Modeling the Reciprocal and Longitudinal Effect of Return on Sales and R&D Intensity During Economic Cycles

A. Nair, L. A. Jones‐Farmer, P. Swamidass
{"title":"Modeling the Reciprocal and Longitudinal Effect of Return on Sales and R&D Intensity During Economic Cycles","authors":"A. Nair, L. A. Jones‐Farmer, P. Swamidass","doi":"10.1504/IJTM.2010.029408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given that both the U.S. and EU have lost some of their edge in manufacturing to emerging Asian countries, the profitability and competitiveness of U.S. and EU firms depend more and more on innovation-based businesses. For example, while the steel industry lost 300,000 jobs in the USA between 1980 and 2000, four companies Microsoft, Oracle, Cisco and Dell, who did not have a single employee in 1980, had 200,000 highly paid employees by 2005. The switch to innovation-based businesses has been going on for nearly thirty years in the USA. In these companies, the role of RD this is the focus of this study both across all industries, as well as between selected industries with diverse RD the effect is not consistent across the two cycles studied. This exploratory study's findings lead us to conclude that RD the same is true for public policy addressing company/industry needs during economic cycles - fit the policy to each cycle. We consider this to be an exploratory study that opens a new avenue for more deeper investigation into the known relationship between profitability and R&D spending during the ups and downs of economic cycles at the level of the economy, selected industries, and individual corporations (for responding with appropriate corporate strategy during economic swings).","PeriodicalId":412022,"journal":{"name":"POL: Manufacturing Industry (Topic)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POL: Manufacturing Industry (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2010.029408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Given that both the U.S. and EU have lost some of their edge in manufacturing to emerging Asian countries, the profitability and competitiveness of U.S. and EU firms depend more and more on innovation-based businesses. For example, while the steel industry lost 300,000 jobs in the USA between 1980 and 2000, four companies Microsoft, Oracle, Cisco and Dell, who did not have a single employee in 1980, had 200,000 highly paid employees by 2005. The switch to innovation-based businesses has been going on for nearly thirty years in the USA. In these companies, the role of RD this is the focus of this study both across all industries, as well as between selected industries with diverse RD the effect is not consistent across the two cycles studied. This exploratory study's findings lead us to conclude that RD the same is true for public policy addressing company/industry needs during economic cycles - fit the policy to each cycle. We consider this to be an exploratory study that opens a new avenue for more deeper investigation into the known relationship between profitability and R&D spending during the ups and downs of economic cycles at the level of the economy, selected industries, and individual corporations (for responding with appropriate corporate strategy during economic swings).
经济周期中收益对销售和研发强度的纵向互惠效应建模
鉴于美国和欧盟在制造业方面的一些优势已经输给了新兴的亚洲国家,美国和欧盟公司的盈利能力和竞争力越来越依赖于以创新为基础的业务。例如,虽然钢铁业在1980年至2000年间在美国失去了30万个工作岗位,但微软、甲骨文、思科和戴尔四家公司在1980年没有一个员工,到2005年有20万名高薪员工。在美国,向以创新为基础的企业的转变已经持续了近30年。在这些公司中,研发的作用——这是本研究的重点,无论是在所有行业中,还是在具有不同研发的选定行业中——在两个研究周期中,效果并不一致。这项探索性研究的发现使我们得出结论,在经济周期中,解决公司/行业需求的公共政策也是如此——使政策适应每个周期。我们认为这是一项探索性研究,为更深入地研究经济周期起伏期间盈利能力和研发支出之间的已知关系开辟了新的途径,在经济波动期间,选择行业和个别公司(以适当的公司战略应对)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信