science","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Forest Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31195/EJEJFS.473633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the last 20 years, Albania has transferred the ownership and the responsibility of the management of 80% of forest area from central government to local government. The process was part of a wide decentralization reform aiming to tackle the challenges related to illegal logging activities, weak institutions, and capacities, unclear laws and regulations, frequent reforms in forest administration, high sector informality etc. Due to decentralization forest governance involve two levels of government and a range of stakeholders with different interests (local communities, forest owners, private sector, etc.). Although the reforms are under implementation, there is a lack of assessments, to analyze the governance challenges for the sector. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to provide an assessment of the status of forest governance in Albania, using a comprehensive analytical framework developed by FAO and PROFOR. The framework is based on three columns (i) policy, legal, institutional and regulatory frameworks, (ii) planning and decision-making processes and (iii) implementation enforcement and compliance. A set of 84 indicators, considered to be relevant for Albania, has been chosen out of 130 indicators proposed by PROFOR. The assessment is carried out through a survey, with a cross-section of 30 experts from various forest-related institutions (state and non-state). The results show that forest governance in Albania is far from good forest governance, despite some positive efforts. The reasons for this are no clear set of policy directions, conflicting or confusing laws, complex forest law and bylaws, no secure access to forest resources by local communities, low capacities of government (central and local) and non-government stakeholders, lack of transparency and accountability etc.
评估阿尔巴尼亚的森林管理
在过去的20年里,阿尔巴尼亚已经将80%森林面积的所有权和管理责任从中央政府转移到地方政府。这一进程是广泛的权力下放改革的一部分,旨在解决与非法采伐活动、体制和能力薄弱、法律法规不明确、森林管理改革频繁、部门非正式性高等有关的挑战。由于权力下放,森林治理涉及两级政府和一系列具有不同利益的利益相关者(当地社区、森林所有者、私营部门等)。尽管改革正在实施中,但缺乏评估来分析该部门面临的治理挑战。因此,本文的目的是利用粮农组织和联保部队制定的综合分析框架,对阿尔巴尼亚的森林管理状况进行评估。该框架基于三栏(i)政策、法律、体制和监管框架,(ii)规划和决策过程,(iii)实施、执行和遵守。从联保部队提出的130个指标中选择了一套84个被认为与阿尔巴尼亚有关的指标。评估是通过一项调查进行的,调查对象是来自各种与森林有关的机构(国家和非国家)的30名专家。结果表明,尽管做出了一些积极的努力,但阿尔巴尼亚的森林治理远非良好的森林治理。造成这种情况的原因是没有明确的政策方向,法律相互冲突或混乱,森林法律和细则复杂,地方社区无法安全获取森林资源,政府(中央和地方)和非政府利益攸关方能力低下,缺乏透明度和问责制等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信