Effect of Think-Pair-Share Instructional Strategy on Students’ Achievement in Civic Education in Bayelsa, Nigeria

A. Yusuf, V. C. Owede, M. Bello
{"title":"Effect of Think-Pair-Share Instructional Strategy on Students’ Achievement in Civic Education in Bayelsa, Nigeria","authors":"A. Yusuf, V. C. Owede, M. Bello","doi":"10.29333/aje.2018.325a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The major purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of Think-Pair-Share instructional Strategy on secondary school students’ achievement in Civic Education in Bayelsa State, Nigeria. The study adopted a quasi-experimental 2x2x3 pre-test,-post-test factorial design. All the SSS II students in Bayelsa State constituted the target population. Intact classes of 61 and 46 students were purposively sampled for the experimental and control groups respectively. Three researcher-designed instruments which included two instructional packages and one Test were used to collect data for the study. Reliability index of the Civic Education Achievement Test was 0.83 obtained through a test re-test method after an interval of two weeks using Pearson’s Product Moment Correlation while Analysis of Co-variance (ANCOVA) statistic was used to test three research hypotheses at 0.05 level of significance. Findings from this study revealed among others that students taught Civic Education using Think-Pair-Share strategy outperformed those in the control group. There is no significant effect of treatments on secondary school students’ achievement in Civic Education based on gender. Based on the findings, the study recommended among others that teachers should engage all categories of students in active learning where students’ previous experiences are explored to recreate new knowledge. taught with traditional (lecture) method. This present finding also confirms the findings of Bataineh and Bamiro (2015) reported in their separate studies that undergraduate students who were examined in Educational Psychology in King Saud University, Arabia, after been taught with the use of Think-Pair-Share strategy were not only found to obtained higher post-test mean scores compared to those taught with traditional method; but senior secondary students within Abeokuta metropolis taught Chemistry with the use of Think-Pair-Share strategy were also found to record higher post-test scores compared to those taught with a traditional method.","PeriodicalId":314053,"journal":{"name":"Anatolian Journal of Education","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatolian Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2018.325a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The major purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of Think-Pair-Share instructional Strategy on secondary school students’ achievement in Civic Education in Bayelsa State, Nigeria. The study adopted a quasi-experimental 2x2x3 pre-test,-post-test factorial design. All the SSS II students in Bayelsa State constituted the target population. Intact classes of 61 and 46 students were purposively sampled for the experimental and control groups respectively. Three researcher-designed instruments which included two instructional packages and one Test were used to collect data for the study. Reliability index of the Civic Education Achievement Test was 0.83 obtained through a test re-test method after an interval of two weeks using Pearson’s Product Moment Correlation while Analysis of Co-variance (ANCOVA) statistic was used to test three research hypotheses at 0.05 level of significance. Findings from this study revealed among others that students taught Civic Education using Think-Pair-Share strategy outperformed those in the control group. There is no significant effect of treatments on secondary school students’ achievement in Civic Education based on gender. Based on the findings, the study recommended among others that teachers should engage all categories of students in active learning where students’ previous experiences are explored to recreate new knowledge. taught with traditional (lecture) method. This present finding also confirms the findings of Bataineh and Bamiro (2015) reported in their separate studies that undergraduate students who were examined in Educational Psychology in King Saud University, Arabia, after been taught with the use of Think-Pair-Share strategy were not only found to obtained higher post-test mean scores compared to those taught with traditional method; but senior secondary students within Abeokuta metropolis taught Chemistry with the use of Think-Pair-Share strategy were also found to record higher post-test scores compared to those taught with a traditional method.
思考-配对-分享教学策略对尼日利亚巴耶尔萨学生公民教育成绩的影响
本研究的主要目的是调查思考-配对-分享教学策略对尼日利亚巴耶尔萨州中学生公民教育成绩的影响。本研究采用准实验2x2x3前测、后测析因设计。巴耶尔萨州所有SSS II学生构成了目标人群。有目的地分别抽取61名和46名完整班级的学生作为实验组和对照组。三个研究者设计的工具,包括两个教学包和一个测试,用于收集研究数据。公民教育成就测试的信度指数为0.83,采用Pearson积差相关法,间隔两周后进行重测,三个研究假设的检验采用协方差分析(ANCOVA)统计量,显著性水平为0.05。这项研究的结果显示,使用思考-配对-分享策略进行公民教育的学生比对照组的学生表现得更好。不同性别的处理方式对中学生公民教育成绩无显著影响。基于这些发现,该研究建议教师应让所有类别的学生参与主动学习,探索学生以前的经验,以重新创造新知识。用传统的(讲座)方法授课。目前的这一发现也证实了Bataineh和Bamiro(2015)在他们的独立研究中报告的发现,即在阿拉伯沙特国王大学接受教育心理学考试的本科生,在使用思考-配对-分享策略进行教学后,不仅发现与使用传统方法教学的学生相比获得了更高的测试后平均分数;但是,与使用传统方法教学的学生相比,使用思考-配对-分享策略教授化学的高中生也被发现取得了更高的测试后分数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信