Perceptions and Experiences of Precarious Employment in Canadian Libraries: An Exploratory Study

Ean Henninger, Adena Brons, Chloe Riley, Crystal Yin
{"title":"Perceptions and Experiences of Precarious Employment in Canadian Libraries: An Exploratory Study","authors":"Ean Henninger, Adena Brons, Chloe Riley, Crystal Yin","doi":"10.21083/partnership.v14i2.5169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Precarious employment is a labour practice characterized for employers by flexibility and economic efficiencies and for workers by vulnerability and uncertainty as to job duration, scheduling, and pay. It is increasingly common in Canada and can result in physical, mental, financial, and social strain for people who experience it. In libraries, it has the potential for negative effects on individual staff members, organizational health, and service quality. However, literature on precarious library work is scarce, and it is unclear how its effects on library staff compare to those described in the broader literature or how it affects the library field as a whole. \nThe purpose of this study was to gather information about library workers’ perceptions and experiences of precarious employment and to see how it played out in library contexts. Thirteen library workers both with and without experiences of precarious employment participated in qualitative, semi-structured interviews, which were synthesized into a narrative summarizing their thoughts and experiences. Results indicated that while there were some positive effects of precarious work, they mainly benefited library organizations from scheduling and financial standpoints, while negative outcomes were more numerous, more salient, and affected individuals as well as organizations. Awareness of such perceptions and experiences may help to spark conversations and support for those experiencing negative effects from precarious work, and it can serve to reduce or eliminate factors leading to those effects. However, failure to address them may result in negative outcomes for library workers and organizations, such as stress, turnover, marginalization, burnout, leaving the field, reduced service quality, and more. Accordingly, this paper provides some of the first qualitative information on precarious employment in libraries and may be used to support broader discussions about the topic.","PeriodicalId":406213,"journal":{"name":"Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v14i2.5169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Precarious employment is a labour practice characterized for employers by flexibility and economic efficiencies and for workers by vulnerability and uncertainty as to job duration, scheduling, and pay. It is increasingly common in Canada and can result in physical, mental, financial, and social strain for people who experience it. In libraries, it has the potential for negative effects on individual staff members, organizational health, and service quality. However, literature on precarious library work is scarce, and it is unclear how its effects on library staff compare to those described in the broader literature or how it affects the library field as a whole. The purpose of this study was to gather information about library workers’ perceptions and experiences of precarious employment and to see how it played out in library contexts. Thirteen library workers both with and without experiences of precarious employment participated in qualitative, semi-structured interviews, which were synthesized into a narrative summarizing their thoughts and experiences. Results indicated that while there were some positive effects of precarious work, they mainly benefited library organizations from scheduling and financial standpoints, while negative outcomes were more numerous, more salient, and affected individuals as well as organizations. Awareness of such perceptions and experiences may help to spark conversations and support for those experiencing negative effects from precarious work, and it can serve to reduce or eliminate factors leading to those effects. However, failure to address them may result in negative outcomes for library workers and organizations, such as stress, turnover, marginalization, burnout, leaving the field, reduced service quality, and more. Accordingly, this paper provides some of the first qualitative information on precarious employment in libraries and may be used to support broader discussions about the topic.
加拿大图书馆不稳定就业的认知与经验:探索性研究
不稳定就业是一种劳动实践,对雇主来说,其特点是灵活性和经济效率,而对工人来说,其特点是在工作时间、调度和工资方面的脆弱性和不确定性。它在加拿大越来越普遍,会给经历过它的人带来身体、精神、经济和社会压力。在图书馆中,它对个别工作人员、组织健康和服务质量有潜在的负面影响。然而,关于图书馆不稳定工作的文献很少,与更广泛的文献中描述的相比,它对图书馆工作人员的影响如何,或者它对整个图书馆领域的影响如何,都不清楚。本研究的目的是收集有关图书馆工作人员对不稳定就业的看法和经历的信息,并了解它在图书馆环境中如何发挥作用。13名有或没有不稳定工作经历的图书馆工作人员参加了定性的半结构化访谈,这些访谈被综合成一篇叙述,总结了他们的想法和经历。结果表明,不稳定工作虽然有一定的积极影响,但主要从时间安排和财务角度对图书馆组织有利,而负面影响则更多,更突出,并且对个人和组织都有影响。意识到这些观念和经历可能有助于激发对话和支持那些经历不稳定工作负面影响的人,它可以减少或消除导致这些影响的因素。然而,未能解决这些问题可能会给图书馆工作人员和组织带来负面后果,如压力、离职、边缘化、倦怠、离开这个领域、服务质量下降等等。因此,本文提供了一些关于图书馆不稳定就业的初步定性信息,并可用于支持有关该主题的更广泛讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信